I gotta agree here.
Gotta disagree there, considering the comics have grounded Batman over the years anyway.![]()
Grounded in realism, is different than confined to it. We'll find out in TDK.
Just responding to your agreement that Batman was "utter fantasy". Which...is technically true. Since he's not real. But that's not what he was talking about. I assume.So why ground him even more?

So why ground him even more?
Let's hope so.
Well you know there are some deleted scenes that...
t:
It makes me sad that a lot of people here want to see a fantasy comic batman movie than just a good semi-serious movie. Why cant a comic book movie be a good movie with a sense of realism to it?[/QUOTE]
Batman Begins
Again, I hope the realism in TDK, will be heighten. Movies that come to mind are the Indy movies, T1 & T2, Aliens. Movies that are on steroids.
Thats whats this movie should be.
So when Batman does some incredible acrobatic move, instead of the audience saying, "Right, that unrealistic." Our minds should, knowing the training he had in BB, just automatically accept it.
It makes me sad that a lot of people here want to see a fantasy comic batman movie than just a good semi-serious movie. Why cant a comic book movie be a good movie with a sense of realism to it?
I prefer a semi-serious, fantasy comic Batman movie with a sense of realism, like the examples Raybia gives.
In fact, the most realistic fantasy movie I've ever seen was Pan's Labyrinth.
I prefer a semi-serious, fantasy comic Batman movie with a sense of realism, like the examples Raybia gives.
That's a really good example. I liked that movie.
I only wish Nolan would improve the way he shoots the fight scenes.
Just reading the reviews for Pan's, makes me feel like why cant we here at SHH want good serious reviews like Pan's? Why must we always want fanasty Batman. And yes I know Pan's in super fanasty and not realistic per say but it was taking seriously by critics and film awards and its probably going to get some serious awards. These next Bat films have the potential to be taken as serious film making be it comic book or not.
There was nothing particularly inspired about the adaptation of V FOR VENDETTA. It turned a rather brilliant piece of dystopian fiction into a heavy-handed popcorn film.Nolan's movie lack iconic imagery and atmosphere. Imagination does not equal nipples on the Batman costume. It equals memorable action scene choreography(The Bourne Identity), ambitious cinematography(Children of Men), classic screenplay and dialogue(Robocop, Fight Club), epic storytelling(Mask of the Phantasm) and inspired adaptation of the source material(V for Vendetta, MOTP).
It makes me sad that a lot of people here want to see a fantasy comic batman movie than just a good semi-serious movie. Why cant a comic book movie be a good movie with a sense of realism to it?[/QUOTE]
Batman Begins
Again, I hope the realism in TDK, will be heighten. Movies that come to mind are the Indy movies, T1 & T2, Aliens. Movies that are on steroids.
Thats whats this movie should be.
So when Batman does some incredible acrobatic move, instead of the audience saying, "Right, that unrealistic." Our minds should, knowing the training he had in BB, just automatically accept it.
I think people over-exgerate the 'realism' in Batman Begins. LIke what you said, Indy and Terminator give a surrealistic tone that draws you in.
And honestly, it was a Catch 22 with Nolan: If he went Gothic, you'll hear people going "OMG, he's copying Burton..why not bring back Burton." He goes semi-realistic with heighten sense of fantasy, people go "OMG, it's too realistic. It takes away from the fantasy."
And I honestly think that Batman Begins' semi-realism is not like the X-Men movies, where it goes into realism rather deeply. Too deeply sometimes (still, i liked X2 though..)
No matter what, people will complain. That's how it is. But for a cheap shot, most likely, it's the middle-aged people still living with their parents (or alone) who are complaing.