Superman Returns Lois' sleeping with Supes

Drago

Civilian
Joined
May 31, 2006
Messages
542
Reaction score
0
Points
11
I know I've noticed a lot of people complaining that at the end of Superman 2 there's that "mind wipe" thing and that Lois doesn't know she slept with Superman and now is in the situation of having his kid, and so on and so forth.

The way I've looked at the mind-wipe thing (helps with continuity) is just that Superman made her forget his identity, so that she remembers everything from Superman 2 except that Clark is Superman, so that she does remember sleeping with Superman.

Just wondering if other people have looked at it the same way, since a lot of people brought it up as a big issue.
 
personally.....I don't think SR includes the FOS love scene and the whole amnesia kiss in its continuity.........

in fact, I don't think SR really draws much from Superman 2........it draw mores from Superman 1.

For example, in the official movie novel, Superman has yet to meet Zod and co. He's only heard about them from Jor-El.

I think in SR's history, Supes slept with Lois as Superman.....and perhaps on the night Lois references in her article "I Spent the Night with Superman" ( perhaps that is the night he took her flying in Superman 1 )
 
super-bats said:
I think in SR's history, Supes slept with Lois as Superman.....and perhaps on the night Lois references in her article "I Spent the Night with Superman" ( perhaps that is the night he took her flying in Superman 1 )

I agree.
 
super-bats said:
personally.....I don't think SR includes the FOS love scene and the whole amnesia kiss in its continuity.........

in fact, I don't think SR really draws much from Superman 2........it draw mores from Superman 1.

For example, in the official movie novel, Superman has yet to meet Zod and co. He's only heard about them from Jor-El.

I think in SR's history, Supes slept with Lois as Superman.....and perhaps on the night Lois references in her article "I Spent the Night with Superman" ( perhaps that is the night he took her flying in Superman 1 )
So Lois is a super easy super **** now because she slept with a man she just met.
 
super-bats said:
personally.....I don't think SR includes the FOS love scene and the whole amnesia kiss in its continuity.........

in fact, I don't think SR really draws much from Superman 2........it draw mores from Superman 1.

For example, in the official movie novel, Superman has yet to meet Zod and co. He's only heard about them from Jor-El.

I think in SR's history, Supes slept with Lois as Superman.....and perhaps on the night Lois references in her article "I Spent the Night with Superman" ( perhaps that is the night he took her flying in Superman 1 )

I agree :up:
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
So Lois is a super easy super **** now because she slept with a man she just met.

No. Lois gave in to sleeping with f***ing Superman.
 
Master Bruce said:
No. Lois gave in to sleeping with f***ing Superman.
And really, haven't we all done that at least once?
 
My memories of Supe II may be bit sketchy, but didn't Superman turn himself to human just so he can sleep with Lois? If that's the case Lois didn't technically sleep with Superman but rather Clark Kent. Just a thought.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
Apparently I have far different morals than you.

We're not talking about your morals or my morals. We're talking about Lois Lane's... After she met freakin' Superman, whom I highly doubt she would have counted on meeting when she set her own moral standards for herself. It's not everyday that she'd meet someone who can fly, change the course of the Earth, or bounce bullets off of his skin.
 
Master Bruce said:
We're not talking about your morals or my morals. We're talking about Lois Lane's... After she met freakin' Superman, whom I highly doubt she would have counted on meeting when she set her own moral standards for herself.
Shes a ****.
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
Because according to one poster she sleep with a man she just met, thats a uber **** in my book.
That's bit harsh.

First of all....there is no evidence that that happened (it is just conjecture on one poster's part, thus a hypothetical scenerio)...so it isn't part of known character history.

Secondly...if a person had a habit of sleeping with many men, minutes after meeting them, then a label like that could possible be given to them (again depending upon the person's personal moral views)...but a one time event by a human overcome by the presence of a truely "Godlike" person can be construed as behavior outside the norm and not looked so harshly upon.

Thirdly...for the sake of your future happiness...don't inquire into any of the past realtionships of any women you encounter (I'm not kidding).
 
C. Lee said:
That's bit harsh.

First of all....there is no evidence that that happened (it is just conjecture on one poster's part, thus a hypothetical scenerio)...so it isn't part of known character history.

Secondly...if a person had a habit of sleeping with many men, minutes after meeting them, then a label like that could possible be given to them (again depending upon the person's personal moral views)...but a one time event by a human overcome by the presence of a truely "Godlike" person can be construed as behavior outside the norm and not looked so harshly upon.

Thirdly...for the sake of your future happiness...don't inquire into any of the past realtionships of any women you encounter (I'm not kidding).

hehehehehe

Amen C.Lee.....I know this one all too well.
 
Pickle-El said:
hehehehehe

Amen C.Lee.....I know this one all too well.
It's interesting how many young men believe that the more the number of thier conquests, the better they are....but if a woman has even seen a naked man she is a ****. The double standard on sexual issues is simply ridiculus....and these are supposed to be the "more enlightened" times than of this "old Man's" days.
 
What's it matter? Bryan already said he ignored that part :rolleyes:
 
Immortalfire said:
What's it matter? Bryan already said he ignored that part :rolleyes:
The problem is....if it isn't told in SR which parts of the previous movies are now fact and which parts are not....then naturally you are going to have a bunch of confused viewers.
 
C. Lee said:
It's interesting how many young men believe that the more the number of thier conquests, the better they are....but if a woman has even seen a naked man she is a ****. The double standard on sexual issues is simply ridiculus....and these are supposed to be the "more enlightened" times than of this "old Man's" days.


That's America for you.
 
Pickle-El said:
That's America for you.
The problem is...it's not just Americans...it's just that we say we are more "enlightened" about these things when we really aren't.
 
I always learn something about life when you post.
 
Wesyeed said:
I always learn something about life when you post.
Funny....that's what the Dali Lama says too.
 
Uh I'm a chick by the way and Superman is a **** too. (according to one posters view)
 
I SEE SPIDEY said:
Uh I'm a chick by the way and Superman is a **** too. (according to one posters view)



Me too, i'm a **** as well

i admit it.

;)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"