I do ask that comic book films retain the essence of the characters they are adapting. By essence I mean character traits and by that I mean personality, motivation, actions.
I think by that criteria...
Killian is the Mandarin, period. There are definitely some similarities with BB and TDKR, and some of the motivations for pulling the twist are doubtless the same.
But I think overall in IM3, it is more essential to the story. Ultimately, what difference does it make that Liam Neeson's character is Ra's, and not that other guy? Not much. It demonstrates the method of "theatricality and deception," but that's pretty much it. You get the same idea when a similar thing happens in TDKR.
But in IM3 it's about more than surprising the audience and demonstrating a technique: it really does change the nature of the character involved, but in a way that is meaningful. The Mandarin is revealed to be partly a façade, a bogeyman media creation. It's an improvement, really, over the concept we see in the comics. In the case of Ra's, it just meant the more famous actor was actually playing him. In TDKR, it just meant that Bane was a henchman all along. So, this twist has more layers to it.
But I think overall in IM3, it is more essential to the story. Ultimately, what difference does it make that Liam Neeson's character is Ra's, and not that other guy? Not much. It demonstrates the method of "theatricality and deception," but that's pretty much it. You get the same idea when a similar thing happens in TDKR.
But in IM3 it's about more than surprising the audience and demonstrating a technique: it really does change the nature of the character involved, but in a way that is meaningful. The Mandarin is revealed to be partly a façade, a bogeyman media creation. It's an improvement, really, over the concept we see in the comics. In the case of Ra's, it just meant the more famous actor was actually playing him. In TDKR, it just meant that Bane was a henchman all along. So, this twist has more layers to it.
So the third film curse really can't be applied to Iron Man when he's second film was frankly a waste of everyone's time and money.
Meh. Not a great movie, but pretty damn entertaining. Certainly not a waste by any means.
Last edited:
it's my favourite of the bunch, but even if Iron Man 2 was widely considered a masterpiece which clearly it isn't, it's (so far) set out to be in the same realm as TDKR was last year; acclaimed with critics and casuals and highly divisive among fans, but widely considered a lesser film than it's presessor. Lets not have some of the more militant Marvel fans start thinking that Iron Man is the perfect film trilogy to anyone else but them.
t: