I Am Doom....discuss me [merged-2]

[Saph]

Saph, I think there are a few very possible reasons why they may have put a cape on their little toy and here's a couple I can think of that might well be likely: 1) As I already suggested they may simply be using an old mold which I would imagine to be even cheaper for them (The toy manufacturers have already done this by recycling an old model of the fantasticar for the movie toys)

Yet its still easier to use a normal mold if what you are saying is the look the movie is using in the first place. And a car is a lot different from a little action figure.

and 2) Maybe they designed and modelled the figures before the movie designs were finalised - that would also explain why the head of their Thing resembles the comics look more than the movies look.
Should also note there is a 'Thing Car' thrown in with the toys (complete with a painted rock design) and the Thing in an astronaut suit too, but I dont expect that we are gonna see either of those actually in the film: They will always make toys from these movies that have little or nothing to do with what was really in them.

And maybe they didn't? The Thing Car and Thing astronaut suit are irrelevant, we're talking about THIS toy, depicting the FINAL SCENE, and these toys that show scenes have been proven as insights to what happens in the movie, this happened with SM2.

The Thing toy looks like the comic version because: There is no point to make a different strong man mold. And whether you can't see the painfully obvious brow that is on movie Things face is your problem, not the toys.

No, when all the more rendered & accurate action dolls all show no cape, all the pics we have seen of JM in the suit show no cape, and we have an inside source that seems to be credible also state there is none, I do think it's safe to assume there simply is not one.

The same action dolls that show Doom with skin still on his hands? This shows these action dolls aren't Doom at the end of his transformation. And i hear they're keeping the cape thing secret.. why put it on a lego toy then? Because no one will take a lego toy seriously.. proof of this? Your reaction.

Seriously, I would love to be wrong about that, as that may harbour some hope we might see a more traditional looking Thing crop up too in that finale, but I do think the evidence against that is a good deal stronger than the evidence for it, which all in all amounts to no more than a picture of a lego toy atm.

Your first wish has came true, because the Thing looks classic all the way throughout this movie. Isn't that brow huge? Oh wait, you can't see it for some reason. Oh well.

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

But you're all caught up, now, so it's okay.



Lightnin, where did you ever get any solid evidence that I either thought, hoped or expected my more aggressive posts to impress most people, much less "everyone"?

Sorry, bub. For whatever reason, you're projecting your own thoughts onto me, because I never had any intention of impressing the majority of people on these boards. Many younger people have encouraged me in my ongoing crusade for truth, but what has been even more encouraging and inspiring is the praise I've received from people who are older and who have demonstrated comparable intelligence and verbal capacity. I value quality over quantity when it comes to supporters and friends. You think I'm trying to win a popularity contest here? You think I'm trying merely to impress the general population of these boards? If that was the case, don't you think I'd have made a greater effort to suppress my true opinions and attitudes? Well, that ain't gonna happen any time soon. The few people who respect me here are those that do so freely, not because of any "bullying" on my part.

Whether you believe it or not, most of my passionate posts on these boards actually stem from my real-life moral beliefs. When people behave like sheep and give blind devotion to an authority figure who is committing an injustice, that is wrong and I will never keep silent about it just because mine is the unpopular opinion. Maybe you think that the messages given on these boards are completely isolated and only germane to superhero movies, comics and whatever else this board may be about. That's not the case. Everything humans do is connected to a bigger trend. Human behavior is very consistent in a lot of ways. The flaws in people's thinking with regard to these movies and comics are the same basic flaws that keep humanity from reaching their full potential in the real world. I'm sure you've got a smart-aleck remark for all that, and that's fine. I'm not interested in defending my philosophy to people who can't understand it or respect it.

You might want to think a little harder before you assign motives to my actions, Lightnin. As of now, you're way off.

You can cut the transparent piety Herr. We are adults here.

