TheVileOne
Eternal
- Joined
- Apr 3, 2002
- Messages
- 70,789
- Reaction score
- 15,039
- Points
- 103
I hope they don't make a third. The second one was awful.
I don't hate it, but it definitely felt like a failure to me. How they handled Roxy and Merlin are a good example of why for me. Then there was the ridiculous tracking device stuff. It felt like a film missing the charm of the first, but almost intentionally. Basically, the movie felt like the one thing they thought really worked in the first one was Harry and that didn't sit well with me.I still don’t get why people hated the second one so much
I don't hate it, but it definitely felt like a failure to me. How they handled Roxy and Merlin are a good example of why for me. Then there was the ridiculous tracking device stuff. Basically, the movie felt like the one thing they thought really worked in the first one was Harry and that didn't sit well with me.
According to THS, The Great Game will be set during World War I and will feature several fictionalized versions of real life figures who played a major part in shaping that historical period. Among these characters is Grigori Rasputin, the famed "Mad Monk" who used his almost mystical powers of manipulation to gain the ear of Russia's Czar Nicolas and his wife Alexandra. THS says Brad Pitt is at the top of the studio's list to play Rasputin, a man who was known for his insatiable sexual appetites as well as his hypnotic personality. The film is also seeking actors to play Archduke Ferdinand's assassin Gavrilo Princip as well as famed female spy, Mata Hari.
Kingsman Prequel Reportedly Eying Brad Pitt and Rachel Weisz
Sounds like Rachel will play sort of an Alfred to the protaganist’s batman. That would be a cool get. She was the best part of the mummy movies
I don't hate it, but it definitely felt like a failure to me. How they handled Roxy and Merlin are a good example of why for me. Then there was the ridiculous tracking device stuff. It felt like a film missing the charm of the first, but almost intentionally. Basically, the movie felt like the one thing they thought really worked in the first one was Harry and that didn't sit well with me.
I'm calling it now: they're gonna reveal in the next movie she survived and was just in hiding. We saw her dive out the window, FFS. Vaugn's pulling the same thing he did with Harry: if we don't see them die, they're not dead.Not interested in 3rd one. Killing Roxy in laziest way possible was such a dumb move.
I'm calling it now: they're gonna reveal in the next movie she survived and was just in hiding. We saw her dive out the window, FFS. Vaugn's pulling the same thing he did with Harry: if we don't see them die, they're not dead.
I don’t know how hot off the press this is, and I think I’m allowed to say it, but I’m not in the next Kingsman movie. That doesn’t mean I won’t be in Kingsman ever again. I was with [director Matthew Vaughn] as little as a few days ago, we’re still very much in business together, but his next journey in that world doesn’t involve me.
Hoping a prequel lets them scale back on the CGI. K2 was rough.They should make Kingsman 3: The Spy Stand first, before Kingsman Origins. They are doing the prequel route so early in the series. It's not like K2 did so well for them to focus in a prequel/spin off.
The tracking device scene is what kills the movie for me.