Da-Scribe
Avenger
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 12,848
- Reaction score
- 10,487
- Points
- 103
That was a crock...but how quickly people forget that Momoa didn't care all that much.
Did you not see him flip out about it on ig?
That was a crock...but how quickly people forget that Momoa didn't care all that much.
That was a crock...but how quickly people forget that Momoa didn't care all that much.
What? Momoa literally publicly dismissed that fake announcement.
Did you not see him flip out about it on ig?
And then filmed AQ2...
Think back people thought he would sit out and back Ray. He didn't. Gal ripped the dick that is Whedon and others ripped him too but notice no real nuking of Hamada or Johns...
Look I'm just a shlubby dude...Im gonna back off cause I feel this is making things worse.
Just ignore me...
Tis' also easy to place most of the hate on bald Whedon. But folks above him let him get away with it. Who was at the top? You can't circle them answers without including Johns. Kinda how bald Whedon would threaten Gal's career, but not Affleck etc. Cyborgs arch was pretty much erased, if that aint a big F U to him, I don't know what is, even if they hide behind the whole 2 hr mandate nonsense.
There was a point where lots of people doubted Fishers allegations against Whedon, "where's the evidence?" they said. Then others who worked with Whedon spoke out about his past behaviour. Charisma Carpenter publicly supported Fisher and talked about Whedons behaviour and the stars of Buffy came forward to back her up.
A pattern of behaviour confirmed by multiple corroborating witnesses, a chain reaction started by Fisher revealing what people in power in the companies are able to get away with. Things that were kept secret for years because others were choosing to enable and support Whedon.
I don't see many people doubting the allegations against Whedon anymore.
So why the doubt when it comes to Johns? If we accept what Fisher said about Whedon is the truth, then we have to consider who let him get away with it, who enabled him? Johns was there, others have spoken out about his own behaviour, and Fisher seems to have been proven right about Whedon.
And if not Johns, why would Fisher give whomever was actually enabling Whedon a free pass and target an innocent instead?
It has been interesting seeing the conversation change from "Fisher is a liar" to "Yes maybe Fisher was telling the truth about Whedon, but everything else he says is a lie."
Yup, guy is a moron for opening his mouth and breathing new life into the controversy, especially after things have mostly died down.