I have always respected you for your desire to want the best from these films. But that is not the problem. The issue is your habit of being inflammatory and rude while delivering your thoughts. Do you realize just how condescending you are in your posts to others, even when it is not warranted? Why don't you check your posting record and see just how many times per page you pride yourself on insulting fellow Hypsters?

Case in point: Up until last week, I have never really crossed paths with you subjectwise. And I've never attacked you as person. But check your responses to me. Do you notice a pattern Herr? You don't simply attack statements I've made (which you are more than entitled to do) but for some reason you can't seem to stop there: Instead you feel some need to also attack my credibility and insult my intelligence as a human being in the same breath--with every breath. What accounts for that?

Seems to me you're trying to goad certain posters into conflicts. Now, you can say "That's not my purpose" but guess what Herr? >gasp!< You can save your bullshyt!!! . Why? Because your actions speak otherwise. Any normal person would agree that labeling other fans as "Smegmaliths", "ignorant", "unsophisticated" "sheep" with "blind" devotion is coarse and tactless. It appears that you only treat fans cordially if their views align with yours, and if they don't, they somehow deserve a bashing from you. Well....who...the....hell....are...you? That is egotistical hypocrisy at its best Herr.

So if anyone is 'off' here it is you Herr. News Flash: Just because the views of others doesn't match your personal outlook doesn't mean they as people are somehow subservant to you.

 

[Caliber]

You can cut the transparent piety Herr. We are adults here.

I have always respected you for your desire to want the best from these films. But that is not the problem. The issue is your habit of being inflammatory and rude while delivering your thoughts. Do you realize just how condescending you are in your posts to others, even when it is not warranted? Why don't you check your posting record and see just how many times per page you pride yourself on insulting fellow Hypsters?

Case in point: Up until last week, I have never really crossed paths with you subjectwise. And I've never attacked you as person. But check your responses to me. Do you notice a pattern Herr? You don't simply attack statements I've made (which you are more than entitled to do) but for some reason you can't seem to stop there: Instead you feel some need to also attack my credibility and insult my intelligence as a human being in the same breath--with every breath. What accounts for that?

Seems to me you're trying to goad certain posters into conflicts. Now, you can say "That's not my purpose" but guess what Herr? >gasp!< You can save your bullshyt!!! . Why? Because your actions speak otherwise. Any normal person would agree that labeling other fans as "Smegmaliths", "ignorant", "unsophisticated" "sheep" with "blind" devotion is coarse and tactless. It appears that you only treat fans cordially if their views align with yours, and if they don't, they somehow deserve a bashing from you. Well....who...the....hell....are...you? That is egotistical hypocrisy at its best Herr.

So if anyone is 'off' here it is you Herr. News Flash: Just because the views of others doesn't match your personal outlook doesn't mean they as people are somehow subservant to you.

Finally someone told Herr Logan that.

 

[Herr Logan]

You can cut the transparent piety Herr. We are adults here.

I have always respected you for your desire to want the best from these films. But that is not the problem. The issue is your habit of being inflammatory and rude while delivering your thoughts. Do you realize just how condescending you are in your posts to others, even when it is not warranted? Why don't you check your posting record and see just how many times per page you pride yourself on insulting fellow Hypsters?

Case in point: Up until last week, I have never really crossed paths with you subjectwise. And I've never attacked you as person. But check your responses to me. Do you notice a pattern Herr? You don't simply attack statements I've made (which you are more than entitled to do) but for some reason you can't seem to stop there: Instead you feel some need to also attack my credibility and insult my intelligence as a human being in the same breath--with every breath. What accounts for that?

Seems to me you're trying to goad certain posters into conflicts. Now, you can say "That's not my purpose" but guess what Herr? >gasp!< You can save your bullshyt!!! . Why? Because your actions speak otherwise. Any normal person would agree that labeling other fans as "Smegmaliths", "ignorant", "unsophisticated" "sheep" with "blind" devotion is coarse and tactless. It appears that you only treat fans cordially if their views align with yours, and if they don't, they somehow deserve a bashing from you. Well....who...the....hell....are...you? That is egotistical hypocrisy at its best Herr.

