Spider-ManHero12
Web-Slinger
- Joined
- Jul 7, 2006
- Messages
- 47,238
- Reaction score
- 2
- Points
- 31
Hmm, interesting.
Absolutely not.
Sony releasing the PlayStation 3 a year after the Xbox 360 was actually good for them. It allowed them to develop a console that is very reliable hardware wise and allowed them to get blu-ray to take off (blu-ray was not ready in 2005). The Xbox 360 on the other hand is a rushed piece of hardware because Microsoft was so adamant on releasing a year ahead of Sony and Nintendo, if they weren't so determined to have that head start, you wouldn't be seeing the massive RROD problems that has plagued the Xbox brand's image.
What really hurt Sony was that they decided to release a console at $599 US Dollars with only one game worth playing (Resistance: Fall of Man). With the Xbox 360 you had it launched at $399 and had several titles that were pretty damn good launch titles and followed up with their momentum while PlayStation 3 owners have waited quite a while for Sony to start building some. And dare I say that their advertising campaign was utterly atrocious.
And in the end, the year head start has really amounted to nothing with the Xbox 360 in last place in Japan and Europe and is expected to fall from second place to third place (which is something that Microsoft did not want at all). Nintendo has slaughtered both Sony and Microsoft with the Wii and Sony has picked up massive momentum with the PS3 Slim, excellent first party titles, and an advertising campaign that isn't ******ed (the Kevin Butler ads are freaking awesome).
First, it´s only a rumor, it might not be true.This news might not make me get a PS3 next year. Why get one, when I could just wait? Unless Sony's going to do a PS3 on us & not have PS3 games backwards compatible (I want to play GOW3 & Uncharted 2 badly. They're the main reasons I want a PS3)
Isildur´s Heir;17773390 said:I´m getting a PS3 in 2012, when Kratos arrives.
My bad, i meant 2010Say what now?
I have a feeling 360 will rise to second again because of all of it's exclusives next year (Halo: Reach, Mass Effect 2, Fable 3 Splinter Cell: Conviction & Alan Wake for starters) & project Natal. This was PS3's year to shine because Sony realized that people weren't going to buy a $400 console when there's 2 cheaper ones out & they finally got exclusives that were worth something. (Uncharted 2 FTW)
This news might not make me get a PS3 next year. Why get one, when I could just wait? Unless Sony's going to do a PS3 on us & not have PS3 games backwards compatible (I want to play GOW3 & Uncharted 2 badly. They're the main reasons I want a PS3)
Isildur´s Heir;17773390 said:I´m getting a PS3 in 2012, when Kratos arrives.
Thats why the world is going to end in 2012.![]()
Bah, I won't be buying another £300/$500 machine so soon after the last one..
Some of the popular gaming franchises are still adjusting to the capabilities of the current system(s)
I believe Sony said that they plan on the Playstation 3 lasting at least ten years. The console released in '06 so I think PS4 will release in 2016.
Don't quote me on this, but I think they stated the ten year plan in their E3 press conference stating thats why they were delaying it. They want to make a machine that is going to last a while.![]()
lol...guess you missed on the Dreamcast. That was my shortest console, not by choiceExactly. I bought my PS3 just last year. My family had the old PS1 from 1996-2001 and I had the PS2 from 2001-2008. I ain't getting no PS3 in 2012, especially since the others were in use for over 5 years. The shortest time I've ever had a console was the GameCube from 2004-2007.
Just because the console maker will support the system, doesnt mean developers will. All major projects have shifted to the PS3. The PS2s biggest titles now are PSP ports. Some developers like Activsion and EA still make multiplatform games for the PSP alongside the PSP and Wii, bc of the comparable power the 3 have, but its most often an inferior version to what the PS3 has to offer. You wont feel the difference within the year that a new console drops but after that, you'll see the quality in games shift. Usually at this point in a systems life cycle they would primarily be getting kiddie games and sports titles. The main reaon why that hasnt been the case for the PS2, is bc of the PSP. Theres definetly a reason for all serious gamers to make the jump before the 10 year cycle is doneWelp I got my dumb ass stamp for today.
Personally I don't care, if they are going to support the console for ten years why even bother getting another one? There is still a lot of untapped power in the Playstation 3 that I don't see them releasing another console anytime soon.
Now 360 on the other hand, thats a different story. But Sony actually took the time to craft a nice machine, why start another generation so soon? This one is just getting started.
For Sony at least.![]()
lol...guess you missed on the Dreamcast. That was my shortest console, not by choice
man the controller was great. While it lacked some features which have since become standard, I thought it was a pretty good one. I first played console FPS on that using the face buttons to move and analog stick to aim. I dont know how I was able to accomplish that as Ive attempted it with the PS controller, but I did it with Unreal Tournament, Outrigger and Quake and was pretty good at it. Plus I also liked the VMUs and thought that was a good idea that didnt quite take offI'm going to be honest. I hated the Dreamcast.
I was never a Sega fan with the only Sega system my family had was the original Sega Master System, and even then we played with the Nintendo far more.
But I outright hated the Dreamcast. For the same reason I hated the original Xbox, the god awful controller.
Isildur´s Heir;17773390 said:First, it´s only a rumor, it might not be true.
Second, even if you buy a PS3 in 2010, you still have 3 years ahead (2010 itself, 2011 and 2012, because consoles usually only are released in the Fall).
Then, if you only get the PS4 in 2013, that makes it 4 years of PS3 time.
I´m getting a PS3 in 2012, when Kratos arrives.
man the controller was great. While it lacked some features which have since become standard, I thought it was a pretty good one. I first played console FPS on that using the face buttons to move and analog stick to aim. I dont know how I was able to accomplish that as Ive attempted it with the PS controller, but I did it with Unreal Tournament, Outrigger and Quake and was pretty good at it. Plus I also liked the VMUs and thought that was a good idea that didnt quite take off
Isildur´s Heir;17779206 said:I think it´s official to say, Microsoft, unless they make something realllllly drastic, they are in for a gigantic fall, and they will lose second place in 2010.
I was just looking at the numbers, and .....
Not only the PS3 outsold the 360 on Black Friday, the two most pre-ordered games in the US at this point are: God of War and MAG
All of this just to say that, they can very well release a new console 3 years after the next Xbox, the playstation will always win.
Unless the real reason is the blur-ray drive, which, in this case, Microsoft needs to release one.....fast.