Whiskey Tango
Avenger
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2007
- Messages
- 25,209
- Reaction score
- 3
- Points
- 31
Other transforming mutants?
I think it's just easier and makes more sense to assume that all the events of the first trilogy + the two Wolverine movies never happened in the newly formed timeline.
Does Wolvie even have adamantium claws? At the end, that was Mystique acquiring Wolvie's body, not Stryker, which means he would not experiment on him directly afterwards. Is this correct?
It's possible, I suppose. But does that mean that his memory remains intact?
Mystique in the OT doesn't make sense if she was supposedly captured after killing Trask in the 70s and experimented on since for Sentinel research.
The mutant phenomenon being a fairly recent thing in the OT doesn't jive with the very public and televised shenanigans that occurred in the 70s.
How does it not make sense? It's not like she was killed.
It definitely was not a recent phenomenon in the OT.
Where are all those people from a year ago who were swearing up and down there wouldn't be any retcons, no alternate timelines, if you think they'd invalidate the movies like that you're stupid, etc? Funny! Maybe I'll look some of those posts up later.
Hmm I do wonder if The Wolverine still happened now? Even though it was a stand alone, a good deal of it was Wolverine dealing with the fallout over the death of Jean.
That kinda sucks because I really liked the Wolverine.
Yup, some things still have happen, like Rogue's white streak.
Maybe I misunderstood that part, but what I got from the movie was that she was dead in the timeline of the bad future. It doesn't make sense she could have survived the experimentation given the fate of their other subjects, and Trask made it clear that they planned to harvest every bit of Mystique they could to effectively research her ability for the Sentinels' adaptive abilities.
It was certainly treated as being a recent phenomenon in X-Men. Senate hearings on the subject appeared to be fairly new, and it was even considered to be just a potential add on to the Ellis Island summit rather than a formal part of the proceedings.
Hmm, yes, you are correct: You completely misunderstood that part.
It certainly was. To further add to the Senate hearings bit, Senator Kelly's testimony seems to imply that the mutant phenomenon is fairly recent, not something that should've been known for decades.No it wasn't, not even remotely.
It certainly was. To further add to the Senate hearings bit, Senator Kelly's testimony seems to imply that the mutant phenomenon is fairly recent, not something that should've been known for decades.
She wasn't dead when Trask captured her in the old timeline. The film never said that. Just said she was captured and experimented on.
What we can infer from this new info to line up with the way things were is that somehow she escaped and because of what happened to her, that is the reason she was the cold blooded assassin in the original trilogy.
Makes complete sense.
A rewatch should confirm it. It doesn't make sense that Mystique could've survived the experiments when every subject thus far had died from them, and it's especially damning in her case since there is a mandate to harvest every bit of her for their Sentinel research.
It certainly was. To further add to the Senate hearings bit, Senator Kelly's testimony seems to imply that the mutant phenomenon is fairly recent, not something that should've been known for decades.