spiderman2
Superhero
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2014
- Messages
- 9,921
- Reaction score
- 848
- Points
- 73
Refer to the article I posted. Not only does it point out the rationale for Carroll's decision, but how Belichick might have forced that.
As the article says, I think Carroll was afraid of having to use his final timeout in that situation (if Lynch got stuffed at the line). In the back of his mind, he probably thought the worst that could come out of it would be an incomplete pass and the clock would stop. I don't think he expected Wilson to make that kind of throw in that situation.
I would have completely understood them wanting to run the ball after that play, but in my opinion, it was still a legitimate thought process on the part of the coaching staff to go with the pass there. The execution was where they fell short, and I believe it was specifically even pointed out by Seattle's OC (how Lockette was soft on the ball). That and the ball placement is more at fault, but that's just my opinion.
I don't see how Belichec forced any thing. If any thing Belicheck made a big mistake him self by not calling a time out. They should have called a time out there selfs because if seahawks score new England would have only had like 10-20 seconds left instead of like a minute to get a FG to tie the game if seahawks had scored and I don't see how there thought process was a legitimated thought at all. So what if you run the ball and get stoped and have to use a time out you still would have like 20 second left and 3erd and 4th Down. What are they worried that on 3erd down they are going to get sacked and not have time to get another play off or something? Makes zero sinces. The coached just flat out made a big big mistake. Plus they if they wanted to have a little more time so that in cause something like a sack happens they could have done a better job not taking like 40 seconds to get the play off in the first place.

t