So if anyone is 'off' here it is you Herr. News Flash: Just because the views of others doesn't match your personal outlook doesn't mean they as people are somehow subservant to you.

You're still generalizing quite a bit, and still making presumptions on which you have no authority. I will say that this post is less inaccurate than the last one, though.

Do I realize how condescending I am to others? Of course I do. Do I realize that it isn't always warranted? I often do after the fact and I've made an effort to own up to it. I don't make admissions of being wrong when I'm not, so just because a person thinks I was out of line, that's not good enough. I have to believe that's the case. When it is the case, I apologize. Like I said, I care about the truth and accuracy more than most other things in life. If you tell me something inaccurate, I'm going to call you on it, and depending on how forcefully you tell me an untruth may determine how forceful my response will be. If I've acted unjustly and been given the opportunity to assess whether or not that's the case, it would be a lie to deny it. I realize how subjective the truth is among various people, but I can only work with what I have-- my own mind and the facts.

The idea that everyone's opinion is equally valid-- especially in relation to an individual who is assessing that validity-- is ludicrous. The idea that opinions can't be criticized is childish and beneath contempt on an intellectual level. Attitudes can't be criticized with any validity, because they are merely preferences. I try never to insult someone or their statement if all they are doing is stating their preferences (i.e.: I liked this movie), because there is no argument for that except for "No, you didn't like it." An opinion is a statement of fact as an individual perceives it. That's fair game, and I won't debase myself by buying into this idiotic "every has opinions" nonsense as a reason to refrain from speaking my mind. If I believe strongly that something isn't true, I'm going to say so, and if someone else can't give a valid argument against my own, then they give my regards to the lower links in the cognitive food chain.

If you're simply writing what I said before off as "transparent piety," then I'm not sure what point there is in trying to make you understand that which you clearly do not understand about me. I meant what I said. I'm not here to win a popularity contest, and if you insist that's the case one more time, I will have irrefutable proof that you're an intellectual plebeian who is lazy and misguided in his thinking. If you can expend just a minute amount of brain power for just a second and see that the very idea of my vying for popularity on a board predominately full of people with opinions different from my own is ridiculous, then we need not revisit that argument. I also meant what I said about the behavior on this board reflecting the most impactful behaviors in the world. If you can't immediately see what I mean by that, I'm not sure I should bother discussing any of this with you further. All I know is, I have a president that was elected based on false information and blind faith, so nobody can ever tell me that the sheep mentality we see on messaging boards isn't horrifyingly destructive when used in politics and expect me to see them as a worthwhile organism. I have no use for people that are that ignorant and I literally resent them for breathing my air.

Have a nice day.

 

[Herr Logan]

Finally someone told Herr Logan that.

Aw, you could have done it, Trent. You're as smart as Lightnin, aren't you?

Just messin', buddy. I wouldn't want you to pretend you're something you're not.

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

You're still generalizing quite a bit, and still making presumptions on which you have no authority. I will say that this post is less inaccurate than the last one, though.

Do I realize how condescending I am to others? Of course I do. Do I realize that it isn't always warranted? I often do after the fact and I've made an effort to own up to it. I don't make admissions of being wrong when I'm not, so just because a person thinks I was out of line, that's not good enough. I have to believe that's the case. When it is the case, I apologize. Like I said, I care about the truth and accuracy more than most other things in life. If you tell me something inaccurate, I'm going to call you on it, and depending on how forcefully you tell me an untruth may determine how forceful my response will be. If I've acted unjustly and been given the opportunity to assess whether or not that's the case, it would be a lie to deny it. I realize how subjective the truth is among various people, but I can only work with what I have-- my own mind and the facts.

