return of the jedi had a timeless feel too
Compared to Han and Luke getting medals in an elaborate ceremony?I didn't feel it. Star Wars and Empire are very timeless to me. ROTJ ends with a teddy bear picnic. There's just nothing timeless about that.
Because he's a walking carpet? Also, I think some guy made up some ridiculous concept about wookies considering it insulting to get rewards or something. I think this was just before he dressed up as a klingon and stuffed his cock into the tail pipe of his car.^ why didnt chewbacca get a medal!!!!!!!!
When you watch Star Wars and The Empire Strikes Back it has a very timeless look and feel. ROTJ is a different story. The movie is such an `80s film. Especially the scenes at Jabba's place. That whole Han rescue scenes have such an `80s feel and look to them.
Neither of which resemble ROTJ in the slightest, so how is ROTJ a generic 80s movie?
Compared to Han and Luke getting medals in an elaborate ceremony?
^ why didnt chewbacca get a medal!!!!!!!!
I think I can understand where you're going with this. Lucas himself deliberately directed the first movie in an old-fashioned style (although obviously also containing 70's style), and Empire was old-fashioned in it's perfectly measured build-up and interaction between Han and Leia.
Whereas Jedi is very much more straight-forward, racing from one action set-piece to the next with comedic intervals. The ratio of action to characterisation is almost unbalanced, and there is so much it almost gets overbearing. It's very similar to The Temple of Doom.
As much as I enjoy Jedi, it is basically one long action scene.
This is largely down to Lucas. Having made Raiders of the Lost Ark, he decided that the all-action, minimal plot route of that movie was the way to go with Return of the Jedi.
So what you're saying is... a scene set inside and in the dark, and a scene outside in the daytime are going to look different?camera work and lighting:
Empire:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ROTJ:
![]()
![]()
So what you're saying is... a scene set inside and in the dark, and a scene outside in the daytime are going to look different?
Yeah, I'm a 90's child, and Empire Strikes Back feels less 'old' than Return Of The Jedi does.
He has a valid point, I don't know why you are ripping him apart![]()
Agreed. I'm just saying that ROTJ does not look like a 'generic 80s' movie.Yeah, I'm a 90's child, and Empire Strikes Back feels less 'old' than Return Of The Jedi does.
Because there's no debate to be had.
Vader pitching the Emperor over the railing? If that's not THE scene that doesn't make you get up and cheer you are dead inside.
I've been to a lot of geek-filled theaters in my day and I've heard a lot of fanboy cheering over the years. However, at the end of that first-day showing of ROTJ in 1983 when I and most of my middle-school classmates had ditched school to go to the movie and we saw Vader lunge over and grab the Emperor, we were literally up out of our seats screaming in triumph. Too many moviemakers have tried to undeservingly manufacture similar "fist pumping" moments since then (including George Lucas himself) and now we're just too cynical to respond that way anymore. But man, I'm glad I was there to see it the first time.![]()
Everything about Star Wars is super-70's. Just Luke's hair is enough to imbue the whole movie with 70's power.