Possible Captain America "Easter Egg"??

[Sardaukar]

deleted

 

[Mr. Socko]

Why the hell would Fox have a Caps cameo in their film...

 

[Untilteld]

they don't own rights, do they?

 

[Kelly]

No, they don't.....thats why its not caps....

 

[Ryo Jin]

It's stupid. If the clip kept going it would've continued showing Surfer creating the giant hole in Greenland. If only we could post screencaps without reprecussions like on the SM3 and TDK boards

 

[xii22_loop]

lol so who wants to get banned for the greater good?

 

[Kelly]

Um, hello...............guys..........................its not Capt. America..........Fox does not have the rights.................................thats your answer. No need to post and show anything.......................ok?

 

[Ryo Jin]

Yeah, but flaunting with picture proof is always fun. Damn reprecussions!

 

[Iron_Stark]

Um, hello...............guys..........................its not Capt. America..........Fox does not have the rights.................................thats your answer. No need to post and show anything.......................ok?

That's why it's called an "easter egg", they'll never come out and say "Hey look we put in Captain America".

Just like when Punisher showed up at the end of Spider-Man 2, Thomas Jane was there with his black shirt when MJ ran past him in her wedding dress, but Sony never came out and said they filmed the Big Pun.

 

[Ryo Jin]

That's why it's called an "easter egg", they'll never come out and say "Hey look we put in Captain America".

Just like when Punisher showed up at the end of Spider-Man 2, Thomas Jane was there with his black shirt when MJ ran past him in her wedding dress, but Sony never came out and said they filmed the Big Pun.

True that. But whether that was Tom Jane or not, what are the chances of seeing a guy that LOOKS like Tom Jane in all black who's based on a character that first appeared in a Spider-man comic? They did it intentionally.

However in this case it's the Surfer. No doubts, I *cough*havethemovieinDVDquality*cough*

 

[Iron_Stark]

True that. But whether that was Tom Jane or not, what are the chances of seeing a guy that LOOKS like Tom Jane in all black who's based on a character that first appeared in a Spider-man comic? They did it intentionally.

However in this case it's the Surfer. No doubts, I *cough*havethemovieinDVDquality*cough*

Tom Jane himself said he did the little cameo.

 

[Ryo Jin]

Tom Jane himself said he did the little cameo.

Really? Where?

 

[Drake Retro]

yeah its the surfer

 

[3dman27]

it doesn't work

 

[Flash-er]

Um, hello...............guys..........................its not Capt. America..........Fox does not have the rights.................................thats your answer. No need to post and show anything.......................ok?

Fox doesn't need to have the rights to the character to have "someone" frozen in a glacier. There's no evidence to say it's Cap. America. No costume, no shield, not even a red/white/blue coloring, so Fox easily could have a person in the glacier and let the fanboys get excited about it.

That said, I don't think it's Cap. I don't even think it's an intended human form. It has some humanoid shape to it, sure. But I think that's by accident and it's a case of people seeing what they want to see. Here's the example using the picture in question.

In the first image, you have shape everyone's talking about. in the second, you could picture it being almost an entire human body, the head hidden in shadow. And in the third, you could imagine it being the legs of someone.

 

[Kelly]

And I also see a picture of Jesus in there.......call the pope.

 

[Ryo Jin]

Fox doesn't need to have the rights to the character to have "someone" frozen in a glacier. There's no evidence to say it's Cap. America. No costume, no shield, not even a red/white/blue coloring, so Fox easily could have a person in the glacier and let the fanboys get excited about it.

That said, I don't think it's Cap. I don't even think it's an intended human form. It has some humanoid shape to it, sure. But I think that's by accident and it's a case of people seeing what they want to see. Here's the example using the picture in question.

In the first image, you have shape everyone's talking about. in the second, you could picture it being almost an entire human body, the head hidden in shadow. And in the third, you could imagine it being the legs of someone.

I already said it's the Surfer! I have the freaking movie

 

[Flash-er]

I already said it's the Surfer! I have the freaking movie

Congratulations. That also means you should be arrested for bootlegs.

 

[Ryo Jin]

Congratulations. That also means you should be arrested for bootlegs.

Who said I still had it? Blame Fox for not releasing it simultaneously internationally! But in all seriousness, I watched it, got rid of it, and ended up paying to see it anyway.

 

[Flash-er]

I just saw it yesterday and yeah, it's obviously the Surfer... where did the idea of it being CA even come from?

 

[Kelly]

Who knows....

 

[Tony Stark]

It wasn't the Surfer, it was Jack Kirby's cameo. ;P

 

[Iron Maiden]

Methinks it started because it came from a poor quality screen capture (maybe a cellphone?) or bad bootleg and it wasn't clear what the figure was being shown. Of course, any Marvel thinks of Captain America when you hear about a figure frozen in ice, don't they?

 

[Caliber]

It lools like a hood more than Cap. When is Doom in ice?

 

[Kelly]

It is the Silver Surfer moving up through the ice....