I Am Doom....discuss me [merged-2]

wetgorilla said:
This review NEEDS to be returned to the top of this thread. The character of Doom has been tipped over a sa****se and raped by this production team!

I was reading a magazine today with a small interview with Julian McMahon and Julian stated he 'studied' to play Doom by spending weeks watching horror films! How pathetic and ignorant his approach to this character was. This is just a small reflection of how the entire production approached this project. If anyone here believes Story or the rest of the crew paid much attention to the source material while deciding upon a direction for this project, you'd be giving them too much credit.

Once again, this review NEEDS to be returned to the top of this thread. Happy reading! :cool:

Wetgorilla
:wolverine

Sometimes when I read your posts Wet they remind me so much of Harry Knowles on AICN that I'd swear you two were the same person. :rolleyes:

Hmmm.

:cool:
 
Lightning Strikez! said:
Sometimes when I read your posts Wet they remind me so much of Harry Knowles on AICN that I'd swear you two were the same person. :rolleyes:

Hmmm.

:cool:

Not the same but close "friends". Pictured below Harry (in bald cap) and WG are spreading mad negativity . . .


no animals were hurt in this photo
 



You people are hell bent on quoting aren't ya....its a conspiracy against me having a pleasant time on this forum....



a conspiracy......a conspiracy i tell ya........



*goes to search for mel gibson*
 
RedIsNotBlue said:
Nope. I preferred his because he seemed to actually give an open minded opinion.
What's your definition of 'open minded opinion'. Let me guess....an opinion that isn't an opinion at all? Maybe one that is devoid of any mental posture? Hell, Saint stated his position, gave reasons for such a position, and also provided examples from which he based his conclusions. So, where are you coming from with this statement?

RedIsNotBlue said:
While you seem to have had a vendetta long before you even read the novel. I have seen your posts from a long while back bashing Doom and even Julian McMahon. And I don't care if you hate the movie Doom but I just sense a hatred for him no matter what so that is why I find your review less noteworthy.
Sounds logical - Toss out any regard for facts and adopt an axiom of reason based on feelings and disregard! Good job, Bingo!

RedIsNotBlue said:
Also Lightning read the script and I don't know if you have but that to me is enough reason alone to prefer his.
What? Did you stand behind Lightning while he thumbed through each page?? It appears you base your doubts not on a lack of evidence - but rather the southwinds of your feelings! Good luck with that approach to issues. :p

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
 
lockjaw said:
Not the same but close "friends". Pictured below Harry (in bald cap) and WG are spreading mad negativity . . .



no animals were hurt in this photo
Hey, I like that picture! LOL. But, tell the truth, Lockjaw.....that was you I was hugging onto during the bike-rally! :p

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
Oh, I forgot! That was our little secret. Ooopps. ;)
 
wetgorilla said:
This review NEEDS to be returned to the top of this thread. The character of Doom has been tipped over a sa****se and raped by this production team!

I was reading a magazine today with a small interview with Julian McMahon and Julian stated he 'studied' to play Doom by spending weeks watching horror films! How pathetic and ignorant his approach to this character was. This is just a small reflection of how the entire production approached this project. If anyone here believes Story or the rest of the crew paid much attention to the source material while deciding upon a direction for this project, you'd be giving them too much credit.

Once again, this review NEEDS to be returned to the top of this thread. Happy reading! :cool:

Wetgorilla
:wolverine

What's bothering me, at least, part of it, is how often Julian and co. (including Tim Story) tells in interviews how "true" to the character this adaption of Doom "truly" is, when, really, if you know your stuff, you sure as **** know you couldn't be that much farther away from the source material then they are getting.

At least if they could admit they made countless changes, and that they AT LEAST tried to defend their all new villain, instead of throwing at us again how "faithful" he is, it would be a tad least frustrating. Why not DEFEND their character, admitting they made changes ? Why lie, when it's clearly a lie ?

"God bless the edit button!"
 
Omg....rape...you are comparing it to rape????? you are.....thes....i'm sorry...but thats just gross....
 
JMAfan said:
Omg....rape...you are comparing it to rape????? you are.....thes....i'm sorry...but thats just gross....

Of course I am, i've always been a disturbed freak. A proud one, though.

Heck, here's a movie I filmed not too long ago.

http://g1mike.sidpowered.com/index2.html

It's on my friend's website, on the main page. (in the news' section). It's more of a practiced of the kind of images I can filmed right now, actually.

