On Reading Reviews: A Different Vision for Us?

I don't know if this was a final cut or a test, but there are certain editing choices that left me scratching my head (Rogue's finale, Cyclops' role, scenes that felt off due to certain special effects). Maybe they'll fix these slight problems. I wasn't sure if this was the final cut/ print or not.


http://www.superherohype.com/forums/showthread.php?t=231748


somethin's up, guys!
 
yeah i know what you mean...if that is the final cut...i'm going to be pissed...but lets wait till the 25th/26th of May
 
:mad:

I just want to know for sure, what's going on...I don't want to get my hopes up.. :(

-TNC
 
Something is definitely up. I'm thinking we might get the Xavier monologue and Cerebro door too in the final version bosef.
 
If it's the final cut then I'm kinda okay with it except Cyclops. If the movie can be improved it can't be bad
 
TNC9852002 said:
:mad:

I just want to know for sure, what's going on...I don't want to get my hopes up.. :(

-TNC

I know exactly how you feel TNC but imo the lack of Mystique computerised voice and Storm's tidal wave in the press screening indicates to me that something is up.
 
ya know what.....even if we DONT get a firebird in the final cut... ill be happy with the death she already dishes out, because alot of, well most of them are saying teh "pheonix effect" is already great! sooo, i think it will do her justice... in the grounded real world of singer-verse.
 
TNC9852002 said:
:mad:

I just want to know for sure, what's going on...I don't want to get my hopes up.. :(

-TNC

We know how you feel man, but looking at all our sources. We will be getting a different version and it will probably be longer since the MSN review saying that the movie was 2 hours.
 
Spidey 2007 said:
ya know what.....even if we DONT get a firebird in the final cut... ill be happy with the death she already dishes out, because alot of, well most of them are saying teh "pheonix effect" is already great! sooo, i think it will do her justice... in the grounded real world of singer-verse.

You know we will be getting the pheonix effect. It's an important part of her resurrection.
 
Spidey 2007 said:
ya know what.....even if we DONT get a firebird in the final cut... ill be happy with the death she already dishes out, because alot of, well most of them are saying teh "pheonix effect" is already great! sooo, i think it will do her justice... in the grounded real world of singer-verse.

Maybe. I'll be disappointed tbh though, if Storm's tidal wave sequence isn't in the final version of the movie!
 
bosef982 said:
This could mean the Cerebro Door and stuff is still in.

I hope so... thats so fricken easy to contribute to feeling like a legitimate extension. Thats like throwing Ratner a softball.
 
XCharlieX said:
I hope so... thats so fricken easy to contribute to feeling like a legitimate extension. Thats like throwing Ratner a softball.

exactly - with all their talk of continuity the monologue and Cerebro door at the start should be obvious choices for inclusion in X3!
 
There is actually a chance theyre not done with the opening credits computer fx perhaps... thats all i hope really makes it to the final cut... oh well.

I actually do not think this firebird thing is neccessarily in, and personally dont mind..as long as the alternatives good.
 
Storm22 said:
exactly - with all their talk of continuity the monologue and Cerebro door at the start should be obvious choices for inclusion in X3!

Right. But this is stuff that is likely possible to be added in by the debut.
 
The Original Bamfer said:
Right. But this is stuff that is likely possible to be added in by the debut.

Hopefully! I'd also like to see more of the DR Sentinel than the head which if Wolverini is to believed we will actually see in the theatrical version.
 
That could be.. those type of sequences take a while to cgi up and often are the last things to be done... i hope for it, but its no big deal.
 
Ursavior01 said:
We know how you feel man, but looking at all our sources. We will be getting a different version and it will probably be longer since the MSN review saying that the movie was 2 hours.

The problem with the MSN review saying the movie was 2 hours is that 103 minutes to someone who is not looking at their watch all the time can seem like 2 hours. Maybe they used it as just a general term?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,381
Messages
22,094,707
Members
45,889
Latest member
Starman68
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"