LoganGambit87
Sidekick
- Joined
 - Jun 4, 2014
 
- Messages
 - 2,615
 
- Reaction score
 - 282
 
- Points
 - 73
 

Killmonger definitely had some great lines and presence but if you think about it, he didnt really have a lot to do. He had the museum scene. Then disappears for half the movie until he shows up in Wakanda. Then takes over, has a meaty scene with his dad, then its the finale. I would have liked one scene showing him actually convincing more Wakandans why they should follow him.
He showed a lot of charisma in his first scene and wish it had carried through to the Wakanda scenes.
Considering his actions change the entire countries way of life, I'd say he did plenty.This is why I have a hard time agreeing with people saying he's such a great villain. He doesn't really do all that much, and this is not a Hannibal Lecter type situation where he's SO mesmerizing that it doesn't matter.
Considering his actions change the entire countries way of life, I'd say he did plenty.


There could be an intriguing short film based on Killmonger's black ops career.
There could be some good comics going way deeper into his history that you can't get into on film.
There could be an intriguing short film based on Killmonger's black ops career.
There could be some good comics going way deeper into his history that you can't get into on film.
Jordan has a lot to thank Coogler for. His role as Killmonger has effectively erased his Fantastic Four tragedy
That hairstyle was LEGENDARY
Wow there's been alot of Killmonger is a misogynist articles in the past week. Are people missing the point of the character. He's the villain, he's not supposed to be a good person despite how sympathetic he is.
Here's a few...
https://www.themarysue.com/how-killmongers-misogyny-teaches-us-about-western-patriarchy/
https://bossip.com/1622576/editorial-you-love-kilmonger-at-the-expense-of-black-women/
I mean, they aren't wrong that Killmonger has a whole lot of misogynist undertones. I just think that, yes, this was deliberate, and not meant as a good thing. Erik Killmonger is supposed to be a villain where the audience ( particularly black and liberal audience-members ) find themselves cheering for him at times. . . and then stop and go "Wait. I'm cheering for a guy who casually kills women who get in his way, and advocates a bloody reign with a literal British Empire quote". One of the many complex messages in the movie is 'the dangerous allure of radical vengeance'. I suspect that the misogynist undercurrents in black culture were, if not a significant theme, at least something present in Coogler's mind.
Anyway, as another issue. . . am I the only one who reached the Killmonger vision sequence, and had the following really bleak and horrifying thought? "He's going to go into his vision. . . and there's going to be no one there." Either because his ancestors utterly rejected him, or worse, his ancestors are gone, not allowed in the Wakandan spirit realm. I kind of wonder if Coogler considered such an angle, and went otherwise because it would have been too bleak.
I mean, they aren't wrong that Killmonger has a whole lot of misogynist undertones. I just think that, yes, this was deliberate, and not meant as a good thing. Erik Killmonger is supposed to be a villain where the audience ( particularly black and liberal audience-members ) find themselves cheering for him at times. . . and then stop and go "Wait. I'm cheering for a guy who casually kills women who get in his way, and advocates a bloody reign with a literal British Empire quote". One of the many complex messages in the movie is 'the dangerous allure of radical vengeance'. I suspect that the misogynist undercurrents in black culture were, if not a significant theme, at least something present in Coogler's mind.
.