Superman Returns Official Rate and Review Superman Returns thread!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter J.Howlett
  • Start date Start date

How good was Superman Returns?

  • 10

  • 9

  • 8

  • 7

  • 6

  • 5

  • 4

  • 3

  • 2

  • 1


Results are only viewable after voting.
Nivek said:
No, I just think it is a sad testiment that some fans feel that the villian needs to die in these flicks, usually falling Gruber style to their death.
But the poster didn't even mention the mortality of Luthor.
 
theogt said:
Sounds like he liked the film but thinks STM is a greatest movie of all time. "I missed terribly Valerie Perrine and Ned Betaty as Luthor's sidekicks"???? WTF? I can't take this guy's opinion seriously after that.

:up:
 
Nivek said:
No, my issue was how she let her make-up distract her performance, and how she delivered her lines. Goyer had some influence, but its how she worked the role that made it bad. Hey, she wasn't all that great in Scream 3 either.
The director had some influence? He's the director. Acting chops alone will take you a long way, but the director makes or break the performance. He calls the shots. Says whether its good enough or not. Chooses which shot is best. It's his call, not the actors as to how the line is delivered.
 
theogt said:
Sounds like he liked the film but thinks STM is a greatest movie of all time. "I missed terribly Valerie Perrine and Ned Betaty as Luthor's sidekicks"???? WTF? I can't take this guy's opinion seriously after that.
So in that case, you believe that AICN was completely off when it was said the film was good? So you believe the movie is bad now, simply because he liked Otis?
 
Jakomus said:
So in that case, you believe that AICN was completely off when it was said the film was good? So you believe the movie is bad now, simply because he liked Otis?
You got that out of what I wrote?
 
theogt said:
The director had some influence? He's the director. Acting chops alone will take you a long way, but the director makes or break the performance. He calls the shots. Says whether its good enough or not. Chooses which shot is best. It's his call, not the actors as to how the line is delivered.

And she still was the one acting through plastic teeth and SPFX contacts. If she couldn't work around it, she should have said something. Goyer made alot of missteps in Blade 3, I'll admit that in a heartbeat, unfortunatly Poseys performance falls alot on her inability to work with make-up limitations. Ron Perlman she is not.

Enough about her, back to the AICN review...
 
theogt said:
You got that out of what I wrote?
You said you couldn't take his opinion seriously, and his opinion is that Superman Returns was good.
 
Jakomus said:
You said you couldn't take his opinion seriously, and his opinion is that Superman Returns was good.
Right. So how does that lead to me thinking the movie is bad?
 
theogt said:
Right. So how does that lead to me thinking the movie is bad?
You know what, forget it. The sarcasm was lost on you.
 
Possey did suck in Blade 3 and I don't trust any review from Aint it Cool or any other nerd website, including CHUD who's reviews I tend to like.
 
Jakomus said:
You know what, forget it. The sarcasm was lost on you.
If there was intended sarcasm in your post I think it was lost when your fingers hit the keyboard.
 
I thought "good" and "great" were the same thing. Or at least similar....

:up:
 
ultimatefan said:
Well, for me the LAST THING that would work for Superman is a restart. To me Donner did a stellar job with the origin, and I don´t think there´s anything post-crisis that would justify ignoring or replacing his version. And Lex isn´t just a mad scientist, that I know the tycoon Lex thing is there, too.
It´s your opinion, and i respect that, but...
Everytime i talk about Donner´s Superman, i end up saying the same thing, so, for the last time (yeah, right), Donner did a stellar job, i agree on that, but he did a stellar job for the time.
Today, it is totally and undeniably outdated.

Jonathan Kent is still alive, Kal-El didn´t picked up the truck moments after he arrived, much less arrive at the age of 5 (or something), he didn´t threw a green crystal into Antartida that created a crystal like Fortress of Solitude, he didn´t learned his Kryptonian heritage from a vitual reality version of Jor-El................do i really need to go on?

Don´t take it personaly Ultimatefan, you´re one of the good guys around here (and i don´t mean the Superman forums, but all SHH! boards), but i can not compete when someone says that Superman doesn´t need a restart, because we had Donner´s version.
As you can see above, not only Donner´s Superman is outdated, it´s (not by his fault or the movie, but rather the time it was made) stupid.
Donner´s Superman (i refuse to call it The Movie, because any movie with The Movie subtitle in it, or, The Adventure of...,IMO, is just pathetic) is an amazing movie, the best pre-crisis movie ever made...but the key word is PRE-CRISIS
 
Jakomus, calm down. I wasn't trying to start anything with her. On the other hand, it looks like you're doing EXACTLY what you're accusing me of by blowing my statement completely out of proportion. .

She said the critics overrated X2, and I wanted to draw a comparison to MY OPINION that I think the people overrate Spider-Man movies, which I stand by. They're good movies, but I find they have pretty poor rewatch factor, especially the 2nd one.

Nothing more.
 
Hello good sirs, where is the proof that anyone at Latino review saw the above mentioned film. This review only has merit if there is proof. Double standard, sirs. Negative reviews are dismissed because of lack of proof. So should positive ones. Have a good day.
 
WOW if it is a "bad" review...Superman Returns is going to be amazing! :eek:
 
tabLengle said:
Hello good sirs, where is the proof that anyone at Latino review saw the above mentioned film. This review only has merit if there is proof. Double standard, sirs. Negative reviews are dismissed because of lack of proof. So should positive ones. Have a good day.

Another hater, who cant understand that SR will be great movie :rolleyes:

I am going to kill you with the help of my heat-vision :mad:
 
tabLengle said:
Hello good sirs, where is the proof that anyone at Latino review saw the above mentioned film.
3 out of every 4 fanboys agree that LatinoReview.com is a reliable source for movie news and reviews, hehe. they don't need proof...they've earned their good reputation.
 
DorkyFresh said:
3 out of every 4 fanboys agree that LatinoReview.com is a reliable source for movie news and reviews, hehe. they don't need proof...they've earned their good reputation.

Dorky, you are always here to help somebody, thanx :) :up:
 
Reviews are really unreliable. Take this with a grain of salt. Not that I am saying I don't think the movie will be good...
 
Cinemaman said:
Dorky, you are always here to help somebody, thanx :) :up:
i'm not here to help anyone...i'm just sayin' it like it is.
 
theogt said:
If there was intended sarcasm in your post I think it was lost when your fingers hit the keyboard.

That's a win right there :)

I'm with Theo on this--I don't know if I'll like the movie, but chances are I'm not gonna come from the same place this dude came from when I sit down, because I'm not at ALL going to miss Otis and Tesmacher.

I also tossed Wells' review because Jeffrey Wells is utterly bats**t insane.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,435
Messages
22,105,461
Members
45,898
Latest member
NeonWaves64
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"