James Bond: 007 - Spectre - - Part 11

Status
Not open for further replies.
:funny:

I love how the media jump all over this, first chance they can get. He's doing another project in the interim so clearly he's "quitting". And then they get more interest by drumming up the hunt for the next Bond nonsense.
 
Bieber Bond song? :dry:

Where is this Radiohead Spectre song? Has it be released?

Love the lyrics, more suited to Spectre than Smith's song was IMO.


I'm lost, I'm a ghost
Dispossessed, taken host
My hunger burns a bullet hole
A spectre of my mortal soul
These rumours and suspicion
Anger is a poison
The only truth that I could see
Is when you put your lips to me
Futures tricked by the past
Spectre, how he laughs

Fear puts a spell on us
Always second-guessing love
My hunger burns a bullet hole
A spectre of my mortal soul
The only truth that I can see
Spectre has come for me
 
[YT]i6WO8Dcxr4s[/YT]

That's blocked in my country unfortunately, so I can't view it. :(

Love the lyrics, more suited to Spectre than Smith's song was IMO.


I'm lost, I'm a ghost
Dispossessed, taken host
My hunger burns a bullet hole
A spectre of my mortal soul
These rumours and suspicion
Anger is a poison
The only truth that I could see
Is when you put your lips to me
Futures tricked by the past
Spectre, how he laughs

Fear puts a spell on us
Always second-guessing love
My hunger burns a bullet hole
A spectre of my mortal soul
The only truth that I can see
Spectre has come for me

Those lyrics sound much better. Spectre is a good song title and the whole ghost theme is fitting, so I can't believe they didn't use that but used something as generic and bland as "Writing's on the wall" which doesn't even really fit the theme of the film at all.
 
I don't think M, Q or Moneypenny need to be replaced. Their chemistry together was one of the few things i liked in Spectre.
 
Craig will, at the very least do Bond 25 and finish the Blofeld arc out. Of that I am assured.


The real question is, does EON keep SPECTRE as an organisation around post-Blofeld and just continuously use them rather than having to keep creating new terrorists or MI6 agents gone bad? While I can see an immediate benefit to that, I wouldn't mind if they actually used some real world politics in the franchise. They tried and failed with Elliot Carver and post-Handover British/Chinese hostilities, but I'd to see someone actually do that right as opposed to the Roger Moore style of having all the villains be pseudo-Blofelds.
 
I think you could do a bit of both, with Spectre still around, but with other people running it, as a recurrying storyline. While you could go with one-shot adventures in between a la Goldfinger, some of those could resolve around real world politics.
 
Someone like Blofeld doesn't just get locked away without numerous backup plans in place to extract him. I'd imagine any follow-up would pursue that story.
 
I don't think M, Q or Moneypenny need to be replaced. Their chemistry together was one of the few things i liked in Spectre.

I hope they don't get replaced, even if Craig is done. George Lazenby and Roger Moore had the same supporting cast as Connery and it worked out well. I like all three in their roles currently.
 
I wish Moneypenny could go back to being Canadian instead of British.
 
If Craig comes back, we'll have Bond going rogue..yet, again. The more i watch Spectre the less i want Craig to come back. He just looked so tired in that movie. He really looked liked he really didn't want to be there.
 
Bond going rogue... this time it's personal! :o

But he already kind of went rogue in Spectre. And the lyrics of the song with "should I risk it all" seemed to suggest he was putting everything on the line, even though he's done that practically every time since the Brosnan era.

I'm not so keen on Craig either. I'd like a change. And Christoph Waltz said he'd only come back if Craig came back. But if Craig doesn't come back, then maybe we can get a better Blofeld.
 
If Craig comes back, we'll have Bond going rogue..yet, again. The more i watch Spectre the less i want Craig to come back. He just looked so tired in that movie. He really looked liked he really didn't want to be there.
I disagree. He was -- once again -- the best part of the film. The film asked him to play Bond more in like with how he traditionally is. And he gave a great Bondian performance.
 
