• The upgrade to XenForo 2.3.7 has now been completed. Please report any issues to our administrators.

Im still skeptical as to how...

ha, you don't have to worry about any of that...

look at all the stories they managed to fit into the last stand...

the whole pheonix saga
scott's death/going missing (i have faith)
The whole cure
the enlisting on pretty much a brand new brotherhood
Warren worthington's relationship with his father and the cure
Rogue's relationship with bobby and her taking the cure
Pyro's and Iceman's tension build up.
Wolverine's love for jean
Xavier's tactile death and ressurection.
Magneto getting his powers back
Henry McCoy's build up.
Mystique's betrayal
Storm and wolverine's abilities to become school and mission leaders

basically the last stand covered a lot more ground than spidey has too and it did it in much less time. Now a lot of people will go on and say that the last stand didn't do this well BUT this is because of the quality of the scenes they had rather than the Quantity of the scenes they had. I could give a re-treatment for every scene in that film shown and provide a much more coherent story, heck i'd even cut a few out, which would leave me with only a mildly longer film and still be able to cover all the points the film wanted to (as well as tie things in to future movies and tie up some loose plot ends).

I think a lot of people are used to having unnecessary scenes in alot of these comic book movies. Maybe it's all of these six/twelve part story arcs marvel has been putting out, what happened to a great story being told in a single issue or even 2. Animation shows complex stories can be told in limited times, heck Spiderman 2 could have been done in 40 mins and touched all the same points. That's a whole nother 190 minutes of story telling available.

when you think of it like this, i don't see how bringing all these aspects can seem like a cramming exercise. It just means a potentially higher quallity film with no laps in entertainment.

but again, whenever has a comic book film used the most of its potential.
 
It will about 2:20 long.

First Act

First 20-30 mins is explaining Peters relationship with MJ, Harry, Eddie, Gwen, Aunt May. As well as Spider-Man day, introduction to Eddie Brock, Peter discovering Sandman killed Uncle Ben, Peter asking MJ to marry, Sandman's birth and Peter getting the symbiot.

In this time we will see two fight scenes; Spider-Man vs Sandman and Peter vs Harry.

Second Act.

Peter discovering the symbiot, Peter driving MJ away and her going to Harry for support, Peter/Spider-Man ruining Eddies life

Only one fight scene

Symbiote Spider-Man vs Sandman


Third Act

Venom is born teams up with Sandman and kidnaps MJ (again), Peter asks Harry for help to stop them, battle royal, Sandman, Eddie and Harry dies and Harrys funeral.

Two fight scenes

Spider-Man vs Venom
Spider-Man and Harry vs. Venom and Sandman.
 
i really dont want to remind you about SR. i just hope that sony and raimi already have a plan. i dont want to found out in the theater that hte movie has deleted scenes only to make it short.

looking at the trailer and Q&A this is a 2:30.


lets not forget about SR.
 
Where do you guys get this crazy idea to how long this film is, when fact of the matter is that it hasn't been adressed NOR rumored anywhere.. BUT! What has been said is from Kirsten Dunst! She say that spider-man 3 is a VERY long movie! She didn't say how long, but LONG! That means more then 2 hours & 15 minutes! WHY??? because spidey 2 was 2 hours & 15 minutes, so spider-man 3 must be AT THE LEAST 2 hours & 15 minutes - AND MORE... if not, it would make absolutely no sense of Dunst to say that to begin with...

I wouldn't be surprised if "SPIDER-MAN 3" will be around the 2 hours & 40 minute mark.
 
Only two characters need a back story - Eddie and Sandman.

Gwen will get the shaft, and the three principle characters - Peter, MJ and Harry... well we already know all about them. ;)
 
Naite22 said:
Where do you guys get this crazy idea to how long this film is, when fact of the matter is that it hasn't been adressed NOR rumored anywhere.. BUT! What has been said is from Kirsten Dunst! She say that spider-man 3 is a VERY long movie! She didn't say how long, but LONG! That means more then 2 hours & 15 minutes! WHY??? because spidey 2 was 2 hours & 15 minutes, so spider-man 3 must be AT THE LEAST 2 hours & 15 minutes - AND MORE... if not, it would make absolutely no sense of Dunst to say that to begin with...

I wouldn't be surprised if "SPIDER-MAN 3" will be around the 2 hours & 40 minute mark.

I don't think the movie could be any longer than 2 and a half hours, and that's very long.
 
War Party said:
Could be more than 2 hrs.

I hope it won't be more than 150 mins (it will be overdose like was LOTR, Titanic and KK).
 
KK, yes. LOTR, no.

I say 150-155 minutes would be awesome. We can hae a superhero epic. We do realize that STM was around that and BB was 140 some minutes too. And if the studio is worried about "length = no profits" they need to realize that if the movie is good it will work. See Narnia, POTC1, HP and of course LOTR. ****, even bad movies like POTC2 can still rake in the cash at a lengthy film.
 
Disagreed.

I think it will hurt movie, because usual superhero film should be 125-145 mins.

Everything, what is more than 145 mins will look boring.
 
Pfft. BB was what 144? 155 is not that much more. LOTR were all over 3 hours, Episode III was over 150 minutes as were both POTC the more successful Harry Potters and Narnia.

Don't cut it for the impatient and ADD crowd.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,263
Messages
22,074,739
Members
45,875
Latest member
kedenlewis
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"