Oh, and that's me in the clown's outift. ;)

(the resolution's pretty bad, but I had to throw away something to put it on the internet, oh well)

Enjoy. :p
 
TheSaintofKillers said:
Of course I am, i've always been a disturbed freak. A proud one, though.

Heck, here's a movie I filmed not too long ago.

http://g1mike.sidpowered.com/index2.html

It's on my friend's website, on the main page. in the news' section). It's more of a practiced of the kind of images I can filmed right now, actually.

Oh, and that's me in the clown's outift. ;)

Enjoy. :p


i think i'll ummmmm pass......
 
Herr Logan said:
As much as I'm disgusted with what they've done with movie Doom (as well as the plebeians that continue to childishly defend that decision), very little in this world could be worse than what you just wrote about the bat. :(

:wolverine

Actually, I don't think it's any worse than what they are doing to Doom. All I did was change the name, and the location for it to apply to the bat. But, really, it's pretty much the same.
 
TheSaintofKillers said:
Well, you could have seen the raping "theme" i'm using, heh.

ok...
 
JMAfan said:

Hey, i'm not evil. I just like to make evil things.

And yes, you can quote me on that someday. ;)

(oh, and it's not everyday you put a video of yourself on the internet, and, while there's some raping going on in there, no real porn is involved. At least, give me credit on that. :joker: )
 
TheSaintofKillers said:
Of course I am, i've always been a disturbed freak. A proud one, though.

Heck, here's a movie I filmed not too long ago.

http://g1mike.sidpowered.com/index2.html

It's on my friend's website, on the main page. (in the news' section). It's more of a practiced of the kind of images I can filmed right now, actually.

Oh, and that's me in the clown's outift. ;)

(the resolution's pretty bad, but I had to throw away something to put it on the internet, oh well)

Enjoy. :p
That was extremely disturbing:o
 
Kmack said:
That was extremely disturbing:o

You wouldn't believe how many "You, mister, are ****ed top" replied I got from viewers when I screened that in front of 200 people, with children and old people.

Best 4 minutes of my life, of course. :)
 
TheSaintofKillers said:
What's bothering me, at least, part of it, is how often Julian and co. (including Tim Story) tells in interviews how "true" to the character this adaption of Doom "truly" is, when, really, if you know your stuff, you sure as **** know you couldn't be that much farther away from the source material then they are getting.:o

The reason for that strange phenomenon, is simple - None of them have really read the FF or at the very least spent any nominal time researching the 300+ issue run.

Can anyone see Julian M. spending the weekend reading issue 1-50 (not too small of a task to ask if you're being paid over a million bucks for a few months of work)? Instead he spends a week popping in a few 'horror' movies. Ugghh!

How about Jessica Alba? Does anyone here feel Jessica is the type to spend a few hours reading the entire John Byrne run of the eighties?? Or maybe she might have been too busy filming Sin City and the rest of her cinematic appearances? hmmmmmm.

Tim Story - Nah. The developed script and his final product will speak for itself.

Oh, well. It is what It is. :down

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
I thought I was going to be able to stay off this forum until after screening it - but y'all dragged me back in with your condemnation of objectivity. So balance needs to be reinstated!
 
wetgorilla said:
The reason for that strange phenomenon, is simple - None of them have really read the FF or at the very least spent any nominal time researching the 300+ issue run.

Can anyone see Julian M. spending the weekend reading issue 1-50 (not too small of a task to ask if you're being paid over a million bucks for a few months of work)? Instead he spends a week popping in a few 'horror' movies. Ugghh!

How about Jessica Alba? Does anyone here feel Jessica is the type to spend a few hours reading the entire John Byrne run of the eighties?? Or maybe she might have been too busy filming Sin City and the rest of her cinematic appearances? hmmmmmm.

Tim Story - Nah. The developed script and his final product will speak for itself.

Oh, well. It is what It is. :down

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
I thought I was going to be able to stay off this forum until after screening it - but y'all dragged me back in with your condemnation of objectivity. So balance needs to be reinstated!

What's funny, is that most of them "read comic books when they were young", and remember how cool they though they were. Yet, they never went back, not even for the movie.

Julian speaks of Doom, saying how he was his coolest villain ever, but i've got a feeling that if he had had the role for bulleye, he'd be saying the very same thing, but with a certain targetman instead.
 
