• Xenforo is upgrading us to version 2.3.7 on Tuesday Aug 19, 2025 at 01:00 AM BST (date has been pushed). This upgrade includes several security fixes among other improvements. Expect a temporary downtime during this process. More info here

No Confirmation Yet, Is TIH2 Going to Happen?

I mean from another standpoint, I understand since you have this big CG creation and it might seem silly if he they didn't execute some of those ideas just right.

I simply missed the movies having more Hulk and seeing more of the Hulk and the Hulk having an actual personality.

I know what you mean.I was just ellaborationg a little futher from my point of veiw.
For instance,I say this all the time.If he would have talked it would have also took you away from any imperfections in the CGI or at least most of them.
Think about a puppet and a ventriliquest.As long as he is silent he just looks like a puppet but when he starts to speak he begins to take life even though you know he is a dummy.
Now a real good ventriliquest can completly take the focus of off him and have you hanging on every word the dummy is saying.It is an element that would have advanced it greatly.Just look at Chuckie,now imagine if he would not have spoken.
 
I hope they don't make another movie. They have done enough damage to this superhero already.
 
I do agree with you, Hmarrs, in principal. The next movie should be focused on the Hulk's relationship with Banner and on the Hulk himself. The only thing I dislike is that everybody massacres the Hulk's dialogue of the 1970's. It isn't "Hulk smash, Hulk not like". It actually was "Leave Hulk alone or Hulk will smash you, puny humans, for bothering him". Although his dialogue was simplistic and in the third-person but he was not Tarzan in any stretch of imagination. He used proper grammar and he was more of a conservationist than the two films suggested. Yes. he is a man of few words but - Jeez!

Savage Jay
 
he's more like the 80's cartoon hulk really, but with more depth, and less talk.
 
I do agree with you, Hmarrs, in principal. The next movie should be focused on the Hulk's relationship with Banner and on the Hulk himself. The only thing I dislike is that everybody massacres the Hulk's dialogue of the 1970's. It isn't "Hulk smash, Hulk not like". It actually was "Leave Hulk alone or Hulk will smash you, puny humans, for bothering him". Although his dialogue was simplistic and in the third-person but he was not Tarzan in any stretch of imagination. He used proper grammar and he was more of a conservationist than the two films suggested. Yes. he is a man of few words but - Jeez!

Savage Jay
Your right.
 
THIS WHAT GALE ANNE HURD has to say about hulk she owns the rights to hulk

Those who've seen "The Incredible Hulk" know that a not-too-subtle sequel hint was dropped when Tim Blake Nelson's Samuel Sterns had a sample of Banner's blood drip into an open wound on his head, causing him to mutate. Hurd said that a proper "Hulk 2" would pick up on this event.

"The Leader," she said when asked what Nelson was transforming into when last we saw him. "It would be a blast [to put the Leader in the sequel], and Tim Blake Nelson is tremendous and a very talented filmmaker in his own right."
 
THIS WHAT GALE ANNE HURD has to say about hulk she owns the rights to hulk

Those who've seen "The Incredible Hulk" know that a not-too-subtle sequel hint was dropped when Tim Blake Nelson's Samuel Sterns had a sample of Banner's blood drip into an open wound on his head, causing him to mutate. Hurd said that a proper "Hulk 2" would pick up on this event.

"The Leader," she said when asked what Nelson was transforming into when last we saw him. "It would be a blast [to put the Leader in the sequel], and Tim Blake Nelson is tremendous and a very talented filmmaker in his own right."

Thanks for posting this, but it is kinda old news. This scenario is the natural flow of events stemming from the end of TIH. I hope this desire to put the Leader on screen translates to reality sometime soon.:yay:
 
Yeah TIH was great IMO to me it was even better than ironman, and I liked ironman, it desersves a sequel.
 
Iron Man got the big marketing push, that's why it did better.
 
Iron Man got the big marketing push, that's why it did better.

TIH did not do as well as Iron Man because people that watched Ang Lee's Hulk had low expectations for it, they released it at a month loaded with anticipated summer movies and poor marketing.
 
Last time I've heard anything about the Hulk, I heard that they would do a sequel after The Avengers, meaning Hulk might be a villain in the Avengers.
 
TIH did not do as well as Iron Man because people that watched Ang Lee's Hulk had low expectations for it, they released it at a month loaded with anticipated summer movies and poor marketing.
Exactly. Iron Man was fresh and there was no predecessor to put doubt in potential moviegoers' minds like there was with TIH.
Marvel marketed TIH in a "oh, BTW" type fashion.
 
I want TIH2 so much. Alot of my friends didn't see it at the cinema because they thought it would be just like Ang's Hulk, which they hated. I've since watched the dvd with them and all of them love it, they also think it's better than Iron Man, which I believe is a good one time watch movie whereas TIH has great rewatchability.
 
The Incredible Hulk was one of very few films that made me feel as if I were 10 years old again; I mean I went and saw TDK and enjoyed it immensely but it didn't stir that kiddie-like feeling that TIH did. It's sort of hard to explain.

I found myself acting more juvenile than my son, who is that age, during that final boss battle. Even now that the movie's on pay tv, I still feel the same way when I watch it...
 
I think that is more of the problem than the solution the fact that these movies are being geared to the 12-13 year olds. Marvel needs to target a more mature audience. I think Iron Man had the right balance up until the final act. TIH was basically a rock em, sock em, Hulk smash film. Had they included more of the Doc Sampson scenes/psychological aspect of the film I think it would have been received as well as Iron Man. It was too dumbed down for my taste.
 
Last edited:
because people that watched Ang Lee's Hulk had low expectations for it
They saw the trailers. Not one single actor from Ang Lee's Hulk was in them and the Hulk looked totally different. People should've been able to figure out this was a reboot.
 
TIH was basically a rock em, sock em, Hulk smash film.
But sometimes there's nothing wrong with that when one goes to see a picture. The movie Commando provides that same sort of escapism even though TIH has a better story...

I will agree with you that perhaps some of the subtleties that weren't included in the initial film might've fleshed out TIH more for a broader appeal but at least for me, I got my money's worth.
 
Last edited:
You can't deny the marketing was better for Iron Man than Hulk.
 
TIH did not do as well as Iron Man because people that watched Ang Lee's Hulk had low expectations for it, they released it at a month loaded with anticipated summer movies and poor marketing.

I'm sure it didn't have anything to do with it being a mediocre film. :o
 
Iron Man got the big marketing push, that's why it did better.

Exactly. Iron Man was fresh and there was no predecessor to put doubt in potential moviegoers' minds like there was with TIH.
Marvel marketed TIH in a "oh, BTW" type fashion.

A mixture of both

On another note: I also really enjoyed TIH. IM was a better film imo because the acting was better but TIH's action blew IM action scenes out of the water.
They shouldve released TIH this year where after TF2 there are no big big summer movies. July would have been perfect.
 
I agree, if TIH came out the same weekend this year, it would've held the #1 spot until Transformers 2. Come on, a romantic comedy in the middle of the summer was #1 at the boxoffice?
 
^^^It's a really weak summer for movies compared to 2008.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"