DaRkVeNgeanCe
An Epic Film Guy
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2004
- Messages
- 13,809
- Reaction score
- 97
- Points
- 33
LOL the troll posts too much nonsense!
I couldn't agree more.LOL the troll posts too much nonsense!
Huh? A troll because he is multi-quote replying to someone who is doing exactly the same thing??
In regards to Catwoman, this whole "open to interpretation" argument is weak. The fact is, she was revived by cats and spends the rest of the film acting like a cat right down to being able to survive being killed (9 lives!) and become agile enough to jump, climb and cartwheel around.
It is plainly obvious that Burton was taking a supernatural approach to Catwoman, having her revived by cats and inheriting their characteristics. The alternative explanation:
Selina was a supreme gymnastics expert and advanced in martial arts who just happens to spend her days as a humble secretary. When she miraculously survives a fall, cats surround her for no other reason than to wake her up from unconsciousness (cats do this). She then finally decides to put her gymnastics and martial arts training to good use (not to mention her great skill with a whip!) to get back at the man who almost killed her. And of course ignore it when he literally tells Shreck how many times she has been "killed".
Alternatively, you can interpret it the only way it was presented. That is, a humble secretary is reborn as a half woman-half cat in some kind of supernatural event that is never explained.
Sorry but the idea that Burton left her situation up for interpretation gives the film far too much credit. As it is, it works in Burton's film which is really a twisted fairytale with a Batman story integrated throughout.
Also, we don't get mad at you because you're critizing a Batman movie. We just think that your reasons of hating Batman Returns are lame.
Old Batman documentary about Bill Dee Williams as Harvey Dent.
What a troll. You're not suppose to take everything in Batman Returns literally because Tim Burton is a weirdo and he wants his movies to be vague and artistic, that's why there's so many WTF moments. I knew this when I was 7 years old.
panda_eater said:What a troll. You're not suppose to take everything in Batman Returns literally because Tim Burton is a weirdo and he wants his movies to be vague and artistic, that's why there's so many WTF moments. I knew this when I was 7 years old.
I watched this film again recently and I didn't hate it as much as I previousy did.
But it got me thinking, is The Penguin supposed to represent some kind of Antichrist figure? I've heard the comparison made before.
Did Burton use the Biblical figure as inspiration for Oswalds rise and fall?
I watched this film again recently and I didn't hate it as much as I previousy did.
But it got me thinking, is The Penguin supposed to represent some kind of Antichrist figure? I've heard the comparison made before.
Did Burton use the Biblical figure as inspiration for Oswalds rise and fall?
There have been parallels to Moses and Jesus.
While I like Batman Returns, I do find it slightly overrated.
One thing I did notice when I re-watched all the old films, though, was this:
Everyone says The Riddler and Two-Face in Batman Forever were Joker rip-offs, but did anyone else see Poison Ivy in Batman & Robin almost being an EXACT duplicate of Catwoman from Batman Returns?
That said, it was done well by Michelle, not by Uma.
^ Well, it's simple, look at your posts.
Anyways, I think BR is very misunderstood and very underrated.