In other words "I'm right, you're wrong, nuff said." Your whole post pretty much reads like that.
Okay then.
Explain how I have no evidence to make such claim. Walk up to the average person on the street in any country that's seen Spider-Man and ask them what Spider-Man's name is, there's a 99.999% chance they'll say Peter Parker. Try it on the kids as well and see if they bring up Miles more than Peter. The identity is as synonymous with the character as the identity of Bruce Wayne is with Batman and that's a fact. That's not to say other characters haven't taken the mantle in the past, but that doesn't change the fact there was an definitive identity that everything eventually went back to.
Your argument could be just as applicable to Ben Reilly and Kaine. I mean, what's the difference?
I think you're mistaking the presence of another mantle with the reality of there being a definitive mantle. The Japanese made their own version, sure, as did the Indians, but that doesn't necessarily translate to that being the version they associate Spider-Man. The presence of a Japanese Spider-Man doesn't mean they don't know who the universal Spider-Man is. There's no evidence of that being the case. Spidey has been immensely popular in Japan period, both before and after the mecha show. TASM 2, just for one example, broke box office records in Japan.
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?page=intl&country=JP&id=amazingspiderman2.htm
Also as a bonus, here as some photos with Japanese kids and Andrew:
To those kids, Peter Parker is Spider-Man. Who are you to say that isn't the case? This is practically the same thing you did on the previous page, listing 2 random photos with very little context and acted as if that by itself was major evidence for anything.
Finally, no one here is arguing those Japanese versions should replace Peter Parker in the MCU. The problem isn't that other versions exist, or that a small minority out there may prefer those other versions, but that those other versions are no excuse to exclude Peter from the MCU. Peter is far more deserving to be in the MCU, for reasons already stated, and it would simply be insulting to wait all this time to get that and it not being delivered, for reasons already stated.
Not to mention it would be counter-intuitive, from both a marketing and narrative standpoint. Starting with Peter allows for both Peter and Miles to exist in the MCU (eventually) just as they are in the comics. Starting with Miles does not allow room for the same to occur, as both characters would have to be altered. Because as I stated before, Miles needs Peter in order to exist.
1. Regarding the bolded part, I just did.
2. Regarding the underlined part, I just explained how that fact is not mutually exclusive from the fact there is a definitive "universal" Spider-Man.
All your linked proved was that some people thought Green Lantern was black. Apart from skin color, what does that have to do with the content of the character?
I already explained in my previous post how JL John Stewart wasn't
really John Stewart past the name and looks, and marine background that was barely-if-ever explored (and even then, Hal has an army background as well). In terms of character, he had a lot more in common with Hal Jordan than the comic John Stewart version that hadn't done anything impressive at that particular time. They did a similar thing with the Flash in that show, calling him Wally West but practically making him Barry Allen the forensic scientist in Central City. I would argue a lot of those fans were bigger fans of Hal Jordan than they realized, as a result.
By contrast, you can't do the same with Miles. Comes from a darker background with part of his family being criminals, his uncle being a straight up evil. To him, Peter was his Uncle Ben. Peter is the one who taught him with great power comes great responsibility.
Unless you want the films to write Miles as if he was Peter. In that case, what's the point? Why not just make Peter black? It's fine if you want that, but just say it then. Don't go on and on about how starting with Miles would be a better idea than it really is.
You talk a lot about the importance of Miles, but you essentially want to change the core of both Peter AND Miles. What you're advocating isn't even Miles. It's practically a new version in almost everything but name.
Sure thing.
And while you like to brag about your point being made, I'd also like to point out the fact you've dodged almost all of my points from the last points. Including how John doesn't really need Hal like Miles needs Peter, how John never really replaced Hal in the first place, how Hal defined the mantle, how neither Hal nor John have been as associated with the GL name as Peter is with the Spider-Man name just like Batman and Superman.
