The Dark Knight Rises IESB: Script is IN!

Reese should NOT be The Riddler

and

Edward should NOT be a Fed.
 
I'm glad to hear Jonah's working on the script again, but the inclusion of David Goyer leaves somewhat of a bad taste in my mouth. I can't really comment on anything else 'til we get more news.
 
Ummm Goyer worked on TDK too. He's a great idea man/comic expert. His screen writing is weaker though, but the Nolan's have always been there to correct that. And that is the same set up they had with TDK. Just Chris helped with Begins. But both brothers including Goyer helped with TDK.
 
I'm still wondering why anyone is acting so worried about Goyer as if he had nothing to do with BB and TDK and suddenly his addition to B3 is this disaster waiting to happen. :whatever: C'mon now.
 
Yeah seriously.

Without Goyer, Scarecrow wouldn't have worn a mask.
 
I hate Goyer, he is evil. He ruined BB with a bit of bad dialogue and 2 dudes ranting on about the main water hub. KILL HIM!!!
 
I hate Goyer, he is evil. He ruined BB with a bit of bad dialogue and 2 dudes ranting on about the main water hub. KILL HIM!!!

Chris Nolan got equal screenwriting credit and had the last word on what was in the movie.

If Nolan wanted to change it, he would have.
 
I'm still wondering why anyone is acting so worried about Goyer as if he had nothing to do with BB and TDK and suddenly his addition to B3 is this disaster waiting to happen. :whatever: C'mon now.

Chris Nolan got equal screenwriting credit and had the last word on what was in the movie.

If Nolan wanted to change it, he would have.

Yeah seriously.

Without Goyer, Scarecrow wouldn't have worn a mask.
Agreed, on all points.
 
Whoever hates on Goyer need to chill. Goyer is there because he is the expert of the group, Nolan is there to prevent Goyer getting too carried away.
 
I was being sarcastic. I dont get that hate either,I honestly cant understand it.
 
Goyer was Nolan's guide to the Batman comics and without him, Nolan would have probably given us a batman without a cape and grapple gun. It was Goyer after all that convinced him otherwise.
Besides, Nolan was the director, he had the final say on everything, and he let those one liners in, so its his fault.
 
Goyer was Nolan's guide to the Batman comics and without him, Nolan would have probably given us a batman without a cape and grapple gun. It was Goyer after all that convinced him otherwise.
Besides, Nolan was the director, he had the final say on everything, and he let those one liners in, so its his fault.

Yep, they're a good combination. One of them knows how to direct and tell stories really well. The other is far more knowledgeable on the Batman mythology.
 
Besides, the two waterpipe dudes, while cheesy, were used to up the tension of the scene. They were supposed to be ordinary folks dealing with extraordinary situations like these. You need people looking up in the sky and going: "wow, i saw a dude flying", or "wth, a tank just flew over rooftops" to underline the peculiarity of the situation. These events are supposed to be extraordinary. If nobody reacts to them that way, they become ordinary.
 
Having them say the same thing repeatedly between the showdown of hero and villain doesn't make the scene extraordinary. If anything, it takes you out of the moment because it becomes distracting and annoying.

Like all the annoying extras in the climax fight sequence in Spider-Man 3. Between the stupid kids, and the british reporter, it just completely takes you out of the moment.
 
Having them say the same thing repeatedly between the showdown of hero and villain doesn't make the scene extraordinary. If anything, it takes you out of the moment because it becomes distracting and annoying.

It didn't distract or annoy me, it hasn't any single time of the dozens and dozens of times I've sat through the film. It seemed normal.

Or maybe I'm just not prone to overreacting to anything I can get my hands on.

I will say it's very Madden though. :funny:
 
It bugged me. The use of slack jawed civilians in climaxes like that is always an irritation. Just show them once. That's enough. Having them constantly interject with the same lines is BS.
 
It didn't distract or annoy me, it hasn't any single time of the dozens and dozens of times I've sat through the film. It seemed normal.

Lucky you. I'm not as harsh on the third act of Begins as most people are. I actually quite enjoyed it. But those water pressure guys were a pain in the ass.

We get it, guys, the water pressure is going to blow. Be quiet now.

Or maybe I'm just not prone to overreacting to anything I can get my hands on.

Or you're just more tolerant to annoying extras :cwink:
 
Well, the part that Commissioner Loeb is astonished by the sight of Batman being towed by the monorail was a lot better than the waterpipe guys. There should always be ordinary guys to underline the "WTF" factor of the situation, but i agree that those guys werent done that well. Nor was the "nice ride" guy. It would have been better if Nolan showed us various pedestrians running away as the Batmobile was blowing **** up.
Loeb was a lot more convincing and i also liked the guard of the car park that looks at his coffee when the Batmobile zooms by. It was both effective and hilarious!
 
Or you're just more tolerant to annoying extras :cwink:

:funny:

I guess I'm always too focused on the action to even really give a crap what the guy is saying so I don't pay him much mind. Plus he's just stating the obvious, so he might as well just be random background noise.

Even though I didn't mind, I agree that it was unnecessary and I wouldn't encourage a repeat of that kind of thing.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,480
Messages
22,115,757
Members
45,907
Latest member
DrJonathanCrane
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"