Ratings

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've also come to the conclusion that some people will watch CBS no matter what repetitive crap they put on the network. I mean for the love of god, how many crime dramas can you watch? :down

You know something, I dont even know what channel CBS is on here where I live. And I watched enough crime dramas in the '70's that I was done in for life. I dont tune in to them anymore at all.
 
vyperman7 said:
I think they refered to the show as fading, because of what it used to get in the ratings.

During the first season, Smallville pulled in 6-7 million viewers an episode.

During the second season, it pulled in between 7-8 million viewers an episode, with an all time high of just over nine million for Rosetta.

Now when you compare the ratings, Smallville is practically only getting half of what it used to. While the ratings are still decent for a WB show, there has been a considerable decline from when the show was at its peak, popularity wise.

:up: :up: :up:

You hit the nail on the coffin!
Smallvile at it's peak IMHO(Season 2) repeat episodes pull-in 5.8 Million.
The rating for this seaon premier, IS NOT GOOD!
Although, ratings are down across the board for THE WB as a whole! UPN is winnning the rating war between the little networks.

Hardcore SMALLVILLE viewers are SUPERMAN fans who watch the show to observe Clark's evolution to KAL'El / SUPERMAN.
The fans were lead to believe that at the end of the series, a film or films would continue the escapades of KAL'El / SUPERMAN. :up:
SUPERMAN Returns kills that! :down
what's the point in continuing to watch smallville if CLARK is NOT allowed to become SUPERMAN. :o where is the payoff in continued viewing of the show?
Sign me off! SMALLVILLE is like,SO OVER! :mad:
 
Read in the LA Times today that Smallville had 5.9 Million viewers for Thursday
 
Billy Batson said:
...The rating for this season premier, IS NOT GOOD!
Come back when you know what you're talking about. You obviously know NOTHING about how ratings really work.

Hardcore SMALLVILLE viewers are SUPERMAN fans who watch the show to observe Clark's evolution to KAL'El / SUPERMAN.
Hysterical. Truly hysterical!

The fans were lead to believe that at the end of the series, a film or films would continue the escapades of KAL'El / SUPERMAN.
They were? That's a new one.

SUPERMAN Returns kills that!
:rolleyes: Y'know, I'm FAR from being a fan of SR, but the last thing the film will do is hurt SV.

what's the point in continuing to watch smallville if CLARK is NOT allowed to become SUPERMAN.
WTF? This season is Superman in Training. If you want to see him flying around in the tights, SV is not for you. The whole premise of the show is to elaborate on the events in Superman's life *before* he became known to the world as Superman.

where is the payoff in continued viewing of the show?
If you don't enjoy it now, five seasons in, you never will. Please, stop watching it before you hurt yourself.

Sign me off! SMALLVILLE is like,SO OVER! :mad:
Later dude. Life is tough. Get a helmet. ;)
 
Smallville has a higher "share" now then they've ever had. the show is also on a hell of a lot more competitive night than it was in S1 and S2. Comparing the "rating" number between seasons without taking into account those other pretty big considerations is short-sighted.
 
The Incredible Hulk said:
Smallville has a higher "share" now then they've ever had. the show is also on a hell of a lot more competitive night than it was in S1 and S2. Comparing the "rating" number between seasons without taking into account those other pretty big considerations is short-sighted.

Excellent post. :up:
 
These ratings are pretty much ridiculous. I never expected the show to rate that high -- I still don't believe they can sustain this level. Thurs night is a death day for any show that isn't popular. I was expecting a successful night to be somewhere in the high 2's.

It's even better news when you consider that Smallville beat shows that air on networks that have FAR more reach then the WB. If Smallville was airing on NBC, CBS, ABC, or FOX it would have done even better then it did.
 
Zing79 said:
These ratings are pretty much ridiculous. I never expected the show to rate that high -- I still don't believe they can sustain this level...
Yeah, they usually do quite well out of the gate on premiere night and then start losing numbers before leveling off. This is typical for MOST returning shows, particularly ones with cliffhangers from the previous season. Networks usually pay more attention to a show's ratings figures during its second and third week into the season, which is why some Nets wait a week or so before premiering - it makes other shows look bad when *their* numbers drop. The World Series and football season are going to take a toll too, but at least those threats will apply to everybody except the network they're broadcast on. Anyhoo, I seriously don't expect the ratings for Mortal to be as high as they were for Arrival, but I'm hoping the decline is modest.

Three days and counting. ;)
 
Well I'm glad to see SV getting some good recognition. With winning their slot in men 18-34 winning overall viewership can't be far behind.

