LivingInClip said:
I love how when a semi-negative review comes in, everyone wants to discount that review as fast as possible.
that's not at ALL my point in posting.
Firstly, this thread is the definition of redundant considering this review is already being talked about in the Official Review thread
Secondly, negative reviews get consideration just fine on the site
Thirdly, the writers on the movie section at IGN really do suck. They really, really do. They're not good at it, at all. They're good at writing walkthroughs, but not movie reviews.
I'm not trying to discount the negative reviews, as I myself HIGHLIGHT some of the concerns that pop up in reviews (which would be discerned if people visited the Official Review thread instead of puking up, ADD-style, a brand new thread everytime they trip over a paragraph on the internet) i'm trying to discount IGN as a site worth reading when it comes to film criticism. Because they suck at it.
This isn't an attempt to make sure "my movie" gets protected from "big meanies" because I dont' even give a s**t about any of that. Film isnt a team-sport that I have to raise my foam finger and drink beer out of a hat to enjoy. I'm just saying, anyone trying to read IGN is in for some trouble if they like some depth and intelligence in their film writing.
If you just want fanboyism to the nth degree, unfiltered, you're better off on a messageboard.
edit: Oh s**t, Matches, man, where'd you go?