Slushy
Superhero
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2008
- Messages
- 8,803
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Edit:
Too bad.
I'm not gonna to put that as a Con against a movie
Too bad.
Last edited:
I'm not gonna to put that as a Con against a movie
My wife loved the first one and forced me to go watch this with her tonight and I wish I had walked out.
On the bright side,
Rating: 2/10
I don't see any similarities to MBJ or Woodley.
As for everyone being able to pilot the alien ships. Their own ships are based on the alien tech from the 1st invasion. That annoying "I want to bang the hot Chinese chick" kid said the control system were still the same from 1996 alien ships.
Another bright moment was seeing the late Robert Loggia on the big screen one last time. He was the Marine General in 1996.
Color me more than confused because just less than 3 hrs you stated you haven't seen it, yet here you're acting like you have by calling out minutes and everything - for someone who just hours before says they haven't seen it... Weird.
What the hell are you talking about?
I think this movie failed to do what recent movies like jurassic world and the force awakens did. Do a soft reboot and tredge old territory with interesting new characters. The effects were top notch and the action was solid but everything else was boring and flat.
So, I trust you gentlemen more than the critics, as a dumb fun popcorn film does this film work? Is it worth seeing in theater or just wait to rent it?
Hemsworth should've been eliminated and merge his arc with Will Smith's son, Dylan. Dylan didn't have any arc nor did he get with the girl. That's why he was so boring: he had nothing to do.
It feels like a step back doesn it from ID4? That movie wasn't afraid to have Smith as the lead and didn't require a blond dude to be the placeholder.
So, I trust you gentlemen more than the critics, as a dumb fun popcorn film does this film work? Is it worth seeing in theater or just wait to rent it?
So, I trust you gentlemen more than the critics, as a dumb fun popcorn film does this film work? Is it worth seeing in theater or just wait to rent it?
Exactly Dylan was useless. In fact it's really weird that they have the offspring of two of the bigger original characters and they're regulated to the side in favor of generic Jerry Liam Hemsworth. And again, I thought Hemsworth gave a fine performance. The way it was written was just lame to me.
Shouldve made the main characters Dylan and the President's daughter. Platanoic partnership. HAve Dylan be funny but not cocky or reckless. And maybe his arc is trying to live up to his father's name.
Or just ignore the children. I think it's better if you just use new characters instead of making everyone "so and so's kid"
you forgot dinosaurs. every year we get alien attack movies or movies with similar action scenes. dinosaurs stand out in summer.I think reason the Jurassic World worked so well for audiences is that it actually made you felt like you were watching Jurassic Park again. The aesthetic and style were similar. It hit the nostalgia notes of the first one better than the lesser perceived sequels. It also had more fun and appealing characters in it than the sequels did.
It's far from a perfect movie, but it was better made than a film like Resurgence was.
I maintain that ID4 was a classic, groundbreaking movie of its era. Resurgence I think wanted to play the Jurassic World role, but it simply couldn't.

So, I trust you gentlemen more than the critics, as a dumb fun popcorn film does this film work? Is it worth seeing in theater or just wait to rent it?