BvS MOS 2 and Justice League being filmed simultaneously?

Status
Not open for further replies.
the thing was that no one knows in the movie why the oil rig explode. Some thought maybe due to the "large" scale of pollution that the rig causes may be a cause to being "accidentally" exploded. That was my point but just a rumor. Nothing more and some just take that out of propotion and not being just skepticall about it. Seriously how irascible are people today after the delayed announcement.
 
Why do some ships sink? And what rumor was there in the movie?

How old are you, bro?

Do you need a GPS bro? the rumor was out of the movie. It was when the movie was released. just that, a rumor. the one that in some way atlanteans had to do with the oil rig explosion. nothing more than just a rumor.
 
Last edited:
If you look carefully, you'll notice that we were laughing. :O
well some "laughs" were empty.

And at the time, did it occur to you that oil rig fires at sea happen in real life...for real reasons? Did it to those who started the 'rumor'?
I know that occurs in real life, but that doens't mean that it wouldn't be caused by some people also, right? but I don't know. I just read it. I like the idea of Aquaman being in the next movies, maybe the feelings won.
 
Last edited:
atn2hw.gif

:wall:
 
I have to put my foot down for Peter Jackson. I like the guy and his work, but his recent films tend to be too long and protracted. Not just The Hobbit films, but also The Lovely Bones (big misfire) and King Kong (too damn long!).


I feel just the opposite his films have time to breath and properly develop. As a rabid fan of the original King Kong, I was not disappointed at all.
 
I feel just the opposite his films have time to breath and properly develop. As a rabid fan of the original King Kong, I was not disappointed at all.
ya, peter jackson, the man who delivers. the deliverman.
 
Lois said something about two men pulling out their ****s........so Hawk and Dove are a guarantee.

In the smallville fight the army use Apache helicopters.


APACHE CHIEF CONFIRMED!




Also Lois talks to a character called "WOODBURN", what makes"Wood" "Burn"?

FIRE!

FIRESTORM IS CONFIRMED!

A tornado is responsible for Jonathan Kent's death. Surely there was some blood involved, which we know is red.

RED TORNADO IS A LOCK. :up:
 
or could be like at my first showing of Thor 2 and the audience stayed to watch the after credits scene and no one knew who the Collector was or why that scene was significant.
 
Well, they showed a large city in mos, and we all know who hates large cities. Godzilla.
so he must be the villain.
 
So, everything comes from Krypton now?
 
It all makes sence now. The Dc Cinematic Universe is so realistic!
 
Do you imagine Green Arrow in the new DC movie universe? Today were some "speculations" about him.
 
Last edited:
Discussions could mean he asked his dog about it for all we know.
 
I'm calling BS.

WB isn't ignoring the opportunity they have there. They're essentially saving money by NOT having to make origin movies of The Flash and Green Arrow. It's all laid out for them. By having these two shows AND Batman vs. Superman, they're guaranteed to have:

Superman
Batman
Wonder Woman
The Flash
Green Arrow

I mean, whether you ignore 2011's Green Lantern or not, all they REALLY have to do is re-establish Green Lantern and they're all set. IT'S ALL THERE.

Personally, I didn't think Green Lantern was a masterpiece (far from it), but I accept Ryan Reynolds as Hal. That movie exists. Let it exist. His origin is there, he's established. Don't redo what you already did. You're already doing that with Batman.

BOOM - you've got your Justice League. And it was effortless.

Any other characters like Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, or Cyborg, it's not an emergency if we don't establish them right away. Put them in the movie, but it's not imperative to give them colossal amounts of screentime.
 
Last edited:
^ I don't think they should keep Reynolds as Hal or use that movie in any way related to JL. Too many bad connotations now. MOS started a new continuity.
 
I'm calling BS.

WB isn't ignoring the opportunity they have there. They're essentially saving money by NOT having to make origin movies of The Flash and Green Arrow. It's all laid out for them. By having these two shows AND Batman vs. Superman, they're guaranteed to have:

Superman
Batman
Wonder Woman
The Flash
Green Arrow

I mean, whether you ignore 2011's Green Lantern or not, all they REALLY have to do is re-establish Green Lantern and they're all set. IT'S ALL THERE.

Personally, I didn't think Green Lantern was a masterpiece (far from it), but I accept Ryan Reynolds as Hal. That movie exists. Let it exist. His origin is there, he's established. Don't redo what you already did. You're already doing that with Batman.

BOOM - you've got your Justice League. And it was effortless.

Any other characters like Aquaman, Martian Manhunter, or Cyborg, it's not an emergency if we don't establish them right away. Put them in the movie, but it's not imperative to give them colossal amounts of screentime.

I don't want the CW DC characters anywhere near this film personally. They're fine on their own.
 
^ I don't think they should keep Reynolds as Hal or use that movie in any way related to JL. Too many bad connotations now. MOS started a new continuity.

Agree.

Green Lantern is toxic. If I were WB I'd Star Wars Holiday Special that film and destroy all copies they could get their hands on. it was that bad.
 
It was that bad. GL is best ignored. Having it as part of this universe in any way would just make the GL character harder to sell.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,663
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"