Robin Hood Reboot: Avengers Style

Even Ivanhoe's fallen into public domain, at least in the US, and that was the last really huge mythology defining story, what with tying Robin right into the quarrel between John and Richard, featuring an outlaws-storm-the-castle sequence, and the whole Saxon Vs Norman subplot.

Now with these four films, I'm curious how they approach any franchise ideas. Because in spite of how stupid "pulling an Avengers" sounds, Robin Hood does have the potential for multiple films, kind of like King Arthur. The Merry Men are a large collection of colorful characters with pop-culture footprints, and some, like Little John and Maid Marian, have held multiple books on their own. And event he villains have potential: the Sheriff is a classic archetype of corrupt government, Prince John has rarely been an underperformed character in these stories, Guy of Gisborne has a fanbase of fanatics to deploy, and you've got characters like Red Roger and the Prioress to expand,a nd the entire cast of historical characters like Geoffrey Plantagenet, John and Richard's half-brother, Sheriff of Yorkshire and Archbishop of York.

The biggest idea I would have would be to cast Robin Hood as a Nick-Fury-like connecting character, albeit as a major antagonist or supporting character. Imagine seeing the story of a whole ballad, but played in reverse perspective, where after a film full of adventures that have frayed his nerves and temper, Little John runs into some smirking little piece of crud on a log bridge. Or maybe, in the mini-holocaust that followed Richard's coronation, Maid Marian has to seek help from a cunning but compassionate outlaw and they have a connection. Or maybe Guy of Gisborne is trying to weasel his way out of outlawry and back into a knighthood by helping the Sheriff defraud a humble knight from Lea, only to find himself in an outlaw vs. outlaw battle.
 
Hmmm

I will say a Robin Hood that I am more looking forward too is one that is more of a fun, adventure movie rather than gritty or a kid's film.

Not exactly like Sherlock Holmes or POTC, but something along those lines. A bit more serious though
 
I've always found the Robin Hood stuff a bit stupid, its all about saving England from the bad Prince John and save it for the wonderful King Richard the Lionheart. But if you look at history Richard was a really awful King, he hated England, barely ever set foot in it, only visiting it to strip the country of all its money to fund his crusades. And when he had stripped the country of money he massacred the Jews of York for their gold.

Although I do like The Zany Adventures of Robin Hood with George Segal.
 
Hmmm

I will say a Robin Hood that I am more looking forward too is one that is more of a fun, adventure movie rather than gritty or a kid's film.

Not exactly like Sherlock Holmes or POTC, but something along those lines. A bit more serious though

I agree with you, African-Americanman. Robin Hood is best that way. Something like Adventures of Robin Hood (1938) or Mark of Zorro (1940).
 
But if you look at history Richard was a really awful King, he hated England, barely ever set foot in it, only visiting it to strip the country of all its money to fund his crusades.

...best king ever.
 
Yeah, really. Robin Hood films up to this point have pretty much been the Fox News to King Richard's George W. Bush.
 
:hehe:

I want a movie where Bush is a crazy tyrant like prince John. Obama is a Robin Hood-like character, talking about "change" and Glenn Beck shows up as Bush's evil hunchbacked henchman.

Barack Ohood defeats the tyrant in a swordfight and becomes the new leader. Glenn Beck is eaten by crocodiles.

Little John: "what now, Barack?"

B. Ohood: "We're going to use the money to build more of these. I call them drones. You can keep the change."

It ends with Little John and the merry men standing in the streets. We hear the cries of the poor, and there's dead people in the streets.

Little John: "...much better than the other guy."

The End.
 
Since there are 100 Robin Hood movies in the work and only one thread, I feel like making another Robin Hood thread would be moot.

This news is from Lionsgate, not Sony, for THEIR Robin Hood film. It looks like they found a director:

Lionsgate wants to get moving on its film Robin Hood: Origins before any of the other Robin Hood projects in town gather more momentum, and so the studio is set on filling the director’s chair faster than Friar Tuck can empty a skin of wine. The studio’s choice looks to be Otto Bathurst, whose career so far has been primarily in television, with episodes of Peaky Blinders and Black Mirror among his recent accomplishments.

Deadline reports that Lionsgate has been “meeting with numerous hot helmers,” and has set its eye on Bathurst to direct the script by Joby Harold, (Guy Ritchie’s Knights Of The Roundtable: King Arthur).

