• Super Maintenance

    Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates.

    Starting January 9th, site maintenance is ongoing until further notice, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into.

    We apologize for the inconvenience.

Ratner hopes to direct "Young X-Men" Spin-Off

Advanced Dark

Avenger
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Messages
17,587
Reaction score
1
Points
31
Not that it's titled that but it's the best way to describe it. He's all giddy over X3 that he's talked about directing Wolveine and now this. Hope this wasn't posted already. :)

tjn_small_logo.gif

Rattner rides high with "The Last Stand"


By TERRY LAWSON
DETROIT FREE PRESS



Twentieth Century Fox

Director Brett Ratner reviews a scene with Patrick Stewart on the set of “X-Men: The Last Stand.”


While "The Last Stand" marks the end of the X-Men trilogy — some beloved characters meet their demise in the battle against evil — director Brett Ratner says a new series spotlighting a different set of mutants is on the boards.
"And if they want me involved somehow, I'm there. This movie was like my dream come true."
That's what happens when your movie sells $122,861,157 worth of tickets in its first weekend.
It wasn't an easy trip, stepping into the universe brought to life by Bryan Singer in 2000's "X-Men" and 2003's sequel "X2: X-Men United," two of the best comic-book-to-movie adaptations of all time.
"Bryan actually just called to congratulate me on getting the job, and to assure me he thought I was the right guy for the job," says Ratner.
"But when I did ask him if there was anything specific he might tell me that would help me do the job, he gave the best advice I could've gotten. He said, 'Stay off the Internet."'
Since Ratner obeyed, he remained fairly oblivious to a rash of flaming worthy of the fire-hurling X-Man known as Pyro.
One disgruntled Internet-poster compared the hiring of Ratner — whose credits include the "Rush Hour" action comedies and the Hannibal Lecter thriller "Red Dragon" — to putting the captain of the Exxon Valdez behind the wheel of a new luxury liner.
According to Hugh Jackman, who plays fan favorite Wolverine, he and his costars did not panic when they heard the news that Singer had defected to direct "Superman Returns."
"Obviously, Bryan is a talented fella," says Jackman. "But as things preceded in the sort of lumbering way these things seem to do, I think everyone felt fairly sure we could make a good movie without Bryan. He had left us with a pretty good legacy, you know.
Ratner describes himself as "a total comics freak" — though he admits he never read the "X-Men" comics but was a fan of the TV cartoon series. He had been considered to direct the first "X-Men" movie, but was immersed in another much-anticipated comic-book project: the revival of the Superman franchise.
He left that project because the studio would not allow him to cast an unknown actor as the Man of Steel — although, just to complicate the irony, Singer would cast a relative unknown named Brandon Routh.
Various names were considered before the producers settled on Matthew Vaughn, director of the little-seen, but much-acclaimed 2004 crime thriller "Layer Cake." For reasons that remain murky, Vaughn dropped out or was pushed, and Ratner got the call.
But not, hints Jackman, before the senior cast members — including himself, Halle Berry, Patrick Stewart, who plays leader Professor Xavier, and Ian McKellen, who plays nemesis Magneto — were consulted.
"I think we all just wanted to be assured that this movie would remain rooted in the real world, or at least the world we had created in the first two movies," Jackman says.
"The general concern was that when you have all these colorful characters, considered by some people to be freaks, is that it could just turn into a sideshow. You know, 'Here's the hairy man, here's the lizard boy, here's the girl who reads minds!'
"The beauty of these stories is the way they accommodate all our fears and prejudices about the world. They're allegories. Allegories with some very cool action."
Ratner says he was always on the same page with his cast
"I was really, really bummed out when I couldn't do the first movie, and then when the Superman thing fell apart, I started to worry that I would never get the opportunity to make my big comic-book movie," he says.
"Bryan took over Superman, Christopher Nolan had Batman. I mean what was I going to make, 'Ant-Man'?" (Actually, a film based on Ant Man, an original Marvel Comics character, is in the works.)
"So I just considered myself really, really lucky when I got the job. And I just wanted to do the script justice, because it had so much resonance."
In "The Last Stand," each mutant has to search his heart when the government announces that a cure has been found that would suppress the "X" gene responsible for his power.
The anti-X-men brotherhood, headed by Magneto, a Holocaust survivor who has always been convinced that humanity's real agenda is eradication of the mutants, believes the cure is a political ruse that could mean the end of their kind.
"It's such a great metaphor," says Ratner, "because it strikes at the core of who we are, of what makes us. If you were African-American and could take a pill that would turn you white, would you?
"If you were a parent and you were afraid your little kid was going to be gay, and you would be saving them from being ostracized, or even getting AIDS, by getting them injected, would you do that?"
As philosophical as the "X-Men" comics have always been — Ratner remembers the "cure" plotline being part of the animated TV series — "The Last Stand" is hardly short on action and special effects. He says his biggest contribution to the film's shape was moving an extended battle sequence on the San Francisco Bay Bridge from the middle of the movie to its climax.
Ratner is returning to par three of his "Rush Hour" series with Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker, and he has a 208 project on the boards with Eddie Murphy and Chris Rock.
And though the X-men franchise ends here, Jackman says that writer David Benioff ("The 25th Hour") is at work on a third draft of "Wolverine," which could be in theaters in 2008. There is also talk of a Magneto movie that would be a prequel.
 
