Saint
Avenger
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2003
- Messages
- 13,591
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 56
Here's something special for Whack; my way of easily proving that Jack Black and "zany comedy" do not equal Green Lantern:
=/=
Do you understand the concept of Green Lantern? Do you understand that nobody wants to see Green Lantern in Name Only? If the morons at Wb want to make a "zany comedy" with Jack Black, THEY CAN USE SOMETHING OTHER THAN GREEN LANTERN. When moron executives decide to attach the name of an established property to something entirely different, not only is it insulting to the fans, but it is ENEVITABLY BAD. Do I have to mention CINO? What we're talking about is a potential GLINO. Just because YOU think Green lantern is lame doesn't mean the rest of us deserve to see him ruined on screen.
The bottom line is this: Green lantern should not be a comedy about an overweight balding guy because GREEN LANTERN IS NOT A COMEDY ABOUT AN OVERWEIGHT BALDING GUY. It's that simple. That is NOT what Green Lantern is about.


Do you understand the concept of Green Lantern? Do you understand that nobody wants to see Green Lantern in Name Only? If the morons at Wb want to make a "zany comedy" with Jack Black, THEY CAN USE SOMETHING OTHER THAN GREEN LANTERN. When moron executives decide to attach the name of an established property to something entirely different, not only is it insulting to the fans, but it is ENEVITABLY BAD. Do I have to mention CINO? What we're talking about is a potential GLINO. Just because YOU think Green lantern is lame doesn't mean the rest of us deserve to see him ruined on screen.
The bottom line is this: Green lantern should not be a comedy about an overweight balding guy because GREEN LANTERN IS NOT A COMEDY ABOUT AN OVERWEIGHT BALDING GUY. It's that simple. That is NOT what Green Lantern is about.