The idea that everyone's opinion is equally valid-- especially in relation to an individual who is assessing that validity-- is ludicrous. The idea that opinions can't be criticized is childish and beneath contempt on an intellectual level. Attitudes can't be criticized with any validity, because they are merely preferences. I try never to insult someone or their statement if all they are doing is stating their preferences (i.e.: I liked this movie), because there is no argument for that except for "No, you didn't like it." An opinion is a statement of fact as an individual perceives it. That's fair game, and I won't debase myself by buying into this idiotic "every has opinions" nonsense as a reason to refrain from speaking my mind. If I believe strongly that something isn't true, I'm going to say so, and if someone else can't give a valid argument against my own, then they give my regards to the lower links in the cognitive food chain.

If you're simply writing what I said before off as "transparent piety," then I'm not sure what point there is in trying to make you understand that which you clearly do not understand about me. I meant what I said. I'm not here to win a popularity contest, and if you insist that's the case one more time, I will have irrefutable proof that you're an intellectual plebeian who is lazy and misguided in his thinking. If you can expend just a minute amount of brain power for just a second and see that the very idea of my vying for popularity on a board predominately full of people with opinions different from my own is ridiculous, then we need not revisit that argument. I also meant what I said about the behavior on this board reflecting the most impactful behaviors in the world. If you can't immediately see what I mean by that, I'm not sure I should bother discussing any of this with you further. All I know is, I have a president that was elected based on false information and blind faith, so nobody can ever tell me that the sheep mentality we see on messaging boards isn't horrifyingly destructive when used in politics and expect me to see them as a worthwhile organism. I have no use for people that are that ignorant and I literally resent them for breathing my air.

Have a nice day.

No one is talking about your views Herr. Most of us respect those--and you know I've supported some of your views. The subject at hand is the way you communicate them. Um, are you deliberately missing my points about your unwarranted rude approach to others?

The reality is people have stated their opinions tactfully and you've come out the box ripping them apart as if they said something about your mother. But the comical thing about it is...you know I'm telling you the truth Herr. I mean, let's be real here--do I need to quote you? There's so many examples to substantiate what I'm saying.

At any rate, it seems we are experiencing a case of selective amnesia here, and personally I'm done with it. I had to "take it there" today because something needed to be said, and I've said all that I can on this matter. Take from it what you will.

 

[Herr Logan]

No one is talking about your views Herr. Most of us respect those--and you know I've supported some of your views. The subject at hand is the way you communicate them. Um, are you deliberately missing my points about your unwarranted rude approach to others?

The reality is people have stated their opinions tactfully and you've come out the box ripping them apart as if they said something about your mother. But the comical thing about it is...you know I'm telling you the truth Herr. I mean, let's be real here--do I need to quote you? There's so many examples to substantiate what I'm saying.

At any rate, it seems we are experiencing a case of selective amnesia here, and personally I'm done with it. I had to "take it there" today because something needed to be said, and I've said all that I can on this matter. Take from it what you will.

Let me put it plainly: just because you think someone's statement is tactful, respectful and beyond reproach doesn't make it so. Therefore, just because you think my remarks are unwarranted does not make it so.

Considering how many people instantly attacked me when I tactfully voiced my displeasure with regard to superhero movies, how many times I've been called a "whining fanboy" and "purist geek"-- I feel precisely zero compulsion to show false reverence for opinions I think are trash. When I no longer see conformist sheep bleating those words at me and my ilk, that's when I'll become Mr. Sunshine just for you.

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

Let me put it plainly: just because you think someone's statement is tactful, respectful and beyond reproach doesn't make it so. Therefore, just because you think my remarks are unwarranted does not make it so.

Considering how many people instantly attacked me when I tactfully voiced my displeasure with regard to superhero movies, how many times I've been called a "whining fanboy" and "purist geek"-- I feel precisely zero compulsion to show false reverence for opinions I think are trash. When I no longer see conformist sheep bleating those words at me and my ilk, that's when I'll because Mr. Sunshine just for you.

So are you saying you're some sort of martyr? You lash out at these kids because you are angry at the cruel, cruel world of SHH?

