Superman Returns Have your thoughts about the suit changed?

[Showtime]

No but they are based on them, you have to respect where they came from, and that suit does look gay. It sucks. Superman hasn't had one good movie. Good actors but no good movies.

You find no value in any of the Superman movies?

 

[Scooter]

You find no value in any of the Superman movies?

He said they've had good actors. I believe that would be the "value".

 

[StarvingArtist]

No but they are based on them, you have to respect where they came from, and that suit does look gay. It sucks. Superman hasn't had one good movie. Good actors but no good movies.

If that's what you really think, then you're in the minority. (About the movies, not Routh's costume)

 

[Showtime]

He said they've had good actors. I believe that would be the "value".

He values the actors, not the movie himself. You could really apply that either way.

 

[SolidSnakeMGS]

No but they are based on them, you have to respect where they came from, and that suit does look gay. It sucks. Superman hasn't had one good movie. Good actors but no good movies.

That's definitely an opinion that's in the minority. Not that that makes you wrong...

Do you like any kind of comic book movies? Hopefully your answer can shed some light on your preference.

 

[Scooter]

He values the actors, not the movie himself. You could really apply that either way.

You, more or less, asked him/her if s/he found any value in the movies. The actors - which s/he obviously values - were in the movies.

 

[Showtime]

You, more or less, asked him/her if s/he found any value in the movies. The actors - which s/he obviously values - were in the movies.

His quote cancels that theory, "Good actors, no good movies." He is seperating them, not me.

 

[Venom71]

No but they are based on them, you have to respect where they came from, and that suit does look gay. It sucks. Superman hasn't had one good movie. Good actors but no good movies.

Was it really necessary to use that term?

 

[StarvingArtist]

Hmm looks like the Superman Suit to me..guess that means they all look that way to you then huh?

Dude, why do you have to criticize his opinion? Not everyone sees things the same way you do.

 

[Venom71]

Dude, why do you have to criticize his opinion? Not everyone sees things the same way you do.

I woudn't have but I see it unecessary to use that term he used to describe it.

 

[StarvingArtist]

I woudn't have but I see it unecessary to use that term he used to describe it.

Well that's different.

 

[skruloos]

No but they are based on them, you have to respect where they came from, and that suit does look gay. It sucks. Superman hasn't had one good movie. Good actors but no good movies.

That's strange considering that StM is probably one of the movies that respected the comics the most.

 

[Mr. Thing]

That's strange considering that StM is probably one of the movies that respected the comics the most.

Well, that's debatable.

 

[afan]

Well, that's debatable.

That, my friend, would be a very tough debate.

 

[StarvingArtist]

Well, that's debatable.

Anything is debatable

 

[StarvingArtist]

That, my friend, would be a very tough debate.

Not necessarily.

 

[Mr. Thing]

That, my friend, would be a very tough debate.

Depends. Visually it was extremely faithfull. But in other areas it was a bit different.

 

[SolidSnakeMGS]

Sure, it would be a pretty tough debate. The movie was important as well as comics were something that were never turned into serious movies. It set the bar nicely.

 

[Oldguy]

The problem is what version of the character the film is adapting. An adaption of say, Fliescher's Superman or perhaps even Swan's would be considerably more conducive for film as opposed to a rendition featuring Bogdanov's crazy muscle supes. But then you begin to get into people's personal preferences in versions of the character. A film that sticks close to the source material of one version cannot be held accountable for the harsh reactions and claims of source material violation from people who prefer a different version of the character.

Here's the one of the most perfected human physiques, in his prime in street clothes. Doesn't look out of place at all.

Bodybuilder doesn't always mean juice monkey, surprises me that a professional artist like JamalYIngle can't tell the difference.

As far as all incarnations being fair game tho, how would you feel if a movie was made with Shuster and Siegel's original depiction of Superman where he's abusing women and amusing himself with one liners while using lethal force? It wouldn't bother me, but I imagine a lot of others would be.

I think th esource material that should be used should be the most contemporary. Look how well Schumachers' Ode to West fared against Nolan's Miller inspired movie.

 

[Showtime]

Here's the one of the most perfected human physiques, in his prime in street clothes. Doesn't look out of place at all.

Bodybuilder doesn't always mean juice monkey, surprises me that a professional artist like JamalYIngle can't tell the difference.

As far as all incarnations being fair game tho, how would you feel if a movie was made with Shuster and Siegel's original depiction of Superman where he's abusing women and amusing himself with one liners while using lethal force? It wouldn't bother me, but I imagine a lot of others would be.

I think th esource material that should be used should be the most contemporary. Look how well Schumachers' Ode to West fared against Nolan's Miller inspired movie.

Who is the photo of?

 

[StarvingArtist]

Here's the one of the most perfected human physiques, in his prime in street clothes. Doesn't look out of place at all.

Bodybuilder doesn't always mean juice monkey, surprises me that a professional artist like JamalYIngle can't tell the difference.

As far as all incarnations being fair game tho, how would you feel if a movie was made with Shuster and Siegel's original depiction of Superman where he's abusing women and amusing himself with one liners while using lethal force? It wouldn't bother me, but I imagine a lot of others would be.

I think th esource material that should be used should be the most contemporary. Look how well Schumachers' Ode to West fared against Nolan's Miller inspired movie.

An adaption of S & S version would ****ing ROCK. However, I kind of agree that the source material should be contemporary. It's what the general public is most familar with and the reason why the hero is popular nowadays.

 

[Mr. Thing]

Who is the photo of?

Steve Reeves if I'm not mistaken.

 

[Showtime]

Steve Reeves if I'm not mistaken.

Thanks. Another Reeves.

 

[skruloos]

Look how well Schumachers' Ode to West fared against Nolan's Miller inspired movie.

Neither of which did as good as Burton's ode to Kane.

 

[Showtime]

Or Burton's ode to Prince.