Tacit Ronin
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,527
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 31
Agreed. They give a bad name to legit criticism.
To be honest, spectre is non existent now.. not much hype, buzz, no one is really going over drive with it, it's forgettable. Sadly.
Time to recast, different direction.
They tore into Skyfall as well. The only films they go easy on are Marvel films for some reason. Definite bias obviously.
That being said, I think they should stick to Craig to one more movie to complete his arc, with Madeline. The problem is that, narratively, you could be repeating itself, and not for the sake of formula. More like, being pigeoned holed, [BLACKOUT]because now he's with her, and most likely Blofeld will extract revenge. And then Bond probably will want revenge if she gets murdered. [/BLACKOUT]Then it's a repeat of QoS.
The next Bond movie will be hard to write. Either way, I hope it'll be another 'mission type movie' but it won't happen.
I think they basically need to stop making it personal for Bond. There's only so many times you can do that. They need to do something different. I'm not sure if making it simply a mission movie will solve things, 'cause then people will say the movie feels been there done that... we'll see.That being said, I think they should stick to Craig to one more movie to complete his arc, with Madeline. The problem is that, narratively, you could be repeating itself, and not for the sake of formula. More like, being pigeoned holed, [BLACKOUT]because now he's with her, and most likely Blofeld will extract revenge. And then Bond probably will want revenge if she gets murdered. [/BLACKOUT]Then it's a repeat of QoS.
The next Bond movie will be hard to write. Either way, I hope it'll be another 'mission type movie' but it won't happen.
I think they basically need to stop making it personal for Bond. There's only so many times you can do that. They need to do something different. I'm not sure if making it simply a mission movie will solve things, 'cause then people will say the movie feels been there done that... we'll see.
You know that Honest Trailers arent serious, right? They arent "tearing" into anything. Just having a laugh at the expense of a recent film. Since when did we start taking Honest Trailers and How it Should Have Ended so damn seriously? Cause I missed that memo. Are we taking RiffTrax serious now, too?
It's not about taking it too seriously, it's about being funny. They do have legitimate funny trailers when the movie is awful (ie After Earth). But when they just start nitpicking a good or mediocre movie, it ain't funny. Or coming up with excuses for why the SHIELD show isn't that bad, it ain't funny either.
It's not about taking it too seriously, it's about being funny. They do have legitimate funny trailers when the movie is awful (ie After Earth). But when they just start nitpicking a good or mediocre movie, it ain't funny. Or coming up with excuses for why the SHIELD show isn't that bad, it ain't funny either.
Come on, man. You can't get mad at Screen Junkies because they decide to joke a movie you like but love it when they joke movies you didn't. They are never outrageous or stretching. And like Marv said, it's not meant to be cruel.
Who's mad?
They've just been lazy recently. No harm in saying that.
I disagree it left the franchise in a mess. There are plenty of good ideas as to how Bond 25 can play out. They never explicitly state Bond retired - and if he did, it doesn't matter. He merely drives off with Madeleine. They can twist that plot any way they like. And the 00 section was not dismantled, but it was going to be replaced by Nine Eyes. Bond, Q and M averted that from happening.This movie left the franchise in a mess. Bond retired, 00 section dismantled, etc..wtf were they thinking…..?
This movie left the franchise in a mess. Bond retired, 00 section dismantled, etc..wtf were they thinking ..?