I disagree. He was -- once again -- the best part of the film. The film asked him to play Bond more in like with how he traditionally is. And he gave a great Bondian performance.
Totally agree:up:. Just the nonchalance alone of him walking on the roof tops of Mexico City, loading his gun en route to his killing was such a great Bondian moment and there are many more like that in the film. Also he showed a great "Moore-esque" comedic timing in this one. I thought he was great (and not bored or tired at all like some people say)and one of the best things in the film. I hope he comes back at least for one more.
 
I think Craig is a great Bond... the script was just garbage after the first thirty minutes. There's only so much an actor can do.

There was a youtube video by Honest Trailers about, where they said the action scenes were like Goldeneye on "Agent". That is so hilariously true.
 
Yeah, the Honest Trailer was pretty spot on. I have faith that the next Bond film will be great. Craig's fifth and final, an odd numbered film in the new continuity, and the 25th of the franchise. It has to be good.
 
Bond going rogue... this time it's personal! :o

But he already kind of went rogue in Spectre. And the lyrics of the song with "should I risk it all" seemed to suggest he was putting everything on the line, even though he's done that practically every time since the Brosnan era.

I'm not so keen on Craig either. I'd like a change. And Christoph Waltz said he'd only come back if Craig came back. But if Craig doesn't come back, then maybe we can get a better Blofeld.

He's gone rogue in every film except Skyfall. It's getting monotonous.
 
He's gone rogue in every film except Skyfall. It's getting monotonous.

He went rogue in Skyfall when he and M took off to Scotland. Luckily Mallory ended up supporting the idea.

Brosnan went rogue in his last film too.
 
And it's been "this time it's personal" for every Bond film since Licence to Kill. That was in 1989. That's 26 years of this tired schtick. I prefer the first 26 or so years of Bond to the next 26.
 
If Craig comes back, we'll have Bond going rogue..yet, again. The more i watch Spectre the less i want Craig to come back. He just looked so tired in that movie. He really looked liked he really didn't want to be there.

Not at all. More and more it's looking like Bond 25 will be a proper adaptation of You Only Live Twice, and that novel isn't really anything like Licence to Kill or Quantum of Solace. Everything Bond does in that story is under the orders of M and the Japanese Secret Service. In fact the whole thing is given to Bond as a last chance to redeem himself as an agent after his grief nearly makes him useless.
 
I actually thought the first half wasn't bad. Agreed that the car chase with Mr Hinx was barely that. I didn't mind the step-brother angle or the reveal that all the villains in the Craig series were tied to Spectre, although I don't think it really made an impact. The ending was just kind of there, so it didn't leave me wanting more like Skyfall did.
 
He also aimed to kill his opponent in Spectre, before finding his conscience and leaving the final judgement to M, just like QOS.
 
I actually thought the first half wasn't bad. Agreed that the car chase with Mr Hinx was barely that. I didn't mind the step-brother angle or the reveal that all the villains in the Craig series were tied to Spectre, although I don't think it really made an impact. The ending was just kind of there, so it didn't leave me wanting more like Skyfall did.
I agree the London ending is rather boring. And Bond and Madeleine waiting around in that Tangier hotel room does drag. But nonetheless, I like the other parts of the film. I find it entertaining.
 
Totally agree:up:. Just the nonchalance alone of him walking on the roof tops of Mexico City, loading his gun en route to his killing was such a great Bondian moment and there are many more like that in the film. Also he showed a great "Moore-esque" comedic timing in this one. I thought he was great (and not bored or tired at all like some people say)and one of the best things in the film. I hope he comes back at least for one more.

Agreed. I think there's a difference in Craig seem 'bored' in the film and actually becoming comfortable in the role. This was a Bond who seemed to finally be enjoying what he was doing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,418
Messages
22,100,666
Members
45,896
Latest member
Bob999
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"