T'Jai
eclectic threadkiller
- Joined
- Apr 24, 2006
- Messages
- 1,558
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
That's my favorite movie of 2007 simply cause it pulled no punches...The Mist had a downer ending and that was okay. I thought it worked for the movie.![]()
That's my favorite movie of 2007 simply cause it pulled no punches...The Mist had a downer ending and that was okay. I thought it worked for the movie.![]()
I don't like this rule that says that Hollywood blockbusters have to all have happy endings.That's my favorite movie of 2007 simply cause it pulled no punches...
psssst...(I think that's why they have that rule)I don't like this rule that says that Hollywood blockbusters have to all have happy endings.I mean real life doesn't always work out that way.
The Mist had a downer ending and that was okay. I thought it worked for the movie.![]()
most people don't like it because it wasn't that much similar to the book, just check out, i read the book and also seen the movie, and i still liked the movie![]()
^ Then they should've adapted another story, or made an original one. You don't make "I Am Legend" without that ending, just as you don't make a movie about the Holocaust ending with all the Jews surviving and being just peachy.
I'm sure it's an entertaining, well acted flick, but without the ending it's not "I Am Legend".
A lot of others that didn't like it, like a number of my mouth breathing co-workers, was because it was too slow. They wanted another mindless action film were **** is blowing up ever other minute. I tried to explain that it was a little more about isolation and the character losing his sanity and his daily struggles.
Most of the people I know that didn't like that still said "Well it sucked anyways, it was too slow!"
LOL, the movie was only 90 minutes roughly.
See...these are why movies suck these days....it's because of people that want mindless action and always happy endings which make Hollywood want to do movies that appeal to them.
If they thought this was slow....a real true adapation of the book would be worse for them I think.
IMO the little boy kind of screwed up the ending, if he wasn't in the movie then they could have ended like the book. But i still liked the ending to the movieAt first I thought it would not be possible to keep the book ending since the infected were more animal-like than human, but upon closer consideration I think it still could have worked.
Think of the significance added to the scene where Anna (i.e. Ruth) is looking over all the pictures of Neville's test subjects... "So they all died?" ... "Yes". She could have had the same level of understanding and acceptance for Neville, but still give the "they're all afraid of you, some have been waiting all night to see you executed" speech.
I think it could have worked. Again, I really liked the film, don't get me wrong, though I would have preferred the real ending.
!snap
This movie was amazing, but when i saw it in imax my heart would not stop pounding.... amazing
IMO the little boy kind of screwed up the ending, if he wasn't in the movie then they could have ended like the book. But i still liked the ending to the movie
supposedly a more faithful ending had been shot, but was nixed because they feared too many people would be depressed by the ending.
which is kinda stupid because the premise of I Am Legend is depressing itself. Children of Men didn't sacrifice a depressing ending for a more hopeful one and look how great that movie was.
thats why i thought the movie should be rated RSeems like it is, yeah. One thing's for sure, it was darker and more depressing than the ending that ended up being in the theatrical cut. That's why WB nixed it - one months prior to the pic's release.