Spider-Who?
ERMERGERD!
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2001
- Messages
- 11,346
- Reaction score
- 14
- Points
- 58
Well we can't be informed of all the things that exist.
But we CAN keep ourselves from forming opinions and making arguments touted as fact when we are not informed enough to say such things - you had no idea about the Eskimo topic, yet you fired off "facts" to cement your point, totally irregardless of the actual facts. You need to ask yourself: "What ELSE am I saying that I don't really know for certain?"
I meant that meat has too much protein and fat for us who live in normal environments to be of any good. Too much protein harms us. That's a fact and you can't say I can measure how much protein I eat from an animal. It is practically impossible.
First you say "meat has too much protein." Then IN THE SAME PARAGRAPH you say that it's "impossible" to measure the protein in meat. Which is it? I'll save you time: both of those statements are remarkably false.
Secondly, the point you tried to ignore by making those fun little claims is the fact that you believe that a vegetarian diet is all humans need - that it's the perfect amount of nutrition, the only right choice. But even by your own admission, Eskimo's needed a diet of meat in order to survive. It doesn't matter that they live in a cold climate...this truth negates your claim, plain and simple. There are 7 billion people in the world. All with different dietary needs based on numerous factors including health, age, genetics, location/climate. It's totally asinine to say that an all vegetable diet is all ANYONE needs, especially when the fallacy in that statement is so obvious.
When did I insulted anyone or treated him in a hostile way? I am just responding posing my view of things.
What? How did you get accusations of insults and hostility out of this: "You may not force your will on people personally, but you surely are content with others imposing a notion you agree with. There is very little difference between the two."
In other words, you claim that you aren't out to force people to become vegans, yet you proudly applaud a system that would. It's like saying "I don't go out and picket with them, but I applaud Westboro Baptist Church's message." (note: I'm by no means comparing you or your diet to WBC, I'm merely using them as an example to get the point across).
They have plenty of choices out of school to eat whatever they want. It's not like they forced them not to eat meat for the rest of their lives.
Many poor kids, sadly, are only able to each lunch at school thanks to financial aid programs offering school lunches at discount price, or even free. Does their inability to choose their meals not matter? What about kids with illnesses that require a certain diet, one that isn't met by the schools new reduced menu? I'm by no means saying healthy food is bad, nor that schools should continue to offer unhealthy food - what I'm saying is that eliminating a major portion of the food pyramid is not the appropriate action.
Last edited: