AVEITWITHJAMON
Badass Cloud
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2003
- Messages
- 42,440
- Reaction score
- 7,908
- Points
- 103
The Avengers don't care about Coulson.
They cared enough to band together and fight Loki when he died. I imagine they would want to know he is alive.
The Avengers don't care about Coulson.
They cared enough to band together and fight Loki when he died.
That was actually a joke but more to the point, they haven't brought Coulson back because the movies have gone on just fine without him. That's the thing. This notion that the MCU is somehow being seriously harmed by the lack of crossover between the movie and TV divisions only exists in the heads of certain fans.
TDW ended with Thor choosing Jane over Asgard. But in her one mention in AOU, he doesn't even seem to know where she is and then returns to Asgard like nothing ever happened. I get the "real world" reasons why it happened, but that doesn't make the storytelling any better.Can you please elaborate on the Thor/Jane thing? I'm confused. Ihave no idea what your point is here.
Would have to disagree. Even if I didn't watch AOS, I would still know Coulson was alive and still be questioning why The Avengers didn't know about it, especially from the man himself who seemed friends with at least a few of them.
My point is that Marvel's MOVIES should have different tones because the MOVIES are still the prime focus of the universe. Instead we have one expected tone for the movies and another for the Netflix shows.
TDW ended with Thor choosing Jane over Asgard. But in her one mention in AOU, he doesn't even seem to know where she is and then returns to Asgard like nothing ever happened. I get the "real world" reasons why it happened, but that doesn't make the storytelling any better.
Would have to disagree. Even if I didn't watch AOS, I would still know Coulson was alive and still be questioning why The Avengers didn't know about it, especially from the man himself who seemed friends with at least a few of them.
If that was your point then you should've clarified earlier. You said the "universe" should have these nuanced tones, not just the film division.
Glad you liked it, I thought it was ridiculous.
WS handles this best of all: the humour is sparsely sprinkled throughout, is situational and/or character related, and never feels like it is obligatory to laugh at it. It also never takes away from the gravity, either of the scene or of the whole film.
I get the sense some movies say to us: "Hey guys! Enjoying the movie? Just in case you were getting too serious, here's one or two quips for ya!"
The worst offender of this apart from TDW is easily Doctor Strange. There are some great character and dialogue moments throughout the film, but we never get to appreciate and absorb them because, we're meant to be having fun!
Thank goodness Whedon's not doing it.
WS handles this best of all: the humour is sparsely sprinkled throughout, is situational and/or character related, and never feels like it is obligatory to laugh at it. It also never takes away from the gravity, either of the scene or of the whole film.
I get the sense some movies say to us: "Hey guys! Enjoying the movie? Just in case you were getting too serious, here's one or two quips for ya!" Ant-Man comes to mind: "Absolutely. My days of breaking into places and stealing **** are over." "I want you to break into a place and steal some ****." "Makes sense." Especially that last reply from Scott - we didn't need it and it's a clear forced attempt at lightening some serious dialogue which would otherwise help us connect more deeply with the characters.
The worst offender of this apart from TDW is easily Doctor Strange. There are some great character and dialogue moments throughout the film, but we never get to appreciate and absorb them because, we're meant to be having fun!
If the Russos and Co flow their CW template, which is very balanced, Infinity War should be just fine on that score. Thank goodness Whedon's not doing it.
Like what scenes? Strange has plenty of heavy scenes, including one where he has to deal with the fact that he just killed a man.WS handles this best of all: the humour is sparsely sprinkled throughout, is situational and/or character related, and never feels like it is obligatory to laugh at it. It also never takes away from the gravity, either of the scene or of the whole film.
I get the sense some movies say to us: "Hey guys! Enjoying the movie? Just in case you were getting too serious, here's one or two quips for ya!" Ant-Man comes to mind: "Absolutely. My days of breaking into places and stealing **** are over." "I want you to break into a place and steal some ****." "Makes sense." Especially that last reply from Scott - we didn't need it and it's a clear forced attempt at lightening some serious dialogue which would otherwise help us connect more deeply with the characters.
The worst offender of this apart from TDW is easily Doctor Strange. There are some great character and dialogue moments throughout the film, but we never get to appreciate and absorb them because, we're meant to be having fun!
If the Russos and Co flow their CW template, which is very balanced, Infinity War should be just fine on that score. Thank goodness Whedon's not doing it.
Like what scenes? Strange has plenty of heavy scenes, including one where he has to deal with the fact that he just killed a man.
I am curious how you react to Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Beloved films in a similar style which understand that levity is not a problem. Making people laugh does not take away from the importance of a situation.
With Dr. Strange, the two moments that stick out most for me is the sight gag with the cloak that completely wrecks the somber mood of the Ancient One's death. and then the showdown with Dormmamu which was played for laughs rather than the emotionally traumatizing moment it should have been. You can have a few jokes in a movie without it being a "funny movie". But Dr. Strange definitely crossed the line into being a "funny movie", and he's not supposed to be a funny character.
Yea, I think Ant-man was a great example how humour can work in MCU film very well and Dr Strange was quite the opposite.![]()
My only disagreement would be with Ant-Man. While there were certainly flaws in that film (Namely Hank Pym & Darren Cross INO) the humor wasn't really one of them. Scott is a funny hero, his comics are generally comedic, with touching family drama sprinkled in. So that sort of tone worked. The problem is when a movie about Dr. Strange is as funny as Ant-Man. Which, unfortuantely, is what we got...
Dr Strange is one of the examples where the film undermines the feeling of urgency and heaviness of the scenes to the point that one just doesn't care anymore. Like Strange is stabbed throught his heart just to run around a few seconds later. From now on anything can happen, I don't care, why should I?Like what scenes? Strange has plenty of heavy scenes
It's in the execution of those things, it's not just that the film contains those elements.I am curious how you react to Star Wars or Indiana Jones. Beloved films in a similar style which understand that levity is not a problem. Making people laugh does not take away from the importance of a situation.
With Dr. Strange, the two moments that stick out most for me is the sight gag with the cloak that completely wrecks the somber mood of the Ancient One's death. and then the showdown with Dormmamu which was played for laughs rather than the emotionally traumatizing moment it should have been. You can have a few jokes in a movie without it being a "funny movie". But Dr. Strange definitely crossed the line into being a "funny movie", and he's not supposed to be a funny character.
Idk, I found the cape moment to be cute, and meant to uplift both the viewer and Strange himself in a sad moment... Pixar does stuff like that all the time
And the Dormammu thing wasn't meant to be an "emotionally traumatizing moment", it was meant to show Strange's cleverness, as well as being very different from the standard CBM punch-em-up Third Act, which they most definitely accomplished.
The broom thing NotNick mentioned was just a brief little moment meant to evoke a chuckle after a bunch of tension, I think your hostility towards it is a bit much, but hey, opinions and a**holes and all that.
Seems some people just don't like light moments in their serious films