AS an English Major (at one time), I must point out, that the SEGMENT you are refering to above, IN ORDER...is saying they were together, they loved each other, but then didn't pull the trigger on the wedding day.
Those listed can lead you to surmise, yes, Pete still proposed. IT doesn't say that, but you can easily SURMISE that since they 'didn't pull the trigger on their WEDDING DAY".
No where, in THAT sequence of events does it say then they lived together for 20 years afte...happily ever after.
Statistically speaking,...couples who are "left at the alter" do not stay together after a traumatic situation like that, (mental betrayal) or if at all...NOT for very long, weeks maybe, but not for 20 years. That is a big leap logically, for THAT SITUATION that Joe put out. There better be an AMAZING story to pull that off then.
And to use your own logic and others..who have said, THEY CAN"T DIVORCE THEM, THEY HAD TO DO A DEVIL DEAL, THEY"VE BEEN MARRIED TOOLONG FOR 20 YEARS! Using that same logic people defend with then...from that angle, why would they break up after everything (unbelievably) staying the same and living together for twenty years, on top of a BROKEN WEDDING, WHY would they split??? Again, if this is true, it is another thing that doesn't make sense logically.
The thing is, to be real here, they've all been just saying A LOT of stuff that makes no sense....just to try and bandaid, or quick fix the million HOLES they know they've created.