CaptainClown
Papa SPANK!!!
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2007
- Messages
- 25,611
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
not really the appropriate place for that sir.
When was Joker ever a harmless clown?
of course he was. he used to squirt paint at Bruce Wayne house
It's true.
You can't argue what a distinct Joker would be.
He doesn't exist, so no one will really ever know.
It's just all about personal opinion. Whatever people enjoy will be their own personal favourite Joker.
There is no distinct Joker.
(and yes, I did catch his smart ass remarks, jokes and what not...I just felt kind of strange the whole time I was reading it, I plan on reading it again though because I kind of sped through it because I wanted to see what happened so bad. This time Im going to take my time and enjoy it)
--dk7
well, actually i think this book was trying to show what Joker would be if he lived in "our" world. So was TDK, though that was less realistic than this one
I don't think that TDK's Joker was less realistic. But his focus was elsewhere. He didn't care about superficial things like mob territory, money or even power. He even despised the criminals, like the Chechen, who cared about this stuff. His goal was abstract - he wanted to immerse the people of Gotham into such horrible desperation that they would break and show how ugly is the soul of humanity.
While this Joker here was much more attached to the reality at hand and didn't seem fascinated by any abstract goals. To me he was like a crazy and extremely cruel mob boss (something he shared with Nicholson's Joker), but that doesn't necessarily make him more realistic.
of course he was. he used to squirt paint at Bruce Wayne house
of course he was. he used to squirt paint at Bruce Wayne house
I don't think that TDK's Joker was less realistic. But his focus was elsewhere. He didn't care about superficial things like mob territory, money or even power. He even despised the criminals, like the Chechen, who cared about this stuff. His goal was abstract - he wanted to immerse the people of Gotham into such horrible desperation that they would break and show how ugly is the soul of humanity.
While this Joker here was much more attached to the reality at hand and didn't seem fascinated by any abstract goals. To me he was like a crazy and extremely cruel mob boss (something he shared with Nicholson's Joker), but that doesn't necessarily make him more realistic.
But he wasn't simply a terrorist or a criminal. First and foremost he was a madman. This is more crucial trait for him than the terrorism or the crimes. Most terrorists and criminals are either sane, or at least not as crazy as the Joker, and that's why they pursue goals that are attached to the reality. The TDK Joker just didn't care about such patterns and rules that demand that the criminals should chase reasonable and sane goals. You can't label him as less realistic just because he had unique (albeit crazy) ideas.that's why i said he's less realistic. terrorists/criminals in our world don't pursue "abstracts." Even the worst ones don't cause chaos just for the sake of chaos