Colossus better be on the team dang it! :mad:
 
Cudmore is signed for one more though he'd be a main character in the new series I'm sure so they'd renegotiate a 3 pic deal with him again surely.
 
Why? Ratner did a fine job directing this movie all things considered. It's not a freaking separate story really from the first two. It's a chapter in a fabricated trilogy. It's like picking up Lord of the Rings and just reading the final battle sequence. Enjoy it for what it is.
 
They screwed Cyclops! Admit it Ratner, Jackman, Rothman ya'll enjoyed screwing him over.
 
vanillacyke said:
They screwed Cyclops! Admit it Ratner, Jackman, Rothman ya'll enjoyed screwing him over.

Ratner didnt have anything to do with Cyclop's role. :rolleyes:

That was FOX and Rothman, b1tch about them.

Now it was his fault on the short runtime I believe. :(
 
vanillacyke said:
They screwed Cyclops! Admit it Ratner, Jackman, Rothman ya'll enjoyed screwing him over.

Don't blame Ratner. Cyclops' fate was sealed before Ratner signed on.

Keep the blame focused on Rothman and others... not sure about Hugh.
 
Ratner knew the stories. He could of fought for a little bit better treatment of Scott.
 
Ratner still retooled the ending considerably, and the ending was with out a doubt the worst part of the movie.

all things considered we could do a lot worse. But Jackman and Ratner seem to be in love with eachother so Ratner would more likely do Wolverine than the X kids movie.
 
vanillacyke said:
Ratner knew the stories. He could of fought for a little bit better treatment of Scott.

He came on late, with little time, he was lucky to have the job. :confused:
 
vanillacyke said:
Ratner knew the stories. He could of fought for a little bit better treatment of Scott.

How do we know he didn't fight for it?

Zak did, and we all know he unfortunately lost.
 
vanillacyke said:
They screwed Cyclops! Admit it Ratner, Jackman, Rothman ya'll enjoyed screwing him over.

Honestly I could give 2 craps about Cyclops. He's a wooden character to me. It would have been nice to see more of him in action but I'll take more Wolverine anyday over him.

Besides Ratner didn't write this script. Focus your anger on the issue you have with the movie and who made it. Ratner directed it and did a good job.
 
Also they really haven't seemed to make it clear whether this spin off will be entirely new characters or the younger X men. such as Iceman, Rogue, Angel, Colossus and Kitty.

At one point it sounded like it would be a movie about the students, which I have to ask why. If you want unrelated mutants then why not get a point of view outside the brotherhood and X men for a change.
 
WorthyStevens4 said:
How do we know he didn't fight for it?

Zak did, and we all know he unfortunately lost.

Zak fought for the film to feature Cyke...but I think Fox agreed to it because the writers suggested killing his character off.
 
fallenAngel said:
Ratner still retooled the ending considerably, and the ending was with out a doubt the worst part of the movie.

all things considered we could do a lot worse. But Jackman and Ratner seem to be in love with eachother so Ratner would more likely do Wolverine than the X kids movie.

Retooled the ending? Give me a break. He added a 10 second clip that showed nothing and just a Patrick Stewart voice over and it was run after the credits. That means Ratner sucks? Give me a break.
 
fallenAngel said:
Also they really haven't seemed to make it clear whether this spin off will be entirely new characters or the younger X men. such as Iceman, Rogue, Angel, Colossus and Kitty.

At one point it sounded like it would be a movie about the students, which I have to ask why. If you want unrelated mutants then why not get a point of view outside the brotherhood and X men for a change.

Probably will be about the students but Colossus, Beast, and Angel should be around the Mansion and Halle Berry probably would come back for small bits. She talks big but remember she did Catwoman and still wanted to do another one. Nuff said.
 
Advanced Dark said:
Retooled the ending? Give me a break. He added a 10 second clip that showed nothing and just a Patrick Stewart voice over and it was run after the credits. That means Ratner sucks? Give me a break.

I think the original poster was saying that he retooled the 3rd act of the film which he did. That whole sequence with the bridge was supposed to be in the second act.
 
Ratner remembers the "cure" plotline being part of the animated TV series :eek: i dont remember was it used in the animated series? i cant recall.
 
^ If that's true then what's the problem. It flowed fine. Fast...but fine and X3 looked amazing compared to the other 2 films.
 
Downhere said:
Zak fought for the film to feature Cyke...but I think Fox agreed to it because the writers suggested killing his character off.

I think the writers only suggested killing Cyke off because they didn't have a choice, really. Zak said Fox told them Cyclops wouldn't be in the film... so like you said, Fox agreed to it, and knowing the Phoenix storyline had to have involved Cyke unless he was, you know, dead.

I truly believe the writers didn't have a choice.
 
Ratner directed a great placeholder. That is all X3 was, a movie to just exist so if Singer ever wanted to go back and do another X-Film the franchise is still there. What permanent effects is X3 going to have on another film? None. The cure is shown not to work, Prof X is back, Cyke could be alive, Jean is still dead, and the Golden Gate bridge is being rebuilt.

That said, I would like to see someone other than Ratner (not Singer either) take Young X-Men and have FOX let the movie be made the way it should be, not as a vendetta against another director.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"