It's a pretty standard thing in movies, something happens to someone that should kill them, but through sheer will they manage to do the impossible. That's what I saw in SR. Absorbing the suns rays helped, too.
It's a pretty standard thing in movies, something happens to someone that should kill them, but through sheer will they manage to do the impossible. That's what I saw in SR. Absorbing the suns rays helped, too.
No doubt about it, a hero overcoming their weaknesses by sheer will and determination has been around since Greek amphitheater's. Herculean Effort. I just thought that throwing NK laced with Kryptonite was enough, I didn't think their needed to be an exclamation point.
unless....they're saving that piece of Kryptonite for later......it's Kryptonite.......with presumably Superman's blood / DNA on it.............bizarro maybe??


well said, afan. For me, SR's Superman lacked the moral compass that defines the character for me.
and remember........Jason has already killed a guy. yah, he was defending his mom.....and it was probably not intentional......but they didn't have to actually make him kill the guy....knocked out and incapicitated, maybe......but not actually kill.....
like father like son.....i guess.....
Another of SR's faults that the third act magnifies is the total lack of the film to give "the people" any identity in the film. Aside from the main characters(and even that sparingly) did Superman ever once address an individual.
Donner's Superman was chock full of little vignettes between Superman and the general public. The girl with her cat, the crooks on the boat, the cat burgalur, the arresting officer, the priceless tho wordless interraction with Air Force One's pilot, the list goes on and on, and yet I am stumped to recall any such interractions in SR. Making the general population in the film totally faceless and iconsequential. Just mindless cattle moving to and fro.
Now back to the magnification of this in Act 3. Where was a national response to NK. Surely the emergence of a continent of the eastern seaboard should raise an eyebrow someplace, but then within the framework of SR, the abscence of any real people(aside from the main characters)reacting as real people do, should come I guess as no surprise.
Another of SR's faults that the third act magnifies is the total lack of the film to give "the people" any identity in the film. Aside from the main characters(and even that sparingly) did Superman ever once address an individual.
Donner's Superman was chock full of little vignettes between Superman and the general public. The girl with her cat, the crooks on the boat, the cat burgalur, the arresting officer, the priceless tho wordless interraction with Air Force One's pilot, the list goes on and on, and yet I am stumped to recall any such interractions in SR. Making the general population in the film totally faceless and iconsequential. Just mindless cattle moving to and fro.
Now back to the magnification of this in Act 3. Where was a national response to NK. Surely the emergence of a continent of the eastern seaboard should raise an eyebrow someplace, but then within the framework of SR, the abscence of any real people(aside from the main characters)reacting as real people do, should come I guess as no surprise.
I mentioned the main characters, of which Kitty was one. In the plane he was speechifying to a large group.
I was pointing out the lack of any interraction with individuals in the entirety of the film and how that may explain the lack of any thought by the writers to including a response to NK by the people.
I would of liked to know what happend to the guy with the big gun. It cuts when supes get shot in the eye. You think supes blew him off the building ha ha