The Amazing Spider-Man 2 Rotten Tomatoes score? - Part 2

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]477371[/split]

 

[Thread Manager]

This is a continuation thread, the old thread is [split]476767[/split]

 

[spiderman2]

yeah I agree that it is going to be hard to be in the 80's. I hope it dose but I don't think that it will. I do think that it could stay in the 70's and above thor 2's 65 but we will see.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

I see it staying in the 70's as well.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

I think will know by Tuesday whether it will stay in the 70s, or move up or down. If the US reviews are frontloaded heavily good, I think it could stay in the mid 70s. If it dips into the 60s after 30-40 more reviews, I don't think it will make it back up.

 

[Avenging Spidey]

The multiplier for IM3 is related to how frontloaded that film was more than the lack of legs it had, in my opinion. So if TASM2 is less front loaded than IM3 and certainly it will, it can have a better multiplier but still gross less than that film, bot dom and os.

A 2.34 multiplier from $140m OW means $327m for TASM2. A bigger multiplier could make the film get to $350m. But this is all guesses until we actually see the numbers and projections next weekend.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

The multiplier for IM3 is related to how frontloaded that film was more than the lack of legs it had, in my opinion. So if TASM2 is less front loaded than IM3 and certainly it will, it can have a better multiplier but still gross less than that film, bot dom and os.

A 2.34 multiplier from $140m OW means $327m for TASM2. A bigger multiplier could make the film get to $350m. But this is all guesses until we actually see the numbers and projections next weekend.

And if it is at $100mil as some sites are suggesting? Also did you just up your estimate to $140mil?

 

[spiderman2]

yeah I think that is a good assessment has with 30-40 more reviews we will be at 95-105 reviews by then you are talking about like 40-50% of the reviews being out. How many told reviews do you think we will be at by Tuesday? I don't really now how fast reviews come out before a movie and such has I don't normal follow has I don't listen at all to reviews when it comes to if I am going to see a movie or not. But this is spider man so I want it to do while and bad reviews do make me nervors.

 

[spiderman2]

115 million OW book it!

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

Yes where did you get that 140mil number from? Nobody thinks it's going to do that well, not one person.

 

[spiderman2]

yeah I am trying to optimiske but 140 I don't think I think 125 max.

 

[DarthSkywalker]

yeah I think that is a good assessment has with 30-40 more reviews we will be at 95-105 reviews by then you are talking about like 40-50% of the reviews being out. How many told reviews do you think we will be at by Tuesday? I don't really now how fast reviews come out before a movie and such has I don't normal follow has I don't listen at all to reviews when it comes to if I am going to see a movie or not. But this is spider man so I want it to do while and bad reviews do make me nervors.

It has been my experience that the first real wave of North American reviews come on Monday and Tuesday of the film's release. Nothing is set in stone though, but considering there doesn't seem to be an embargo, I'd expect it. Also, many reviews don't get posted until the day before, which would be Thursday.

 

[Avenging Spidey]

And if it is at $100mil as some sites are suggesting? Also did you just up your estimate to $140mil?

My guesstimate has always been $150m, it's on the proper thread to talk about that.

If the film opens just above $100m DOM, then the multiplier will possibly be bigger, but it'll end up closer to the box office numbers of the first one. Possibly slightly bigger, but not by much. I don't really think that's going to be the case though.

 

[Liam_H]

Avenging Spidey eerily reminds me of this loony that was on here two years ago. But he was banned so it can't be the same person can it?

 

[DarthSkywalker]

Yes where did you get that 140mil number from? Nobody thinks it's going to do that well, not one person.

Oh no SPIDEY, that is where you are wrong. There is one person.

115 million OW book it!

That would be a great start.

 

[I SEE SPIDEY]

Oh no SPIDEY, that is where you are wrong. There is one person.

He's saying his prediction is 150mil now. Where is the Hunger Games style buzz for this film to reach that number?

 

[Mr. Dent]

You are welcome to point them to me and the others of the board, there is even a thread for that here.

I'm not looking that **** up. I'm not the one posting a handful of reviews like they're a microcasm of every TASM2 review and ignoring everything else

And of course that there will be a handful of reviews that will hate on film, it happens with every single of these mainstream superhero films, I'm comfortable with my Iron Man3 comparison here though, that film showed to have some great legs and a great multiplier for a superhero film, something I suspect that The Amazing Spider-Man 2 will have too.

