why so low?
was it the critics?
did the audience hate it more than other bad films(that have done better)?
a curious case.
...has Johns opened his page back up for commenting?
I want to ask him about kyle rayner
Here's my take.
They screwed up the marketing.
1.The first image they released of Reynolds in the CGI suit was not well received by the fanboys. Instead of sticking to their guns, they immediately changed the way the suit looks. That was a red flag for me. It meant they did not have much confidence in their product.
2. The first trailer sucked. It was underwhelming to say the least. Sure, they released a much improved second trailer but the damage was already done.
3. The director telling news media that he will not be involved in a sequel, weeks before the movie is even released! Yes, I know he does not do sequels, but to the average movie fan, it seems as if he is trying to distance himself from the film.
4. Rotten Tomatoes.
I have to admit, I
always check with Rottentomatoes.com before purchasing my movie tickets. Every time I have decided to go against their reviews and see a movie anyway, I get burned and the movie sucks!
So I've learned to use Rottentomatoes.com to help me from throwing my money away on bad movies.
Yes, I thought Transformers 2 was total garbage.
Is this the end of GL in movies?
I don't think so. I think in five or so years, they'll resurrect GL, perhaps in the Justice League flick, but I'm sure they won't use Ryan Reynolds.
I have not seen GL yet. The bad reviews at RT made me pause. (And the person who keeps on texting me that GL was a great movie, is the same dude who thought Transformers 2 was "awesome.")
I may go see it tomorrow. I don't know. We'll see.