BrianWilly
Disciple of Whedon
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2003
- Messages
- 13,275
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 56
...Don't lie to me. Why must you lie?Beechen.
...Don't lie to me. Why must you lie?Beechen.
he was never shown to be a bad guy.. other then that "forcing" himself on Supergirl thing.. he was after all a titan in 52..Da fock?! Power Boy as a hero? Or are they really setting the "there's always a traitor in the Titans" cliché in such an early and visible manner? I guess DC is going for their own Pym.![]()
he was never shown to be a bad guy.. other then that "forcing" himself on Supergirl thing.. he was after all a titan in 52..
He might be a good guy as long as he stays 100 feet away from supergirl :P
You liedBeechen
All these "estates" are filled with money grabbing greedy ****es that are living off the legacies of their husbands, dad, grandfathers etc and have done nothing to deserve any of what they get. It's the same with the Kane estate.
In the Siegel's case, it's the same as reparations. Just because he didn't get paid, doesn't mean you deserve to.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Well why does DC get to keep all the money then?
im glad stan lee does'nt have any kids.
Because they printed the comics using their resources and such. That's much more than his greedy widows or kids did.![]()
Im not trying to be a wise guy, or anything...i just dont get why in this situation, the families of Superman's creators are "greedy bastards", yet the huge business conglomerate is somehow justified in keeping the lion's share of profits.
IIRC, Supes creators finally got some cash, but it didnt even come out to 5% of what Superman had made at that point in time.
That kinda sucks.
I thought I knew everything there was to know about the DCU, but Son of Vulcan or whatever has me completely stumped. Who the frak?