I laughed at the synopsis because it's IDENTICAL to Ridley Scott's Robin Hood:

Robin Hood returns from fighting in The Crusades and finds that Sherwood Forest is rife with corruption and evil. He forms a band of outlaws and they take matters into their own hands. This is a gritty take, with no felt hats.

At this rate, I prefer to see the felt hats.
 
Same here. I'm already sick of "gritty".

Me, too. I want a fun Robin Hood, not another dark, brooding Robin Hood. We've already got quite a few of those.

One of the reasons I really like Errol Flynn's version is that they wrote him so he could be lighthearted and mischievous, but also serious when he needed to be, such as when he's showing Marian the tortured peasants he's sheltering from Prince John's outrages. You can have a hero who's both if you write him correctly.
 
I would rather see swashbuckling Robin Hood over gritty Robin Hood.
 
Since there are 100 Robin Hood movies in the work and only one thread, I feel like making another Robin Hood thread would be moot.

This news is from Lionsgate, not Sony, for THEIR Robin Hood film. It looks like they found a director:

I laughed at the synopsis because it's IDENTICAL to Ridley Scott's Robin Hood:


At this rate, I prefer to see the felt hats.

Me, too. I want a fun Robin Hood, not another dark, brooding Robin Hood. We've already got quite a few of those.

One of the reasons I really like Errol Flynn's version is that they wrote him so he could be lighthearted and mischievous, but also serious when he needed to be, such as when he's showing Marian the tortured peasants he's sheltering from Prince John's outrages. You can have a hero who's both if you write him correctly.
I would rather see swashbuckling Robin Hood over gritty Robin Hood.


They are so f***ing dumb

AS Octobertist said it's literally Ridley's Robin Hood and people didn't take to that
 
The only difference is making it more action packed, with a younger cast. But that's about it.
 
Otto Bathurst, huh?

Well then, Robin Hood had better make Prince John f*** a pig or I'm not bothering to see it.
 
Last edited:
Peaky Blinders is an amazing show. I'll say that.
 
Egerton, Hoult Wanted For "Robin Hood"

By Garth Franklin Friday July 31st 2015 12:44PM
With numerous Robin Hood-themed projects in the works, Lionsgate is looking to get ahead of its rivals and is moving fast on its "Batman Begins"-style take on the dashing Nottingham hero which is currently titled "Robin Hood: Origins".
"Kingsman: The Secret Service" star Taron Egerton heads up a shortlist that includes Dylan O'Brien ("The Maze Runner"), Nicholas Hoult ("X-Men: First Class"), Jack Huston ("Boardwalk Empire") and Jack Reynor ("Transformers: Age of Extinction") for the title role in this gritty, revisionist version of the Sherwood Forest outlaw which Joby Harold has penned.
Scheduling is said to be a major issue but reportedly Reynor had a successful session with director Otto Bathurst ("Peaky Blinders") and is said to have been the only actor of the bunch who has done such a meeting. No decisions have been made yet but filming is aiming to begin in the first quarter of next year.
Harold, Tory Tunnell, Leonardo DiCaprio and Jennifer Davisson will produce. This is not to be confused with Disney's "Nottingham & Hood" which is said to be a family adventure tale akin to "Enchanted," Sony's "Hood" which is more like the fast action of the "Fast and Furious" franchise, and a Warner Brothers version from "Gangster Squad" scribe Will Beall.
Source: Deadline
 
They are still trying to go ahead with this? And against a half dozen others attempting to bring out their own?

I know Hollywood has a limited selection of original stories to tell and they rehash all the time but this number of movies with this variation in interpetations is beyond ridiculous.
 
It's literally the same damn thing as the Ridley Scott version that failed.

But ok. Edgarton is cool I guess.
 
Didn't Ridley Scott already do the Robin Hood origins movie and well...yeah?
 
I really wish they had gone with the original plan to make Nottingham with Crowe as the Sheriff and protagonist. It was the last chance Robin Hood had to be fresh.
 
I really wish they had gone with the original plan to make Nottingham with Crowe as the Sheriff and protagonist. It was the last chance Robin Hood had to be fresh.

That at least was something different and more of a fresher take on the material instead of well...this. For whatever reason, after Scott came aboard, he decided it should be a more traditional Robin Hood film but with a gritty origin story to go with it.
 
I really wish they had gone with the original plan to make Nottingham with Crowe as the Sheriff and protagonist. It was the last chance Robin Hood had to be fresh.

Agreed. Wouldn't mind if they dug that project out of development hell though.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,294
Messages
22,081,654
Members
45,881
Latest member
lucindaschatz
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"