Elaborating that point was irrelevant to the entire argument, unless you want me to write an entire script. You're the one making the implication that a Peter who can create the web shooters, isn't smart enough to create something else or find alternatives to fix his financial problems.
You're the one who started personal jabs just because you couldn't even debate my point about how we need to suspend our disbelief with both organics and mechanicals. Oh wait you did try to debate this except you referenced the comics(as if those don't require suspension of disbelief as well).
So you're saying that the addition of webshooters means that Peter is intelligent enough to build other things, so does that mean you're saying an organic web Peter is stupider? And thus, mechanical webshooters provide a template to accentuate peters intelligence? Wonderful
Except, I addressed that, multiple times.
Mechanical stuff does not face the limit his biology would face, to consistently be producing that would need energy on a far more frequent basis than the mechanical stuff
Regardless of how the web material is stored, its still an extremely limited amount of webbing.
Well, evidently it's not based on 50 years of comics
Clearly the webbing is not limited, we know the system is economical with his fluid and throughout 50 years of comics we've been able to decipher a general idea of how long the webs last. Unlike organics this is actually explained.
Raimi never goes into specifics, it's "he moves his hand, web comes out". You cannot even say where the web comes from, so how can you know about the specifics and intricacies of it? Webshooters have been explained time after time and yet the biggest explanation of organics we've gotten is a tie between "go web go" and "lol no it's not his veins"
And what could he actually do? You're leaving that bit out
The reason I asked you to elaborate is that the concept of better benefiting from the pain of others had already been brought up and debunked and I tthink in your heart of hearts you know that too.
So yes, I've attempted to address what little points you have, and suprise surprise, because you can't elaborate, I can't debate on non existent points.
If you feel I'm making personal jabs at you, report it, becuase that's not allowed.
Otherwise, please attempt to make a point