I did wonder why Hector didn't just tell his wife he was on his way home when he died after they met back up in the city of the dead. That way she'd know he didn't abandon them and shouldn't be angry at him, except they needed to do that for the plot I guess.
You might be over thinking it, I don't think it mattered that much. I have to see it again, but as far as I recall, hector never knew he was poisoned, he like everyone else believed he died eating a spicy chrorizo?
The shame of this, as well being ostracized by the family for leaving, kept them (and the truth) apart, even after death.
I was also interested in the fact that there was almost no theology involved in a movie which deals largely with the afterlife. No mention of God or heaven or hell.
Yeah it wasn't about that , but more how someone truly lives on in those who remember them.
Kind of the point.
Apparently we're looking at an exclusively Mexican/ Hispanic afterlife that only exists for those who have a Day of the Dead tradition. I suppose other religions have their own special afterlife worlds? It certainly brings up some philosophical questions, such as what this afterlife world was like in the days before photography...
The photo in real life and in the film is just a modern convenience, an easy way to convey the idea, on an alter anything that once belong to the person, a memento you associate with them, will do, as long as it reminds you of them, is all that maters.
For the film the photo was the easiest way to convey this, folded and ripped it served two plot points, to first reveal the wrong identity, and finally the true one.
And since Miguel's ancestor actually wrote "Remember Me", could his family sue de la Cruz's estate for back royalties to the song?
LOL, I think you're bringing the real world into it to much.
They are happy to know the truth, and the family now will never forget Miguel.