Kingdom of Heaven and The Two Towers

Mr.E.Nygma

Sidekick
Joined
Sep 11, 2005
Messages
2,006
Reaction score
1
Points
31
For those who sen both movies, do you think that the final battle scene in KOH and the Helm's Deep battle are VERY look a like as I do????
 
They look alike because all KOH did was regurgitate an inferior version of the material already seen in every ancient epic from the past decade or so, including LOTR.
 
Really, although I did find the Battle of Jerusalem to be more a Pellenor Fields rehash (and a very bad, boring one at that) than Helms Deep.
 
Well I think Helm's Deep was more suspensful, midn you it takes place over one night and the Siege of Jerusalem lasted ten days, I'd say it is not a rip off....

because....this may be hard to understand....but the siege of Jerusalem in 1187 ACTUALLY ****ING HAPPENED. There were siege towers (which were not at Hlem's Deep btw), catapults (also not at Helm's Deep), and last time I checked historically Saladdin won and took the city. Balian historically (who was actually a married middle aged lord of the Kingdom and no French blacksmith/engineer who had an affair with Sybilla) surrendered the kingdom in return of sparing the lives inside.

So the fact that you call it a rip off is quite sad and shows little knowledge on which it was based.
 
DACrowe said:
So the fact that you call it a rip off is quite sad and shows little knowledge on which it was based.
What I meant with ripp off is visually on screen what the battle scene is. Only the action not the conflict, story. Just moviewise, not in history and fiction comparison. I'm not a total dork.
 
Mr.E.Nygma said:
For those who sen both movies, do you think that the final battle scene in KOH and the Helm's Deep battle are VERY look a like as I do????

They do, but "Kingdom of Heaven" was being true to the time period. "The Two Towers" is a different story since it's based on a fantasy book. The battle in "The Two Towers" was more of a battle between good and evil. The Battle of Jerusalem was not.
 
Well if I was going to make a comparison I would make it for ROTK but since this movie was in the planning stages since mid-2003 I think it is consequential. Overall I think and find that KOH did its own thing as Scott didn't give a damn. It is much more realistic and less driven by awe inspiring moments of battle as ROTK is than by an anti-war sentiment of the waste of all this and futility. The end shot of fighting is supposed to resemble maggots jumping on a dead body and it does.

However to see this sequence and the whole movie done justice see the director's cut. The theatrical cut is mediocre, but the director's cut is a great film. Amazing how cutting 45 minutes of character development ruins your film in the end then.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
201,152
Messages
21,907,279
Members
45,704
Latest member
BMD
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"