dark_b
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
- Messages
- 47,231
- Reaction score
- 504
- Points
- 73
is this a bad thing?Or you could not be a pirate and see it in theaters.
is this a bad thing?Or you could not be a pirate and see it in theaters.
Or you could not be a pirate and see it in theaters.
A. The only pirate is the one who put it online. The ones who watch it are innocent because:
B. This is a movie nobody should be forced to pay $10 for. It sucked.
i havent seen this yet and honestly by what ive seen on tv Im not to excited but just knowing that Heather Matarazzo gets naked is worth giving it a try cuz she is HOOOTT
wow....just wow. i think she's gross. i couldn't possibly see why anyone would find her attractive.
i saw the movie and it was really stupid. not that the 1st one was good, but the sequel was just so boring and pointless. and the "twist" at the end..if you can call it that...is equally stupid.
i liked it...though it was just a tad bit short. The lead girl at the end rocked hard..teeheee shes a bad azz now
Was that the art teacher bathing in blood?
I find Heather Matarazzo to be cute as hell
yeah i think it was the art teacher.
Hmm, it was a surprise but I wouldn't say "most shocking in horror film history".I'm curious as to what this "most shocking ending in horror film history" is.
I find her pretty ugly myself....
...and yes, this is the best pic i could find of her. Unless she has a godly body, i don't see what all the fuss is about.
The gore, violence and sex has been toned down dramatically since the first one.
I agree with most of your statement. Although I didn't think it sucked, it's still not something I would have paid 10 buckaroos to see.
So it becomes a case of "see it for free" vs. "not see it at all". Not to mention, I can pause it when I wish, fix something to eat, resume, and go to bed immediately after. Common sense says...