Superman Returns Official Rate and Review Superman Returns thread!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter J.Howlett
  • Start date Start date

How good was Superman Returns?

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Captain Kirk said:
:D Good to talk to you again Huntress! At least, you are more level headed than most on here. I really am obsessing a bit over this film.:O But I have high hopes that our faith is not in vain! Have a good time Tuesday at 10, and welcome Superman back for me! After Wednesday, It'll be fun to share stories about our viewing experience! One more thing,:O where will I ever meet a girl like you?:D

LOL...I'll be in line on Tuesday, so look for me there. After that I'm going to be hitting up Ten-Forward. You know where that's at:)

I agree though, it should be a fun ride. I'm nervous as heck about the kid, about how they will portray Supes and Lois, but I'm really looking forward to the release. The reviews are there, but I'm going to see the movie and give me own review. That's going to be the most important one.
 
charl_huntress said:
LOL...I'll be in line on Tuesday, so look for me there. After that I'm going to be hitting up Ten-Forward. You know where that's at:)

I agree though, it should be a fun ride. I'm nervous as heck about the kid, about how they will portray Supes and Lois, but I'm really looking forward to the release. The reviews are there, but I'm going to see the movie and give me own review. That's going to be the most important one.
:up: Sounds good! And definately true! I believe that we will Believe Again!!:)
 
OMG!!!!!

Though, are we sure it's POTC fans????? It could be Spidey or Marvel fans? I think we need to be sure of who we point the finger at before we all whoop up on their asses :)
 
So, what does this mean? (sorry, I was in exile the past few days..) that a fake review of Ebert's was floating around....and that's the real one, is that it?
 
There was a review with only 2 stars. And now there is one with 5 stars.

And we don't know which one is real. And some of us don't care. :)
 
charl_huntress said:
OMG!!!!!

Though, are we sure it's POTC fans????? It could be Spidey or Marvel fans? I think we need to be sure of who we point the finger at before we all whoop up on their asses :)
Yes, violence I love it! (graps a baseball bat) Let me at 'em!!:ghost:
 
LOL...LOL....

I didn't read the first review, so I don't know. However, what was scanned looked legit, but what do I know.

LOL....if it is true what idiot did this and why?????? I mean, don't you have any sort of life dude?

Anyway, Ebert's review will be up soon enough, so we will find out for ourselves. There isn't going to be a away to prove this so we should let it go and wait until we see the movie.

Though, this is some funny as ****.

Cap'n...I got a baseball bat handy if we need to handles some business.
 
Well, from what I found out....Ebert and Roper will have the review for Superman Returns airing next week.
 
box office mojo is saying the 4 star ones real but knowing ebert id say the 2 star one is.
 
Negative review from Slant Magazine
Superman Returns
Cast: Brandon Routh, Kate Bosworth, Kevin Spacey, James Marsden, Parker Posey, Frank Langella, Sam Huntington, Eva Marie Saint, Kal Penn, Noel Neill, Jack Larson and Marlon Brando
Directed by: Bryan Singer
Screenplay by: Michael Dougherty and Dan Harris
Distributor: Warner Bros.
Runtime: 154 min
Rating: PG-13
Year: 2006


Superman Returns is a pleasant enough piece of hackwork, anonymous in all the right ways so that it neither offends nor thrills. Like the massive model train set on which Lex Luthor (Kevin Spacey) demonstrates his latest plan for world domination (think An Inconvenient Truth by rent stabilized way of The Abyss), the film is little more than a crystalline maquette spit-polished to an illusive glow, a hollowed-out fortress of solitude that collapses in the face of any emotional expression above tentative (so best restrain the urge, fellow fanboys, to shout out "Kneel before Zod!"). On some level it's preferable that director Bryan Singer stays out of the material's way to the extent that he does, but after a distended two-and-a-half hours I was longing for the homo hauteur to let fly with his patented queer-release sledgehammer (in such ample use during the eye-candy X-Men pictures) and whack me hard upside the cremaster. At his root Superman is a decidedly non-sexual character (he's more an idealized and unattainable confluence of traits both Aryan and exotic), though as embodied here by stunning newcomer Brandon Routh his beauty comes across as particularly oppressive and fascistic. There's an Ayn Rand joke just waiting to be made in the image of Superman bearing The Daily Planet globe upon his shoulders and when the camera rises to join our tights-and-cape clad hero in the heavens it quite humorously suggests a digitized, Technicolor rendering of Patricia Neal's memorable ascent into Gary Cooper's crotch at the close of King Vidor's The Fountainhead. Yet aside from a reverse-motion shot of Superman inhaling the inverted and impossible breath of a Busby Berkeley extra while lifting a sunken ship out of the ocean, the themes and characters in Superman Returns remain frustratingly conceptual (reducing Harold & Kumar's Kal Penn to a mute, drool-jawed bystander is one egregious error out of the film's many). Singer steals amply from Spielberg's recent output, most notably in Superman Returns' recurrent half-glimpsed 9/11 imagery (prepare yourself for the eventual video bootleg that appends the film's first-act plane crash set piece onto the finale of United 93) and in some half-baked father/son shenanigans (complete with Sky Captain-esque resurrection of Marlon Brando) that I would have more readily accepted had the film had the cajones to play its climactic scenes as the straight-male weepie version of Longtime Companion that they threaten to become.
 
I don't think that was posted. It was said by someone with insider information, so at this point it's all a matter of who you believe.

I'm with ChrisBale...we will find out soon enough.
 
The one that Excel posted was posted on BlueTights and is a fake.
http://www.bluetights.net/theplanet/showthread.php?t=14086&page=113&pp=15 First one on the page.

The person who SAW IT IN THE NEWSPAPER, posted here a few pages ago.

A person with early access to Ebert's reviews posted about it on OscarWatch.com.

If Ebert and Roeper were to give it positive reviews, don't you think they would have done an early review like they do when they give big movies two thumbs up? We know what Roeper thought...
 
the thing is that the 2 star review has th emovie listed at 140 minutes, which is 15 mintues off, while the 4 star has 156 minutes, much closer to the actual time. neither are correctas it it 153 minutes.
 
:confused: What the heck is Slant magazine. What is that dude saying? Sounds to me like he was seeing the wrong movie. I am sure he could rent Brokeback Mountain to satisfy his needs. Eeew!
 
Captain Kirk said:
:confused: What the heck is Slant magazine. What is that dude saying? Sounds to me like he was seeing the wrong movie. I am sure he could rent Brokeback Mountain to satisfy his needs. Eeew!

It's obvious he cares nothing about the movie, knows nothing of the Superman mythos and just wanted to find out how much unneded subjective crap he could fit into a review.
 
cause hes an idiot. he called xmen 1 and 2 dumb fun while x3 was full f emotion and plot
 

Members online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,435
Messages
22,105,934
Members
45,898
Latest member
NeonWaves64
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"