Tacit Ronin
Avenger
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,527
- Reaction score
- 8
- Points
- 31
So is Spider-man.I think Whedon did a really good job with the Avengers, but that was really a popcorn film.
So is Spider-man.I think Whedon did a really good job with the Avengers, but that was really a popcorn film.
There is a difference between a popcorn film and a campy film. Raimi's Spider-Man was campy, but it wasn't a popcorn movie.So is Spider-man.
The quality of writing is inconsequential; as a popcorn film is a very broad term that defines any film that is ultra popular with the casual moviegoer. This very broad criteria can house serious films, fun films, anything in between, as well as well written films, badly written films, and anything in between. Ergo, a well written movie doesn't automatically mean it's a popcorn film anymore than a badly written film would.A popcorn film is usually one that doesn't have great writing, and is just there to pass the time.
I can imagine Joss Whedon's Spider-Man.
It's called Buffy The Vampire Slayer.
This movie was great, but it was severely overhyped.

I actually disagree that Spider-man is a popcorn film. Way too much angst to be a popcorn film.
If that's your idea of popcorn, I'd hate to have to sit through your idea of a drama.
Not that angst is necessarily a bad thing. Hell, done right, it can be a good thing. Too much, and well, you have Spider-man 3.
Popcorn to me is a film with lots of action, relatively little plot, little depth, and little drama. Nothing that requires too much thinking. Transformers, Avengers, Battleship, etc. Some are obviously (a lot) better than others.
Umm... no. Over-react much?
Aren't you overhyping the movie by calling it great? Should everyone who enjoys the movie put footnotes at the end of their conversations/posts listing plotholes, inconsistencies, and gripes with the film?
Exactly.Popcorn to me is a film with lots of action, relatively little plot, little depth, and little drama. Nothing that requires too much thinking. Transformers, Avengers, Battleship, etc. Some are obviously (a lot) better than others.
Umm... no. Over-react much?
Lol.

From hindsight, this post makes me chuckle a little considering it's made over 600 million dollars so far.TASM is going to likely underperform

I actually disagree that Spider-man is a popcorn film. Way too much angst to be a popcorn film.
If that's your idea of popcorn, I'd hate to have to sit through your idea of a drama.
Not that angst is necessarily a bad thing. Hell, done right, it can be a good thing. Too much, and well, you have Spider-man 3.
Popcorn to me is a film with lots of action, relatively little plot, little depth, and little drama. Nothing that requires too much thinking. Transformers, Avengers, Battleship, etc. Some are obviously (a lot) better than others.
Oh, please God no.
Joss Wheadons' level of suckage is galactic in scope. Hawking, Einstein and Emmett Brown would be unable to calculate it even if they had Data to help them out.
I'd just as soon not have him anywhere near any Marvel character.