And please, don't think I am making light of your statements--believe me when I say that the only reason I have continued discussing this is because I am honestly trying to figure out where you are coming from.

Personally I've never called you anything, but that sure didn't stop you from hurling insults anyway. So your statements above are confusing--it can't be solely about the content of the posts if you are disrespecting the poster who makes them too. I just can't buy that. Even if you feel a person is "a sheep" why is there a need to trash them because you don't agree with them? Do you honestly believe such harsh treatment will win them over to your arguement? If anything such insults only take the person's focus off the merit of what you've said, and focused it solely on you and your character.

That seems self-defeating to me Herr.

 

[wobbly]

Yet its still easier to use a normal mold if what you are saying is the look the movie is using in the first place. And a car is a lot different from a little action figure.

And maybe they didn't? The Thing Car and Thing astronaut suit are irrelevant, we're talking about THIS toy, depicting the FINAL SCENE, and these toys that show scenes have been proven as insights to what happens in the movie, this happened with SM2.

The Thing toy looks like the comic version because: There is no point to make a different strong man mold. And whether you can't see the painfully obvious brow that is on movie Things face is your problem, not the toys.



The same action dolls that show Doom with skin still on his hands? This shows these action dolls aren't Doom at the end of his transformation. And i hear they're keeping the cape thing secret.. why put it on a lego toy then? Because no one will take a lego toy seriously.. proof of this? Your reaction.

Your first wish has came true, because the Thing looks classic all the way throughout this movie. Isn't that brow huge? Oh wait, you can't see it for some reason. Oh well.

Look Saph...if you want to believe that there will be a cape based on that pic of the lego toy that's up to you. I've given you the reasons why I disagree, presented with no sarcasm or derision of your point of view I might add, so that is that, no conclusions either way as we have no proof one way or another atm, and no big deal either.
We will find out in due time if your apparently certain faith in the matter is justified, and if it is I will gladly applaud you on your foresight.

I do however take a little exception to your throwing that sarcastic "Oh wait, you can't see it for some reason" nonsense at me...again. You did this is another thread and I already answered you there very clearly about that. By trying that same line again I can only suspect you are trying to deliberately antagonise a less than savoury response, but if that is indeed your intent I will pass.

All I will say is this: Most fans here have no absolutley no problem realising exactly what the complaint of the 'browbeaters' has been from the moment we first saw the suit. It does not, or certainly should not, require any further explanation here.

 

[Herr Logan]

So are you saying you're some sort of martyr? You lash out at these kids because you are angry at the cruel, cruel world of SHH?

And please, don't think I am making light of your statements--believe me when I say that the only reason I have continued discussing this is because I am honestly trying to figure out where you are coming from.

Personally I've never called you anything, but that sure didn't stop you from hurling insults anyway. So your statements above are confusing--it can't be solely about the content of the posts if you are disrespecting the poster who makes them too. I just can't buy that. Even if you feel a person is "a sheep" why is there a need to trash them because you don't agree with them? Do you honestly believe such harsh treatment will win them over to your arguement? If anything such insults only take the person's focus off the merit of what you've said, and focused it solely on you and your character.

That seems self-defeating to me Herr.

As memories go, mine is pretty flawed, so I may not recall everything in perfect order. I'm pretty sure that when I first had exchanges with you, I didn't full-out attack you personally. It may well be the case that I witnessed more and more heated arguments being exchanged between you and people who hold views more similar to my own, and as my participation in one of your threads continued, people with less intelligence and tact than you attacked me personally. I may have gotten nastier during that progression. As for what happened in Wetgorilla's thread, I make no apologies. Not only had a swarm of plebeians and degenerates invaded and polluted that thread before I could even contribute something revelant, but you yourself came in with derisive declarations and petty comparisons to your own thread. I think you were out of line in that situation, but you certainly weren't the worst.

Since things have calmed down a bit in that thread, I see no reason to maintain a steadily intensifying trend of nastiness. At least until the next big catalyst comes along to spark a new outbreak of animosity.

