Legendver2
Superhero
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2014
- Messages
- 7,075
- Reaction score
- 2,561
- Points
- 103
What's wrong with the poster?
What's wrong with the poster?
What's wrong with the poster?
Maybe it's for being a reminder that the movie exists.Yeah, I think it's a good poster.
Someone get this hothead out of here.He was in The Dark Knight Rises.
Someone get this hothead out of here.
I got no quote from senator forgettable.Wrong guy. That was Matthew Modine.
Funny, I saw no one refuting it that day. I saw a cryptic Instagram video, a vague WB non-statement ("no plans, no decisions!") and diplomatic statement from his agent that gave us no actual information. If they'd actually wanted to refute it, it would have been easy as saying "that's not true" or "he will still play Superman in upcoming films." But no one did that. Wonder why.I love all of "Who Should Replace Cavill As Superman In the Wake of His Departure From The DCEU" articles I'm seeing all over the web now. It has now become a foregone conclusion that Henry left despite the fact Henry's own agent, WB and Henry himself refuted it that same day.
Sheesh. Well, I hope this stunt was worth it.
Funny, I saw no one refuting it that day. I saw a cryptic Instagram video, a vague WB non-statement ("no plans, no decisions!") and diplomatic statement from his agent that gave us no actual information. If they'd actually wanted to refute it, it would have been easy as saying "that's not true" or "he will still play Superman in upcoming films." But no one did that. Wonder why.
The trades are telling y'all what's up. WB did not renew Henry's contract and have no current plans for Superman in film. This doesn't technically close the door on his involvement in future projects (which means Garcia and WB can BS about this all day long), but it means whoever DOES kickstart a Superman project, whether its in the next year or 5, will have no obligation to involve Henry at all. If someone decides to include Superman in Supergirl or another subsequent film after all, they will be free to recast. That's the writing on the wall from where I'm standing.
I got no quote from senator forgettable.
Better than nothing.I remember, "call me?". That was about it![]()
![]()
Thor take me to space or Aquaman take me underwater, anywhere but here
Funny, I saw no one refuting it that day. I saw a cryptic Instagram video, a vague WB non-statement ("no plans, no decisions!") and diplomatic statement from his agent that gave us no actual information. If they'd actually wanted to refute it, it would have been easy as saying "that's not true" or "he will still play Superman in upcoming films." But no one did that. Wonder why.
The trades are telling y'all what's up. WB did not renew Henry's contract and have no current plans for Superman in film. This doesn't technically close the door on his involvement in future projects (which means Garcia and WB can BS about this all day long), but it means whoever DOES kickstart a Superman project, whether its in the next year or 5, will have no obligation to involve Henry at all. If someone decides to include Superman in Supergirl or another subsequent film after all, they will be free to recast. That's the writing on the wall from where I'm standing.
Because Hollywood severely lacks new ideas so they want to keep trying to cash in on the popularity of old franchises.They’re making a Charlie’s Angel movie? Why?