Kmack said:
That was extremely disturbing:o

extremely disturbing! I'm going to have to watch some HGTV to wash that out of my semian brain! LOL

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
 
JMAfan said:
Awwwww damn it Herr, just enjoy the damn clip....will ya????.....geeeeeezzz.....


why does everything have to be principal w/ you???......enjoy it damn it....:)

Don't you tell me how to enjoy movie clips of enormous primates, woman! :mad:

Yes'm. :o

:wolverine
 
Although, while I watched your movie....I had to admit to myself, your director created a very strong sense of suspense and cinematic tension by not revealing too much. I particularly liked how the girl and other characters were half-hidden in shadows most of the time. The short really had no direction and relied upon shock images a little too much. I do understand it was just a 4-minute reel and as much theatrics had to be squeezed in.

Your performance was .....uh....entertaining!

Wetgorilla
:wolverine
 
Dear Christ!

You guys rule. :up:

Just when I thought this thread couldn't get any better it does...

Here I am reading about the sabotaging of Doom and then it's about clown movies and rape and King Kong.

So totally ****ed up...

ROFLMAO
 
Lord, I'll be so glad when this movie gets here, if for anything to silence some of the misplaced b1tching around here.

1.) Tim Story did not write the script--he has no credit there. Now he IS responsible for adding many of the nuances we'll see i.e. The Yancey Street gang, H.E.R.B.I.E (if it makes the final cut), the Fantasticar, and many other items. And sorry, but unless he's crammed in all of that comic reading in the last few months, his claim to read/collected FF since he was age 11 comes through loud and clear in his interviews. He and his team also fought for a lot of the changes that we've seen since January.

2.) It was 20th Century Fox that called for the reorg on Doctor Doom--they wanted him updated for this origin film. Whether their approach works or not remains to be seen, but this is not the first time they've made an adjustment and it worked out even better on-screen.

Saint & Wet, I suggest you pick up the "Making Of The Movie" and read it. It will show you want Tim wanted and what the studio *permitted*. For example, if it weren't for Tim and his team, your Dr. Doom wouldn't have even been given a mask at all. The studio wanted face make-up only...so count your blessings.
 
JMAfan said:
OOOOOOhhhh well then "sheep" should have been part of that rant Herr......geeeez i'm totally disappointed in you......:p

I reckon I'm just getting weary of hearing the same ignorant nonsense repeated to me by people with precious little imagination and insight. It's like in my mind, I already called him a sheep, so I didn't feel the need to in real life. Weird.

:wolverine
 
TheSaintofKillers said:
Haven't read the whole thread, but, having read the novel, and being a big Doom fan, I can assure you they sure as **** didn't get it.

Doom is not Doom, and not just in name. In personality also. There is so little of Doom in there, it's depressing. I've discussed this so many times i've lost count. If people think he's faithful, then they don't know enough about him. Heck, if they think he's better, then they better go and read some of the great comics with Doom to see why their opinion might change pretty fast on the matter. Doom is not just a great villain, he's by and FAR the greatest villain.

Here's the old review I made about how Doom was portrayed in the book, since I have no envy to repeat myself, other than by quoting myself, of course:

Now, I had lost all hopes nearly a year ago. Having read the Frost script (which, btw, is nearly THE exact same as the newest movie, nearly nothing has changed), I was heavily disappointed by how Doom acted, his origin, and his powers. But, Lightning Strikez! gave me hopes. He's always been great doing so (and he should always continue to ) by providing us exemples as to why Doom from the movie wouldn't be THAT far away. Unfortunately, the exemples he gave were all that made Doom remotely close to his comic self.

Victor is madly in love with Sue, even if he often tries to deny it. Sure, when he goes ga-ga crazy, he begins to totally hate her, but that's something else (since he's crazy). The thing here, is that Victor, before his "accident" isn't Doom at all. Doom should always be Doom, even before his accident.

Here, he isn't. He's a ruthless businessman, who fought to be where he is, but that... isn't even CLOSE to Doom's dreams. He should see far much further than he does. When he goes crazy, he makes a reference to Leonard (his kind of secretary) about how he should think bigger. But, never (aside from here) does he ever even ATTEMP to show us (or try) to want something global, other than money and "more electricity".