I appreciate your sincerety and efforts to determine my position in all this. On the whole, I'm not trying to convince people that are ultimately dedicated to their opposing arguments. I'm expressing myself in an earnest fashion, and the most productive results of that could be people with similar opinions speaking up and contributing their take on it all and/or people who aren't dead set on one way of thinking or another asking questions and trying to learn more about the issues at hand. I'm not out to impress people who aren't predisposed to my way of thinking; my statements and arguments appeal to a select audience that I am happy to entertain or inspire if at all possible. As for the effect my presence has on those that outright disagree with me, I can only hope that my adversarial nature prompts others to work harder in their argumentation and analytical thinking. One can learn far more from conflict than they can through blind agreement and false niceties.

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

As memories go, mine is pretty flawed, so I may not recall everything in perfect order. I'm pretty sure that when I first had exchanges with you, I didn't full-out attack you personally. It may well be the case that I witnessed more and more heated arguments being exchanged between you and people who hold views more similar to my own, and as my participation in one of your threads continued, people with less intelligence and tact than you attacked me personally. I may have gotten nastier during that progression. As for what happened in Wetgorilla's thread, I make no apologies. Not only had a swarm of plebeians and degenerates invaded and polluted that thread before I could even contribute something revelant, but you yourself came in with derisive declarations and petty comparisons to your own thread. I think you were out of line in that situation, but you certainly weren't the worst.

Since things have calmed down a bit in that thread, I see no reason to maintain a steadily intensifying trend of nastiness. At least until the next big catalyst comes along to spark a new outbreak of animosity.

I appreciate your sincerety and efforts to determine my position in all this. On the whole, I'm not trying to convince people that are ultimately dedicated to their opposing arguments. I'm expressing myself in an earnest fashion, and the most productive results of that could be people with similar opinions speaking up and contributing their take on it all and/or people who aren't dead set on one way of thinking or another asking questions and trying to learn more about the issues at hand. I'm not out to impress people who aren't predisposed to my way of thinking; my statements and arguments appeal to a select audience that I am happy to entertain or inspire if at all possible. As for the effect my presence has on those that outright disagree with me, I can only hope that my adversarial nature prompts others to work harder in their argumentation and analytical thinking. One can learn far more from conflict than they can through blind agreement and false niceties.

Fair enough Herr.

I believe I've gotten a clearer insight on where you're coming from. That's not to say I necessarily agree with the way you communicate your views sometimes (I still believe some finesse would go a long way towards promoting peaceful relations) but as I stated before, in of themselves, I've always respected your views, and will continue to do so.

Until we cross paths again...

 

[Head>On<Collider]

Orange, don't you leave me, too.

That's right, Franklin-- fantasize all you want, you filthy little smegmalith.

Still here. Still breathing....




In spite of all the verbal pollution!!!

I'm just now catching up.....and yes, it's a comfort to know I'm not alone here fighting an uphill battle! Life's been good and bad to me in an extreme way the last couple of days, but I'm back in black, ready to kick a$$, take names, and sign racks!

Some people just don't get it and they choose not to. On top of that they go all out to make people like you and I to look like they really are. Is it fair? No, it's life and we have every right to be angry at much much more than just the SHH world only; yet we're too decent to lower ourselves to the level we really ought to. Why? Because people make up these boards. The same type of people I have to put up with when I go out into the world trying to live life, buy food, work my job, go to parties, etc. These hypocritical bastards who are full of $hit a hundred times over are just flat out lucky they fall through the cracks of "peace and order" so they can do what they do with forked tongues appearing to be good. I see through them and they don't like that I won't go into denial about their kind.

BTW, I'm equally glad not everyone is like them, but the ones who are genuine are indeed outnumbered.

 

[Head>On<Collider]

So? Toys can be faithful to the movie.. and why would they bother adding a cape if they didn't need to. It takes more work.

Actually, the good point you have Saph is that Avi wouldn't allow the lego toy with the cape to be released if it weren't in the movie. He is that powerful, and it's too far out of character for him to do otherwise.

