MessiahDecoy123
Psychological Anarchist
- Joined
- Jan 25, 2008
- Messages
- 25,546
- Reaction score
- 4,517
- Points
- 103
I don't know what white people are scared for. Everyone knows the rioters will be restricted to poor, black neighborhoods by the police.
They will riot, loot, and destroy their own communities because they are idiots.I don't know what white people are scared for. Everyone knows the rioters will be restricted to poor, black neighborhoods by the police.
Posted this in the stupid thread but this is the billboard some idiots put up
![]()
http://forums.superherohype.com/showpost.php?p=30133307&postcount=5
They will riot, loot, and destroy their own communities because they are idiots.
This idea that you put a state in a state of emergency because of a court ruling really is insane.
I never realized how segregated St. Louis was. Holy crap. It's like Alabama in the 1960's.
Does they contradict my point? No. You just illustrated more idiots.Looters are idiots. No argument there. But cops have been known to let rioters go unchallenged until they come close to white neighborhoods.
And even educated college kids riot and destroy their own campus.
Because they lost/won a ball game.![]()
Wasn't Brown found out to have just robbed a store, witness reports and an autopsy confirm a scuffle between the officer and Brown leading to Brown's death?
Is that what people riot over nowadays? I have an idea. Let's say a white cop killed an unarmed innocent family loving teenager to make sure everyone gets the right message. LOOT! Free TV's!
Very much like Alabama in the 1960's...The city has far more of a history leading up to this than most in the media have clued in to....
1) Who are you referring to?
2) I'm not seeing the irony. Does a bigot have to like either Muslims or White Supremacist in order to not be a hypocrite? Why?
Wasn't Brown found out to have just robbed a store, witness reports and an autopsy confirm a scuffle between the officer and Brown leading to Brown's death?
Is that what people riot over nowadays? I have an idea. Let's say a white cop killed an unarmed innocent family loving teenager to make sure everyone gets the right message. LOOT! Free TV's!
experts not involved in the investigation told the Post-Dispatch that the autopsy suggests a struggle at close range:
The St. Louis medical examiner, Dr. Michael Graham, who is not part of the official investigation, reviewed the autopsy report for the newspaper. He said Tuesday that it does support that there was a significant altercation at the car.
Graham said the examination indicated a shot traveled from the tip of Browns right thumb toward his wrist. The official report notes an absence of stippling, powder burns around a wound that indicate a shot fired at relatively short range.
But Graham said, Sometimes when its really close, such as within an inch or so, there is no stipple, just smoke.
Everything I've seen about that says the autopsy was inconclusive in that aspect and couldn't determine whether he had his hands up or not.What does the autopsy say about Brown having his hands raised?
Because everything before that shouldn't matter if he was surrendering.
Have we actually seen the OFFICIAL AUTOPSY, or has all of that come from the families doctor that checked the autopsy?
I honestly haven't been following this all that closely, so real question....???
The hired private one was officially released and the The St. Louis County medical examiners autopsy was leaked.Have we actually seen the OFFICIAL AUTOPSY, or has all of that come from the families doctor that checked the autopsy?
I honestly haven't been following this all that closely, so real question....???
The hired private one was officially released and the The St. Louis County medical examiners autopsy was leaked.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/michael-browns-official-autopsy-report-actually-reveal/
Links to both are in this article.
Supposedly the Ferguson Police Department actually has had dash cams for awhile now(or personal officer cams, I can't remember which)but they just hadn't gotten around to installing them yet.I don't want cameras everywhere but cop cars should have a 360 degree camera shot in HD and it must be protocol to turn them on when confronting someone. And if they fail they get desk duty or a strike against them. too many strikes and they are fired. I mean it is hard to believe the cop car didn't recorded anything useful.
I don't want cameras everywhere but cop cars should have a 360 degree camera shot in HD and it must be protocol to turn them on when confronting someone. And if they fail they get desk duty or a strike against them. too many strikes and they are fired. I mean it is hard to believe the cop car didn't recorded anything useful.
Cops should be required to wear body cameras at all times.
No more "he said, she said" nonsense. Whatever the cop sees, we see.
Every complaint and accusation of police abuse verified or disproved with video evidence.
In this California city use of force declined 60% once body cameras were introduced.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/what-happens-when-police-officers-wear-body-cameras-1408320244
I agree.Cops should be required to wear body cameras at all times.
No more "he said, she said" nonsense. Whatever the cop sees, we see.
Every complaint and accusation of police abuse verified or disproved with video evidence.
In this California city use of force declined 60% once body cameras were introduced.
http://online.wsj.com/articles/what-happens-when-police-officers-wear-body-cameras-1408320244