SuperFerret
King of the Urban Jungle
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2004
- Messages
- 33,639
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 58
You don't gorillas would rather enjoy swinging through miles of vine, or a lion ruling the animal kingdom and leader of a pride, or a killer whale exploring the whole world instead of doing dumb tricks?
They might, but it's actually helpful to their species that those individuals are in captivity, at the very least for exposing people to those species in the first place.
My views on conservation are complex and vary depending on the scale we're talking about and how much emotion we're going to include in the discussion, but it has always seemed to me that the average person on the most basic level really only cares that tigers/pandas/polar bears/(insert endangered species here) might go extinct based solely on the fact that they were exposed to them as children, usually via zoos. You, and the dip****s who share this view, want to cut all future conservation movements off at the legs.
Going full-on animal rights kind of sounds like a good idea on paper ("all animals are free from human involvement") but it doesn't work at all when confronted with reality. I mean, why do you want to cut one species off from the ecosystem so fully that they are not allowed to interact with their fellow species at all? Nevermind the fact that it's very much a fringe thing, and the overwhelming majority of humanity is tolerant and well-intentioned towards other species AT THE VERY, MOST BLINDINGLY OPTIMISTICALLY, BEST. (Hell, it sucks to be a human in many human societies, nevermind what it's like to be a dog.)
I don't really have any other points, and I've kind of rambled, so I'll just end this by stating that not only do I disagree with you, I look down upon any who share your opinions to the extreme that you do.