• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

BvS Lauren Cohan is Martha Wayne!

Wait what?

New 52 (not sure if pre-New 52 canon addressed it) gave them a common uncle on Bruce's mother's side and Kate's father's side (I think, I dropped that book when the writer change happened and it got bad). Seems like a stretch to say she could play her just because they're cousins but :shrug:

killed.jpg

Batman-21-02.png
 
Last edited:
Phillip Wayne has actually been around for a long time prior to the New 52.
 
‘Batman v Superman': Zack Snyder on That Martha Moment & Why He Killed The Waynes Again
Be aware there are spoilers for Batman v Superman.
HALEIGH FOUTCH said:
In an interview with Forbes, Snyder discussed his motivation behind the moment and why he considered it a payoff for the screentime devoted to the relationship between Clark and his mother.

Said Snyder,
You know, they’re both born and live in a world where someone can care about them and mourn them, and they can love their mother. And that’s the cool thing, you know we spend so much time with the Martha-Clark relationship that I think it kind of pays off there. You realize, oh, we needed that as viewers, so we could get to a moment with Batman where that moment with Martha resonates. Because we’ve lived on with Clark’s relationship with his mother, so that moment is like, “Wow, that’s ringing for me and I feel it.”

I’m not quite sold on this explanation, if only for the fact that Batman v Superman spends very little time on Clark and Martha’s relationship in the face of the broad-scale look at Superman’s presence in the world (and a massive amount of setup for future films). Perhaps he was referring to their moments together in Man of Steel, but given the fact that Batman v Superman wasn’t even in the works at that point, there’s pretty much no way he was already setting up that moment.

Likewise, that “Martha moment” also factored in his decision to feature the well-trod territory of Martha and Thomas Wayne’s murder. While fans have questioned the necessity of such a scene given how frequently Batman’s backstory has beene expounded on in previous adaptations. It’s like the death of Spider-Man’s Uncle Ben, we get it. It’s been done. But according to Snyder, witnessing the death of the Waynes was a fundamental set up for the payoff in Batman’s mid-battle change of heart.

When we were shooting the title sequence, that whole idea about, “Do we really need to see the death of the Waynes again,” is a big thing to take a shot at again. But you realize you need it, because it actually pays off. And I really wanted to do it all the way.

Ultimately, it’s easy to understand why suddenly being confronted with a direct reflection of his own personal tragedy would give Bruce pause, but it plays out too suddenly in the film and seemingly only because Snyder wanted it to play that way. Why wouldn’t Superman immediately try to reason with Batman by saying something like, “Lex Luthor is manipulating both of us and will kill my mother if we don’t work together” instead of an ambiguous “We need to work together.” The answer is because the story needed him to, and that’s never a satisfactory justification.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"