Hopefully this means that the end is near for Survivor. I really cant stand that show.
 
AgentPat said:
^ Definition of an eternal optimist

;)

Just want something to change. There arent many original shows on network TV now. Everything is a CSI, L&O, or ER knock off.

I'm hoping that continued high ratings by SV may pave the way for some better programming.
 
NHawk19 said:
Just want something to change. There arent many original shows on network TV now. Everything is a CSI, L&O, or ER knock off.

I'm hoping that continued high ratings by SV may pave the way for some better programming.

I'm hoping with you.
 
The final tally of Thursday night's ratings courtesy of MediaWeek:

Ratings Box:
What’s Hot/What’s Not

-Final Thursday Nationals:
In another mammoth Thursday victory, must see CBS outdelivered No. 2 NBC by 85 percent in households, 10.93 million viewers and 44 percent among adults 18-49. The retooled WB, meanwhile, bested rival UPN by 25 percent in households, 750,000 viewers and 18 percent among adults 18-49 despite the presence of UPN’s highly touted Everybody Hates Chris. Although Everybody Hates Chris suffered double-digit losses in week two, if the sitcom levels off at Thursday’s 6.01 million viewers (#5) and a 2.4/ 7 among adults 18-49 (#6), the future looks promising. Smallville jump-started the WB in the Thursday 8 p.m. hour, with 5.90 million viewers (#5) and a 2.6/ 7 among adults 18-49 (#5).

In series-premiere news, although ABC’s The Night Stalker could not take a bite out of the competition at a distant third-place 7.12 million viewers and a 2.6/ 6 among adults 18-49 at 9 p.m., it was still considerably better than year-ago occupant, life as we know it. That led out of the season-premiere of Alias at a modest 8.21 million viewers (#3) and a 2.5/ 7 among adults 18-49 (#5). Over at Fox, episode three of drama Reunion dipped to a series-low (and fourth-place) 4.55 million viewers and a 2.3/ 6 among adults 18-49, with retention of 69 and 77 percent, respectively, out of The O.C. (Viewers: #4, 6.56 million; A18-49: #3, 3.0/ 8).

What follows are the final national ratings for Thursday, Sept. 29:

-Households:
CBS: 13.9/22, NBC: 7.5/12, ABC: 4.8/ 7, Fox: 3.6/ 6, WB: 3.0/ 5, UPN: 2.4/ 4

-Total Viewers:
CBS: 22.13 million, NBC: 11.20, ABC: 7.02, Fox: 5.56, WB: 4.71, UPN: 3.96

-Adults 18-49:
CBS: 7.2/19, NBC: 5.0/13, Fox: 2.6/ 7, ABC: 2.2/ 6, WB: 2.0/ 5, UPN: 1.7/ 4

Source: Nielsen Media Research data
 
Billy Batson said:
...ratings are down across the board for THE WB as a whole! UPN is winnning the rating war between the little networks.
Not to dig up this debate again, but SV is to The WB like Lost and Desperate Housewives is to ABC. It's *other* shows on The WB that are dragging their overall ratings into the mud.

Friday's ratings (10/30/05)

Also struggling on Friday is the WB, which ranked last in every half-hour with its sitcom combination of What I Like About You (HH: 1.4/ 3; Viewers: 2.06 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 4), Twins (HH: 1.5/ 3; Viewers: 2.18 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 4), a depressed Reba (HH: 2.1/ 4; Viewers: 3.03 million; A18-49: 1.2/ 4), and a should-be-funnier Living With Fran (HH: 1.7/ 3; Viewers: 2.42 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 3). If Fran really wants to find her way, she needs to dump wooden Charles Shaugnessy as her ex-husband, and drag Renee Taylor out of retirement (or wherever she is) and bring her back as her whiny mother. Mama Renee would be plotzing is she saw how young her live-in love Riley is!​

http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/newsletters/proginsider/index.jsp
 
AgentPat said:
Not to dig up this debate again, but SV is to The WB like Lost and Desperate Housewives is to ABC. It's *other* shows on The WB that are dragging their overall ratings into the mud.