 

[Sardaukar]

I'm bumping this ****.

 

[Herr Logan]

Still here. Still breathing....




In spite of all the verbal pollution!!!

I'm just now catching up.....and yes, it's a comfort to know I'm not alone here fighting an uphill battle! Life's been good and bad to me in an extreme way the last couple of days, but I'm back in black, ready to kick a$$, take names, and sign racks!

Some people just don't get it and they choose not to. On top of that they go all out to make people like you and I to look like they really are. Is it fair? No, it's life and we have every right to be angry at much much more than just the SHH world only; yet we're too decent to lower ourselves to the level we really ought to. Why? Because people make up these boards. The same type of people I have to put up with when I go out into the world trying to live life, buy food, work my job, go to parties, etc. These hypocritical bastards who are full of $hit a hundred times over are just flat out lucky they fall through the cracks of "peace and order" so they can do what they do with forked tongues appearing to be good. I see through them and they don't like that I won't go into denial about their kind.

BTW, I'm equally glad not everyone is like them, but the ones who are genuine are indeed outnumbered.

Orange, would you consider us martyrs? That's what Lightnin asked me earlier. What's your take on that?

 

[Head>On<Collider]

Orange, would you consider us martyrs? That's what Lightnin asked me earlier. What's your take on that?

To be a martyr, you must die, suffer, be tortured or be something pathetic. Are we dead? Not by a long shot! Are we willing to look bad for a greater cause, you're damn right!

 

[wetgorilla]

He swings through the air in a high arch,.....twists like a circus acrobat performing for a crowd of hundreds..... and lands on the jungle floor!

From out of the shadows emerges......Wetgorilla. LOL

Hey, fellas. Whatcha two martyrs been up to?

Wetgorilla


By the way, concerning Doom's cape - I'm of the opinion Lego has manufactured Doom with a cape simply because it is easier to create a cape onto a little figurine rather than an actual cowl. An example of this would be when Kenner created an Obi-Wan-Kenobi action figure with a cap back in the 70's although a cowl was worn.

 

[Head>On<Collider]

What's up WG? I have a question for someone objective to answer: Observe the two comparisons, one's wearing spats and the other has goat hooves. One's Ultimate Doom, one's movie Doom(the toy actually). Is it me, or is there any comparison?

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5137866&postcount=1822

 

[wetgorilla]

What's up WG? I have a question for someone objective to answer: Observe the two comparisons, one's wearing spats and the other has goat hooves. One's Ultimate Doom, one's movie Doom(the toy actually). Is it me, or is there any comparison?

http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showpost.php?p=5137866&postcount=1822

It's not just you. I had to take a second look myself. The spats do look a lot like hooves from the angle the photograph was taken and already having UFF Doom drawn with hooves, wasn't helping to clear things.

Wetgorilla

 

[Head>On<Collider]

It's not just you. I had to take a second look myself. The spats do look a lot like hooves from the angle the photograph was taken and already having UFF Doom drawn with hooves, wasn't helping to clear things.

Wetgorilla

Just checking

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

Just checking

Hey, when are you releasing the poll on this matter?

By the way, here's another shot...the lighting is a bit improved here.

 

[Ant-Man]

^^^^^^^^^
Doesn't look as bad as some of the other shots. He looks pretty cool there. The Jacket doesn't look as wierd to me anymore. And the mask is DOOM.

 

[Sardaukar]

I don't get the hands.

It's like they've got a frosty side and a wheaty side.

Which one's better?

 

[Lightning Strykez!]

I don't get the hands.

It's like they've got a frosty side and a wheaty side.

Which one's better?

It's confusing because didn't Victor's hand look like it was completely metal (both sides) in the original teaser (parking structure scene)?

 

[Ant-Man]

I don't get the hands.

It's like they've got a frosty side and a wheaty side.

Which one's better?

Frosty side. Everyone knows that.