Fantasy Live Action ‘How to Train Your Dragon’ (Universal)

[Pennywise]

Dean DeBlois Gives Exciting Update on 'How to Train Your Dragon 2' Live-Action Remake (EXCLUSIVE)

Writer-director Dean DeBlois gives us an exclusive update on the anticipated live-action sequel remake of How to Train Your Dragon 2.

discussingfilm.net

 

[LoganPool]

Took the family on Tuesday. The first 30 minutes were a bit slow and boring, but once Hiccup and Toothless started bonding it picked up, and we all really enjoyed it. I know part 2 is in the works to release in 2 years, but after that I hope they wait at least 5 years to make part 3, to give Mason Thames and Nico Parker a chance to age up a little. I want the epilogue of part 3 to be those two actors appropriately aged.

 

[AVEITWITHJAMON]

View attachment 138786

Dean DeBlois Gives Exciting Update on 'How to Train Your Dragon 2' Live-Action Remake (EXCLUSIVE)

Writer-director Dean DeBlois gives us an exclusive update on the anticipated live-action sequel remake of How to Train Your Dragon 2.

discussingfilm.net

Had a feeling they would say something like this due to the criticisms of this movie. I get playing it safe for the first movie, hopefully they then keep their word on changing things up for the sequel.

 

[TheVileOne]

View attachment 138786

Dean DeBlois Gives Exciting Update on 'How to Train Your Dragon 2' Live-Action Remake (EXCLUSIVE)

Writer-director Dean DeBlois gives us an exclusive update on the anticipated live-action sequel remake of How to Train Your Dragon 2.

discussingfilm.net

I mean that's the reason the remake didn't suck.

 

[Lily Adler]

I mean that's the reason the remake didn't suck.

1:1 remakes seems to bode better critical scores

 

[TheVileOne]

1:1 remakes seems to bode better critical scores

More than just 1:1, the movie felt like it had actual heart and wonder to it. While I was watching it, I wasn't constantly trying to convince myself it wasn't mediocre like Lilo & Stitch.

 

[CB Fan]

But it was mediocre…for me it needed something that set it apart from the animated film along with better the leads.

 

[blueharvest]

 

[Another_Fool]

This was an absolute copy but like Lilo & Stitch, it had heart which is what counts. While I think the animated is better by default of it being the first, I can see the live action being the one I put on more at home.

I love Jay Baruchel but I often thought his voice sounded a little silly that it distracted me during the weightier moments of the trilogy. Mason Thames is more subdued and less funny, but I do think when the weighty scenes occur his performance is more impactful. I think I may like his Hiccup a weee bit better than the animated version.

 

[Mysteryman]

But it was mediocre…for me it needed something that set it apart from the animated film along with better the leads.

Why?
Why does the live action version need to add to its story?
It was a good enough story for the animated version.
Plus, the live action version wasn’t just for fans of the original. It was for a new generation of children and young adults who NEVER saw the original, HTTYD.

 

[Snow Queen]

Why?
Why does the live action version need to add to its story?
It was a good enough story for the animated version.
Plus, the live action version wasn’t just for fans of the original. It was for a new generation of children and young adults who NEVER saw the original, HTTYD.

I've got this amazing new invention for kids: it's called streaming. It theoretically makes it a lot easier to watch a movie that was made fifteen years ago. This is a theme park ad and an attempt to get in on that Disney remake money. The original movie has only made it to high school.

 

[Mysteryman]

I've got this amazing new invention for kids: it's called streaming. It theoretically makes it a lot easier to watch a movie that was made fifteen years ago. This is a theme park ad and an attempt to get in on that Disney remake money. The original movie has only made it to high school.

I've got this amazing new invention for kids: it's called streaming. It theoretically makes it a lot easier to watch a movie that was made fifteen years ago. This is a theme park ad and an attempt to get in on that Disney remake money. The original movie has only made it

The original trilogy is indeed available on streaming.
Additionally, there is a new live action adaptation available in theaters.
Why can’t kids enjoy, BOTH?

 

[Snow Queen]

The original trilogy is indeed available on streaming. Additionally there is a new live action adaptation available in theaters.
Why can’t kids enjoy, BOTH!

No one said they can't enjoy something that exists, just that it's lazy and arguing that it introduces new kids to a fifteen year old movie just sounds like an advertising campaign rather than a meaningful creative effort.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

The original trilogy is indeed available on streaming.
Additionally, there is a new live action adaptation available in theaters.
Why can’t kids enjoy, BOTH?

That's a completely different argument.

 

[sueb1863]

Yeah, I think it's pretty obvious that if Universal didn't have a new theme park to advertise, this movie would not exist.