Friday's ratings (10/30/05)


Also struggling on Friday is the WB, which ranked last in every half-hour with its sitcom combination of What I Like About You (HH: 1.4/ 3; Viewers: 2.06 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 4), Twins (HH: 1.5/ 3; Viewers: 2.18 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 4), a depressed Reba (HH: 2.1/ 4; Viewers: 3.03 million; A18-49: 1.2/ 4), and a should-be-funnier Living With Fran (HH: 1.7/ 3; Viewers: 2.42 million; A18-49: 1.0/ 3). If Fran really wants to find her way, she needs to dump wooden Charles Shaugnessy as her ex-husband, and drag Renee Taylor out of retirement (or wherever she is) and bring her back as her whiny mother. Mama Renee would be plotzing is she saw how young her live-in love Riley is!​

http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/newsletters/proginsider/index.jsp

Considering that the WB doesnt reach everywhere across the country, and they are such an iddy biddy station compared to the big networks, are those ratings really that bad?
 
USA Today's take on the ratings:

http://www.usatoday.com/life/television/news/2005-10-04-nielsen-analysis_x.htm
•Fighting for second. CBS' Survivor easily took the top spot in the Thursday at 8 p.m. ET/PT battleground. Its 17.3 million viewers more than doubled second-place Alias (8.2 million), which was separated from sixth-place Smallville by just 2.3 million viewers. After a record-setting premiere for UPN, Everybody Hates Chris dropped 23% to 6 million viewers in its second week. Among young-adult viewers, however, Smallville finished fourth in its new time period, boosting WB's performance.
 
This was an absolutely hysterical read. And it was refreshing to finally see at least ONE TV critic not laud Everybody Hates Chris like it was the second coming of All in the Family or something. :rolleyes:

Here's an excerpt...

Between the networks’ aggressive Kill ‘Em All, Let Nielsen Sort ‘Em Out programming tactics and an unusual amount of new shows that don’t make you want to repeatedly bash your skull against the TV screen until the sweet release of cathode blackout takes hold (well, once Head Cases was canceled), scheduling quality time with the new television season has been a beeotch. My own overworked TiVo is substituting its factory-standard “bloop bloop bloop” sound effect for “Christ! Read a book or something already!”

To make your/my busy life simpler, True TV is going to tell you exactly what to watch first, what to record for later viewing and what to avoid like Jennifer Garner at Baby Gap.

Thursdays

Watch: When Fox’s Major League Baseball coverage mercifully ends in November, The O.C. and Reunion are too soaptastic to experience without commercial breaks in which to ask yourself, “WTF?” Until then, try Smallville and Everwood on The WB—less funny, more flannel. Or maybe Everybody Hates Chris (UPN) … nah.

Record: Alias (ABC), CSI and Without a Trace (CBS), due to their obvious storylines that make as much sense in fast-forward as they do in real time.

Avoid: Survivor: Guatemala (CBS), The Night Stalker (ABC) and everything on NBC and UPN.​

http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2005/tube_2005-10-06.cfm
 
AgentPat said:
This was an absolutely hysterical read. And it was refreshing to finally see at least ONE TV critic not laud Everybody Hates Chris like it was the second coming of All in the Family or something. :rolleyes:

Here's an excerpt...



Between the networks’ aggressive Kill ‘Em All, Let Nielsen Sort ‘Em Out programming tactics and an unusual amount of new shows that don’t make you want to repeatedly bash your skull against the TV screen until the sweet release of cathode blackout takes hold (well, once Head Cases was canceled), scheduling quality time with the new television season has been a beeotch. My own overworked TiVo is substituting its factory-standard “bloop bloop bloop” sound effect for “Christ! Read a book or something already!”



To make your/my busy life simpler, True TV is going to tell you exactly what to watch first, what to record for later viewing and what to avoid like Jennifer Garner at Baby Gap.

Thursdays

Watch: When Fox’s Major League Baseball coverage mercifully ends in November, The O.C. and Reunion are too soaptastic to experience without commercial breaks in which to ask yourself, “WTF?” Until then, try Smallville and Everwood on The WB—less funny, more flannel. Or maybe Everybody Hates Chris (UPN) … nah.

Record: Alias (ABC), CSI and Without a Trace (CBS), due to their obvious storylines that make as much sense in fast-forward as they do in real time.

Avoid: Survivor: Guatemala (CBS), The Night Stalker (ABC) and everything on NBC and UPN.


http://www.slweekly.com/editorial/2005/tube_2005-10-06.cfm

Actually, I caught the pilot of Everybody Hates Chris when it was streamed on Google last week (or the week before) and I didn't find it a bit funny....

I do like Chris Rock, but I didn't think that his comedy was very likable.

I think once the bloom is off his rose, the ratings for that show will settle down into more typical UPN-like ranges...


I love that line: less funny, more flannel... :up: :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"