It did not have great legs or a great multiplier, it was average in every sense of the word. And this is nothing like IM3, so stop bringing it up, This isn't a matter of opinion, there is literally nothing to back up your claim that this is similar to IM3 other than your own blind belief and want for this film to be like IM3. It isn't and it won't.

The "attitude" that I have is discuss everything with respect. I disagree with your opinions, I don't attack you as a person. Big difference here.

NOPE I DIDN'T CALL SOMEONE BIAS BECAUSE THEY DISAGREED WITH ME, NOPE I DID NOT CALL SOMEONE CUTE FOR CALLING ME OUT, NOPE I DID NOT CALL SOMEONE SON, NOPE I DID NOT SAY SOMEONE'S OPINION WOULD BE PROVEN STUPID. NU UH STOP PICKING ON ME I'M BEING COMPLETELY RESPECTFUL IT'S JUST THAT MY OPINION IS RIGHT.

Well, I'm reporting you again. Not only you're attacking me, but you are encouraging others to do so, it seems to me that you are resorting on personal attacks because you can't come up with better arguments, than your last straw is the ad hominem attacks.

It's perfect. Rail on about his own beliefs -> people call him out on how they make no sense -> claim they are bias -> when people call him out on being a hypocrite say they're the ones calling him names and that he's reporting them -> gets his arguments destroyed and then say they're resorting to name calling because they don't have any other arguments. Rinse and repeat. Literally like talking to a wall.

Not really trying to be snarky. I was just calling you the same that you called me, haven't you called me "breh"?

Son, look up the definition of snarky.

Great reading of what my posts are. Thank God that I've known from other members here that they appreciate my posts and my presence here.

Yeah that one guys supporting you sure does make me see how valuable you are. I'm sorry.

I prepared a long post to answer your first point, but only after that I've read what you said here. My father died less than seven months ago, and I have no words to say to you anymore. I'm putting you on the ignore list and taking this to the mods. Hopefully you will get the ban that you have worked so hard to deserve.

I'm sure it would have been more of the same broken and ill conceived logic.

And, no, I'm not going to feel sorry for you because your dad died. If you don't want people to bring up your parents then don't arbitrarily bring them up for no reason and then act sad when someone says something about them. It's the most annoying thing when people do that.

 

[Mr. Dent]

Avenging Spidey eerily reminds me of this loony that was on here two years ago. But he was banned so it can't be the same person can it?

Be careful, he's going to report you to the mods for that.

The multiplier for IM3 is related to how frontloaded that film was more than the lack of legs it had, in my opinion. So if TASM2 is less front loaded than IM3 and certainly it will, it can have a better multiplier but still gross less than that film, bot dom and os.

A 2.34 multiplier from $140m OW means $327m for TASM2. A bigger multiplier could make the film get to $350m. But this is all guesses until we actually see the numbers and projections next weekend.

Every CBM blockbuster is front loaded.

 

[spiderman2]

What does front loaded mean?

 

[DarthSkywalker]

Be careful, he's going to report you to the mods for that.


Every CBM blockbuster is front loaded.

Not everyone. TDK and the Avengers weren't.

He's saying his prediction is 150mil now. Where is the Hunger Games style buzz for this film to reach that number?

The reason they dumped Mary Jane is because Katniss will be Peter's love interest by the end of this film.

 

[Mr. Dent]

*sees people bickering on an internet forum* Smh. C'mon guys. Let's get on topic here. Yeesh.

We are on topic.

What does front loaded mean?

When a movie makes most of its gross in the first 2-3 weeks. Or how the opening weekend is its biggest weekend.

 

[Liam_H]

What does front loaded mean?

Box Office term for how front loaded a movie is, generally in comparison to its opening weekend.

 

[Mr. Dent]

Not everyone. TDK and the Avengers weren't.

yeah but i think those are the only exceptions other than Spider-Man and maybe the first Iron Man? I mean, it's a foregone conclusion TASM2 will be front loaded.

 

[Avenging Spidey]

What does front loaded mean?

Front loaded means that a film gets a big chunk of its attention in the opening weekend. It happens with most of the blockbuster films that open north to $150m+.

But let's get back on topic, I'd hate to see this thread closed too.

 

[Mr. Dent]

I like how this kid put me on ignore because I put him on blast and he couldn't handle it. Excellent.