Another thing. Since Doom was always Doom in the comics, he didn't think much bigger when he had his accident. He already wanted more. Here, we are led to believe that he was "human" before, but after his accident, someone acting like Doom can only be "crazy". That's what he is in the movie. A crazy metal dude. He's not a true "God among manking", he's a freak of nature that goes on a rampage, a lot like Electro himself often do. He's just NOT Doom. Thinking about it, his situation is simular to that of Norman Osborn in the first spiderman movie. Both got crazy after their accident, explaining why they were "eviiiIIiiil", which is lame, imo, since Doom was always much more than just evil. But here, that's all he is when he become "Doctor Doom"... (just the fact that he become Doctor Doom is horrible, since he should always have been himself).

And worse, much worse than all of that, he's not even HALF the scientific mind Richard his. What made Doom SUCH A GREAT villain (or heck, more than a villain) was his intellect. Here, sure, he's intelligent, manipulative, but so much less than Reed. Doom being anything less than Reed's equal (much less not even half his genius) is absolutely atrocious. Heck, Doom never does anything by himself. He always hired scientist and doctors to make his discoveries. There's even a scene (showed in the trailer), when he has to go to a doctor to know what is happening to him. MY GOD. We are talking about DOOM here. He would NEVER ask someone's else opinion, much less about his condition, when he himself could analyse it much better (alas, not here, though). For he is suppose to be DOOM. And DOOM is above all.

At the end, when he loses and become a living statue, the writers had the golden possibility to have Doom cry a last "RiiiIIIIIiiiichard". I mean, when I got there, I though it was the PERFECT PLACE. But no, instead he seems to cry a "noooooOOooooooooo" (and by all that is in the bottom of my holy rectum, I hope it's not as horrible as the one Vader cries at the end of ROTS).

I could have forgiven his relation to Sue, his mutant powers, but NOT what made him superior to all villains, his INTELLECT. That, imo, is a change I cannot forgive, which is stupid, and makes me cringe just thinking about it.

But that's not all. I won't go into his powers, and all, since we've all discussed that dozen of times here, but I want to address the Sue/Victor relationship.

It's a mess, imo. Lightning said that Doom never truly cared about Sue. Having read the book, i'd say he was wrong (sorry). Doom cared about Sue, a lot, even if he seems to want to not accept it. When she goes in Reed's arms, he is hurted a lot. But, all this really does is make Sue a bad character, imo. Really, she goes out two years with Victor. She probably fell "something" for him, for godsake. Two years. And yet, the instant Reed comes back, she runs in his arms. That, no problem here. She loved the dude even more than the old doctor. It's understandable. But, once Reed was back, she stopped caring about Victor. She didn't even noticed he existed anymore. I mean, when everything goes wrong for him, she doesn't even think about him. He could have died she wouldn't even have cared. That makes her something much closer to a bad girl (villain here) than a hero, imo. Victor goes crazy, and that's in part due to how she left him, and pull a finger on him, without no other reason than that she loved another man more. She completely left him, without even truly telling him how she truly felt about all of this. When he becomes a statue, at the very end, she's all too happy to be "discarded" of her ex-boyfriend, like some mean 16 years old adolescent on a rampage.

That's a pretty bad reason, imo. Exactly the kind of person I could never respect. That's the kind of character i'm going to root for in theatre ? Sure, i wanted the FF to win when I read the book, but not Sue. Victor could have fried her i'd have been relieved. Here's hoping Jessica Alba's so good she'll make me think otherwise.

So, Sue's a pretty messed up character here , and Doom's one of the worst adaptation possible of the greatest villain there is.

But, imo, movie Doom is still a great villain. He's easily, just after Magneto, the second best superhero movie villain. Easily. If he had been faithful, he would have took the first place without any difficulty, but oh well. A 10% faithful Doom is still better than most villains.

All in all, a month or two after writing that, when I rethink about it, I only have disgust about that awful adaptation. It's up there with CINO.

Bleh, I hate fox and marvel. Destroying the best villain there is.

If you people want to understand why Doom's such a great villain, unlike his movie counterpart, go read Secret war, or the Doom 2099 by Warren Ellis, or the three part storyarc by Chuck Dixon named "DOOM". I'd recommend those to the ones who don't know him much. Then, well, there is so much more. :doom:

Anyways...great job, Saint!

You have confirmed my worst fears...

I mean, how hard is it to make movie Doom at least as smart as Reed?

How can anyone actually defend such a basic change in Doom's character?

Even if I agreed (which I don't) that CEO Doom was necessary, that organic armor was necessary, that the love triangle was necessary...

...why is it also necessary to dumb the character down, intelligence-wise?

It just makes no sense to me.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"